The diamond model of open access publishing: Why policy makers, scholars, universities, libraries, labour unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious

TripleC

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 428-443

  Fuchs, Christian ^a   Sandoval, Marisol ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic knowledge; Commons; Diamond model of open access; Gold model of open access; Green model of open access; Open access publishing; University

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891772449     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1726670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.31269/vol11iss2pp428-443     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Beall, Jeffrey. 2012. Criteria for Determining Predatory Open-Access Publishers. 2nd edition. http://scholarlyoa.com/2012/11/30/criteria-for-determining-predatory-open-access-publishers-2ndedition/ (accessed on September 8, 2013)
2. Bergstrom, Carl T. and Theodore C. Bergstrom. 2002. The Economics of Scholarly Journal Publishing. http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publishing/ (accessed on August 21, 2013).
3. Bergstrom, Carl T. and Theodore C. Bergstrom, Theodore C. 2004. Will Open Access Compete Away Monopoly Profits in Journal Publishing? http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/publishing/BergstromAndBergstrom04b.pdf (accessed on August 21, 2013).
4. Bergstrom, Carl T. and Theodore C. Bergstrom. 2006. The Economics of Ecology Journals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4 (9): 488-495.
5. Darnton, Robert. 2010. The Case for Books. New York: PublicAffairs.
6. European Commission. 2012. Towards Better Access to Scientific Information: Boosting the Benefits of Public Investments in Research. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/era-communication-towardsbetter-access-to-scientific-information_en.pdf (accessed on September 8, 2013)
7. Hall, Gary. 2008. Digitize this Book! The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
8. International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers. 2013. Publishers Support Sustainable Open Access. http://www.stm-assoc.org/publishers-support-sustainable-open-access/ (accessed on July 4, 2013).
9. Merton, Robert K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication System of Science are Considered. Science 159 (3810): 56-63.
10. Merton, Robert K. 1988. The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumlative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. ISIS 79 (4): 606-623.
11. National Union of Journalists. 2012. Open Access Journals and Editorial Quality. http://www.nuj.org.uk/files/Final_open_access_NUJ_briefing.pdf (accessed on July 4, 2013)
12. Research Councils UK (RCUK). 2012. RCUK Policy on Open Access and Supporting Guidance. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUKOpenAccessPolicy.pdf (accessed on September 8, 2013).
13. Sandoval, Marisol and Christian Fuchs. 2010. Towards A Critical Theory of Alternative Media. Telematics and Informatics 27 (2): 141-150.
14. Suber, Peter. 2012. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
15. Suber, Peter. 2013. A Misleading Survey. https://plus.google.com/109377556796183035206/posts/K1UE3XDk9E9 (accessed on September 8, 2013)
16. Thomson Reuters. 2008. Whitepaper: Using Bibliometrics: A Guide to Evaluating Research Performance with Citation Data. http://interest.science.thomsonreuters.com/forms/Verify?doc=http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf&rt=Marketing&sbu=SSR&cid=70170000000I52W&cn=2008-AG-BiblioWhitePaper#1 (accessed on September 8, 2013)
17. UK Publishers Association. 2012. The Publishers Association Comments on Release of the Finch Report on How to Expand Access to Research Publications. http://www.publishersassociation.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2265:the-publishers-association-comments-on-release-of-the-finch-report-on-how-to-expand-access-to-research-publications&catid=503:pa-press-releases-and-comments&Itemid=1618 (accessed on September 8, 2013)
18. Walters, William H. and Anne C. Lindvill. 2011. Characteristics of Open Access Journals in Six Subject Areas. College & Research Libraries 72 (4): 372-392.
19. Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. 2012. Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research Publications. http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf (accessed on September 8, 2013)
21. Wyly, Brandon J. (1998) Competition in Scholarly Publishing? What Publisher Profits Reveal. ARL Newsletter No. 200. http://staff.washington.edu/tabrooks/510.course/ARL/CompetitionPublishing.htm (accessed on August 21, 2013).