Wearables in epilepsy and Parkinson's disease—A focus group study

Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 188-194

  Ozanne, A ^a   Johansson, D ^a   Hallgren Graneheim U ^b,c   Malmgren, K ^a   Bergquist, F ^a   Alt Murphy, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY WEST   (Sweden)

Author keywords

epilepsy; focus group; health professionals; motor activity; movement; Parkinson's disease; qualitative content analysis; wearable sensors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTENT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPILEPSY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARKINSON DISEASE; WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85023741989     PISSN: 00016314     EISSN: 16000404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ane.12798     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data, 2011.
2. Stone AA, Shiffman S, Schwartz JE, Broderick JE, Hufford MR. Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:182-199.
3. Papapetropoulos S. Patient diaries as a clinical endpoint in Parkinson's disease clinical trials. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2012;18:380-387.
4. Beniczky S, Polster T, Kjaer TW, Hjalgrim H. Detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures by a wireless wrist accelerometer: a prospective, multicenter study. Epilepsia. 2013;54:e58-e61.
5. Nijsen TM, Arends JB, Griep PA, Cluitmans PJ. The potential value of three-dimensional accelerometry for detection of motor seizures in severe epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;7:74-84.
6. Schulc E, Unterberger I, Saboor S, et al. Measurement and quantification of generalized tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients by means of accelerometry–an explorative study. Epilepsy Res. 2011;95:173-183.
7. Godinho C, Domingos J, Cunha G, et al. A systematic review of the characteristics and validity of monitoring technologies to assess Parkinson's disease. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:24.
8. Hoppe C, Feldmann M, Blachut B, Surges R, Elger CE, Helmstaedter C. Novel techniques for automated seizure registration: Patients’ wants and needs. Epilepsy Behav. 2015;52:1-7.
9. Fisher JM, Hammerla NY, Rochester L, Andras P, Walker RW. Body-worn sensors in Parkinson's disease: evaluating their acceptability to patients. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:63-69.
10. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: integrating Theory and Practice. Vol 4. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
11. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 5th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2015.
12. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105-112.
13. van Uem JM, Isaacs T, Lewin A, et al. A viewpoint on wearable technology-enabled measurement of wellbeing and health-related quality of life in Parkinson's disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2016;6:279-287.
14. Serrano JA, Larsen F, Isaacs T, et al. Participatory design in Parkinson's research with focus on the symptomatic domains to be measured. J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5:187-196.
15. Espay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB, et al. Technology in Parkinson's disease: challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord. 2016;31:1272-1282.
16. Patel AD, Moss R, Rust SW, et al. Patient-centered design criteria for wearable seizure detection devices. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;64:116-121.
17. Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:334.
18. Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, et al. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des. 2010;21:223-236.
19. Segura Anaya LH, Alsadoon A, Costadopoulos N, Prasad PW. Ethical implications of user perceptions of wearable devices. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8 [Epub ahead of print].
20. Safavi S, Shukur Z. Conceptual privacy framework for health information on wearable device. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114306.
21. Perry MA, Hendrick PA, Hale L, et al. Utility of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer in free living: an investigation of adherence and data loss. Appl Ergon. 2010;41:469-476.
22. Pulliam CL, Burack MA, Heldman DA, Giuffrida JP, Mera TO. Motion sensor dyskinesia assessment during activities of daily living. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4:609-615.
23. Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focusgroup methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:125-132.