Ancient European dog genomes reveal continuity since the Early Neolithic

Nature Communications

Volumn 8, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Botigué, Laura R ^a   Song, Shiya ^b   Scheu, Amelie ^c,d   Gopalan, Shyamalika ^a   Pendleton, Amanda L ^b   Oetjens, Matthew ^b   Taravella, Angela M ^b   Seregély, Timo ^e   Zeeb Lanz, Andrea ^f   Arbogast, Rose Marie ^g   Bobo, Dean ^a   Daly, Kevin ^d   Unterländer, Martina ^c   Burger, Joachim ^c   Kidd, Jeffrey M ^b   Veeramah, Krishna R ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BAMBERG   (Germany)

^f Generaldirektion Kulturelles Erbe Rheinland Pfalz   (Germany)

^g CNRS UMR 7044 UDS ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCIENT DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ADAPTATION; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ANCESTRY; CANID; DOMESTICATION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENOME; MUTATION; NEOLITHIC; PALEOLITHIC;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DOG; DOG BREED; DOMESTICATION; GENE DOSAGE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN; HAPLOGROUP; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME; MUTATION RATE; NEOLITHIC; NONHUMAN; PALEOLITHIC; PETROUS BONE; PHYLOGENY; SEGMENTAL DUPLICATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

EUROPE; GERMANY;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DOGS; DOMESTICATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

EID: 85024842165     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms16082     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Parker, H. G. et al. Genetic structure of the purebred domestic dog. Science 304, 1160-1164 (2004).
2. Benecke, N. Studies on early dog remains from Northern Europe. J. Archaeol. Sci. 14, 31-49 (1987).
3. Perri, A. A wolf in dogs clothing: initial dog domestication and Pleistocene wolf variation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 68, 1-4 (2016).
4. Horard-Herbin, M.-P., Tresset, A. & Vigne, J.-D. Domestication and uses of the dog in western Europe from the Paleolithic to the Iron Age. Anim. Front. 4, 23-31 (2014).
5. Thalmann, O. et al. Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science 342, 871-874 (2013).
6. Savolainen, P., Zhang, Y.-P., Luo, J., Lundeberg, J. & Leitner, T. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science 298, 1610-1613 (2002).
7. Wang, G.-D. et al. Out of southern East Asia: The natural history of domestic dogs across the world. Cell Res. 26, 21-33 (2016).
8. Vonholdt, B. M. et al. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature 464, 898-902 (2010).
9. Shannon, L. M. et al. Genetic structure in village dogs reveals a Central Asian domestication origin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13639-13644 (2015).
10. Lüning, J. Erneute Gedanken zur Benennung der neolitischen Perioden. Germania 74, 233-237 (1996).
11. Deguilloux, M. F., Moquel, J., Pemonge, M. H. & Colombeau, G. Ancient DNA supports lineage replacement in European dog gene pool: insight into Neolithic southeast France. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 513-519 (2009).
12. Frantz, L. A. F. et al. Genomic and archaeological evidence suggest a dual origin of domestic dogs. Science 352, 1228-1231 (2016).
13. Haak, W. et al. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature 522, 207-211 (2015).
14. Seregély, T., Burgdorf, P., Gresik, G., Müller, M. S. & Wilk, A. Tote Menschen und Tiere in finsteren Felsschächteny-neue Dokumentationsmethodik und erste Untersuchungsergebnisse zur Kirschbaumhöhle in Oberfranken. Praehistorische Zeitschrift 90, 214-244 (2015).
15. Ginolhac, A., Rasmussen, M., Gilbert, M. T. P., Willerslev, E. & Orlando, L. mapDamage: Testing for damage patterns in ancient DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 27, 2153-2155 (2011).
16. Briggs, A. W. et al. Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14616-14621 (2007).
17. Hofmanová, Z. et al. Early farmers from across Europe directly descended from Neolithic Aegeans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6886-6891 (2016).
18. Pilot, M. et al. On the origin of mongrels: evolutionary history of free-breeding dogs in Eurasia. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20152189 (2015).
19. Duleba, A., Skonieczna, K., Bogdanowicz, W., Malyarchuk, B. & Grzybowski, T. Complete mitochondrial genome database and standardized classification system for Canis lupus familiaris. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 19, 123-129 (2015).
20. Larson, G. et al. Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8878-8883 (2012).
21. Rasmussen, M. et al. The genome of a Late Pleistocene human from a Clovis burial site in western Montana. Nature 506, 225-229 (2014).
22. Patterson, N. et al. Ancient admixture in human history. Genetics 192, 1065-1093 (2012).
23. Lipson, M. et al. Efficient moment-based inference of admixture parameters and sources of gene flow. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1788-1802 (2013).
24. Bradburd, G., Ralph, P. L. & Coop, G. A spatial framework for understanding population structure and admixture. PLoS Genet. 12, e1005703 (2016).
25. Gronau, I., Hubisz, M. J., Gulko, B., Danko, C. G. & Siepel, A. Bayesian inference of ancient human demography from individual genome sequences. Nat. Genet. 43, 1031-1034 (2011).
26. Freedman, A. H. et al. Genome sequencing highlights the dynamic early history of dogs. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004016 (2014).
27. Fan, Z. et al. Worldwide patterns of genomic variation and admixture in gray wolves. Genome Res. 26, 163-173 (2016).
28. Skoglund, P., Ersmark, E., Palkopoulou, E. & Dalén, L. Ancient wolf genome reveals an early divergence of domestic dog ancestors and admixture into highlatitude breeds. Curr. Biol. 25, 1515-1519 (2015).
29. Song, S., Sliwerska, E., Emery, S. & Kidd, J. M. Modeling human population separation history using physically phased genomes. Genetics 205, 385-395 (2017).
30. Axelsson, E. et al. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature 495, 360-364 (2013).
31. Arendt, M., Fall, T., Lindblad-Toh, K. & Axelsson, E. Amylase activity is associated with AMY2B copy numbers in dog: implications for dog domestication, diet and diabetes. Anim. Genet. 45, 716-722 (2014).
32. Reiter, T., Jagoda, E. & Capellini, T. D. Dietary variation and evolution of gene copy number among dog breeds. PLoS ONE 11, e0148899 (2016).
33. Anderson, T. M. et al. Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves. Science 323, 1339-1343 (2009).
34. Arendt, M., Cairns, K. M., Ballard, J. W. O., Savolainen, P. & Axelsson, E. Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistoric agriculture. Heredity 117, 301-306 (2016).
35. Allentoft, M. E. et al. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522, 167-172 (2015).
36. Ramsey, C. B. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337-360 (2009).
37. Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0-50, 000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869-1887 (2013).
38. MacHugh, D. E., Edwards, C. J., Bailey, J. F., Bancroft, D. R. & Bradley, D. G. The extraction and analysis of ancient DNA from bone and teeth: A survey of current methodologies. Anc. Biomol. 3, 81-102 (2000).
39. Gamba, C. et al. Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory. Nat. Commun. 5, 5257 (2014).
40. Bramanti, B. et al. Genetic discontinuity between local hunter-gatherers and central Europes first farmers. Science 326, 137-140 (2009).
41. Scheu, A. et al. The genetic prehistory of domesticated cattle from their origin to the spread across Europe. BMC Genet. 16, 54 (2015).
42. Kircher, M. Analysis of high-Throughput ancient DNA sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 840, 197-228 (2012).
43. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589-595 (2010).
44. DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498 (2011).
45. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2725-2729 (2013).
46. Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: Analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290 (2004).
47. Patterson, N., Price, A. L. & Reich, D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2, e190 (2006).
48. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655-1664 (2009).
49. Skotte, L., Korneliussen, T. S. & Albrechtsen, A. Estimating individual admixture proportions from next generation sequencing data. Genetics 195, 693-702 (2013).
50. Jones, E. R. et al. Upper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians. Nat. Commun. 6, 8912 (2015).
51. Auton, A. et al. Genetic recombination is targeted towards gene promoter regions in dogs. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003984 (2013).
52. Price, A. L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904-909 (2006).
53. Pavlidis, P. & Noble, W. S. Matrix2png: A utility for visualizing matrix data. Bioinformatics 19, 295-296 (2003).
54. Sudmant, P. H. et al. Diversity of human copy number variation and multicopy genes. Science 330, 641-646 (2010).
55. Alkan, C. et al. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat. Genet. 41, 1061-1067 (2009).
56. Hach, F. et al. mrsFAST: A cache-oblivious algorithm for short-read mapping. Nat. Methods 7, 576-577 (2010).