An Empirical Evaluation of The Effects of R&D Subsidies

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 111-148

  Busom, Isabel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Policy evaluation; R D; Subsidies; Technology policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85062771348     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590000000006     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Antonelli, C., 1989. A failure inducement model of research and development expenditure: Italian evidence from early 1980s. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12 (2): 159–180.
2. Busom, L. 1993. “ Los proyectos de I+D de las empresas: Un analisis empirico de algunas de sus Caracteristicas ”. In Revista Espanola de Economia, 39–65. Monografico Investigation y Desarrollo.
3. Capron, H. (1992) Economic Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of the Impact of R&D Programs, Comission of the European Communities, Monitor/Spear, EUR 14864 EN.
4. CDTI. 1988. “ Ministerio de Industria y Energia ”. In Memoria 1988 Madrid, Spain
5. Cunéo, P., 1984. Limpact de la recherche et developpement sur la productivite industrielle. Economie et Statistique, 164: 3–18.
6. Delbono, F., and Denicolo, V., 1990. R&D Investment in a symmetric and homogeneous oligopoly: Bertrand versus Cournot. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8 (2): 297–313.
7. Folster, S. (1992) ‘Should Cooperative R&D be subsidized: an empirical analysis', mimeo, presented at the EARIE 1992 Meetings. Stuttgart.
8. Griliches, Z., 1986. Productivity, R&D and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970's. American Economic Review, 76 (1): 41–154.
9. Griliches, Z., and Lichtenberg, F., 1984. “ R&D and Productivity Growth at the Industry Level: Is there still a Relationship? ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., 465–496. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
10. Hall, B., R&D Tax Policy During the Eighties: Success or Failure?. Tax Policy and the Economy, 1–35.
11. Hall, B.H., and Mairesse, J., 1995. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65: 263–293.
12. Hall, B.H., Mairesse, J., Branstetter, L., and Crepon, B., 1998. “ Does Cash Flow Cause Investment and R&D: An Exploration using panel data for French, Japanese and United States Scientific Firms ”. In Innovation, Industry Evolution and Employment, Edited by: Audretsch, D., and Thurik, A., NBER and MlT Press. forthcoming in
13. Heckman, J., and Robb, R., 1985. Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. An overview. Journal of Econometrics, 30
14. Holemans, B., and Sleuwaegen, L., 1988. Innovation expenditures and the role of government in Belgium. Research Policy., 17: 375–379.
15. Kauko, K., 1996. Effectiveness of R&D subsidies -a skeptical note on the empirical literature. Research Policy, 25: 321–323.
16. Klette, J., and Moen, J., R&D investment responses to R&D subsidies: A theoxtical analysis and a microeconometric study. mimeo, presented at TSER workshop, CEMFI. Madrid
17. Labeaga, J.M., and Martinez-Ros, E., 1994. Estimacion de un modelo de ecuaciones simultaneas con variables dependientes limitadas: una aplicacion con datos de la industria espanola. Investigaciones Economicas, XVIII (3): 465–439.
18. Levin, R., and Reiss, P., 1984. “ Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and market structure ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, Edited by: Griliches, Z., 175–204. University of Chicago Press.
19. Lichtenberg, F., 1984. The Relationship between Federal Contract R&D and Company R&D. American Economic Review;, 74 (2) May: 73–78. 1984
20. Lichtenberg, F., 1987. The Effect of Government Funding on Private Industrial Research and Development: a Re-assessment. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 36 (1): 97–104.
21. Lichtenberg, F., 1988. The Private R&D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competitions. American Economic Review, 78: 3, 550–59.
22. Lichtenberg, F. (1992) ‘R&D investment and international productivity differences', NBER, Working Paper No. 4161.
23. Mowery, D., 1995. “ The Practice of Technology Policy ”. In Handbook of the Economics of lnnovation and Technological Change, Edited by: Stoneman, P., 513–558. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Meng, Chun-Lo, and Schmidt, P., 1985. On the cost of partial observability in the Bivariate Probit Model. lnternational Economic Review, 26 (1): 71–85.
25. Nadiri, M.I., and Mamuneas, T.P., 1994. The Effects of Public infrastructure and R&D capital on the cost structure and performance of US manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, LXXVI (1): 22–37.
26. Mamuneas, Th. P. and M.I. Nadiri (1995) ‘Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the US Manufacturing Industries', NBER Working Paper 5059.
27. Park, W.G., 1995. International R&D Spillovers and OECD Economic Growth. Economic Inquiry, XXXIII: 571–591.
28. Navas, J.E., 1984. “ a financiacion publica de las actividades empresariales en investigacion y desarrollo ”. In Moneda y Credito 37–53.
29. Poirier, D., 1980. Partial Observabilily in Bivariate Robit Models. Journal of Econometrics, 12: 209–217.
30. Scott, J.T., 1984. “ Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D ”. In R&D, Patents and Productivity, University of Chicago Press. in Grilicbes, Z
31. Veugelers, R., and Vanden-Houte, P., 1990. Domestic R&D in the presence of multinational enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8: 1–15.