We can shift academic culture through publishing choices

F1000Research

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages

  Logan, Corina J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic culture; Discrimination; Ethical publishing; Exploitative publishing

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIST;

EID: 85024490477     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.11415.2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Björk BC: The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles-A failed experiment? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2012;63(8):1496-1504. 10.1002/asi.22709
2. Citizen's Advice: Indirect discrimination.2017. Reference Source
3. Bogich T Ballesteros S Berjon R: On the marginal cost of scholarly communication. science.ai.2016. Reference Source
4. Edwards MA Roy S: Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environ Eng Sci. 2017;34(1):51-61. 28115824 10.1089/ees.2016.0223 5206685
5. Eve MP: Referring Elsevier/RELX to the Competition and Markets Authority.2016. Reference Source
6. Falagas ME Alexiou VG: The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008;56(4):223-226. 18661263 10.1007/s00005-008-0024-5
7. Fuchs C Sandoval M: The diamond model of open access publishing: why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. 2013;11(2):428-443. Reference Source
8. Gowers T: Time for Elsexit?2016. Reference Source
9. Husted BW de Jesus Salazar J: Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. J Manage Stud. 2006;43(1):75-91. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00583.x
10. Ioannidis JP: How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10):e1001747. 25334033 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747 4204808
11. Koehlmoos TP Smith R: Big publishers cut access to journals in poor countries. Lancet. 2011;377(9762):273-276. 21322840 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60067-6
12. Laakso M Björk BC: Hybrid open access-A longitudinal study. J Informetrics. 2016;10(4):919-932. 10.1016/j.joi.2016.08.002
13. Lawrence PA: The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;116:617-631. 26970645 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.12.013 4867218
14. McKiernan EC Bourne PE Brown CT: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife. 2016;5: pii: e16800. 27387362 10.7554/eLife.16800 4973366
15. Murray-Rust P: The scholarly poor.2011. Reference Source
16. Nosek BA Bar-Anan Y: Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychol Inq. 2012;23(3):217-243. 10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
17. Nosek BA Spies JR Motyl M: Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(6):615-631. 26168121 10.1177/1745691612459058
18. Pinfield S Salter J Bath PA: The "total cost of publication" in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2015;67(7):1751-1766. 10.1002/asi.23446
19. Research Information Network: Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK.2008. Reference Source
20. Smaldino PE McElreath R: The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3(9):160384. 27703703 10.1098/rsos.160384 5043322
21. Solomon D Björk BC: Article processing charges for open access publication-the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2264. 27547569 10.7717/peerj.2264 4963224
22. Stilgoe J Owen R Macnaghten P: Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy. 2013;42(9):1568-1580. 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
23. Tennant JP Waldner F Jacques DC: The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review. F1000Res. 2016;5:632. 27158456 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 4837983
24. The PLoS Medicine Editors: The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature. PLoS Med. 2006;3(6):e291. 16749869 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 1475651
25. Van Noorden R: Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature. 2013;495(7442):426-9. 23538808 10.1038/495426a
26. Woodward D: A framework for deciding issues in ethics. Library Trends. 1990;39(1-2):8-17. Reference Source