Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Segura Anaya, L H ^a   Alsadoon, Abeer ^b   Costadopoulos, N ^b   Prasad, P W C ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Study Group Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

Health; Informed consent; Patients; Privacy; Security; Users; Wearable devices

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALITY; PRIVACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORALS; PRIVACY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85011574068     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: 14715546     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Bjorn, H. (2013). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: A review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 389–406.
2. Camaraa, C. L. (2015). Security and privacy issues in implanfigure wearable device: A comprehensive survey. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 271–289.
3. Carmichael, C. (2014). BNCI systems as a potential assistive technology: Ethical issues and participatory research in the BrainAble project. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 41–47.
4. Chana, M. (2012). Current status and future challenges. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 56, 137–156.
5. Colclasure, S. (2014). Bid data requires a renewal of policies. Privacy Journal, 2–5.
6. Itani, W., Kayssi, A. (2012). Security and privacy in body sensor networks: Challenges, solutions and research directions. In E-Healthcare Systems and Wireless Communications: Current and Future Challenges (pp. 100–127). Information Science References.
7. Jacquemard, T. (2014). Challenges and opportunities of lifelof tecnologies: A literature review and critical analysis. Science and Engineering, 20, 379–409.
8. Kanjo, E., & Al-Husain, L. (2015). Emotions in context: Examining pervasive affective sensing systems, applications, and analyses. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19, 1197–1212.
9. Kapadial, A. (2014). Virtual walls: Protecting digital privacy in pervasive enviroments. Computer Science Journal, 234–256.
10. Kotsios, A. (2015). Privacy in an augmented reality. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 23, 157–185.
11. Novitzky, P. (2014). Challenges and opportunities of lifelog technologies: A literature review and critical analysis. Science and Engineering, 20, 379–409.
12. Page, T. (2015a). Privacy issues surrounding wearable technology. I-Manager’s Journal on Information Technology, 4, 1–16.
13. Page, T. (2015b). A Forecast of the Adoption of Wearable technology. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, 6, 12–29.
14. Safavi, S. (2014). Conecptual privacy framework for health information on wearable devices. Plus One, 9, 9–12.
15. Spring, H. R. (2009). Improving caregivers’ well-being by using technology to manage nighttime activity in persons with dementia. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 2, 39–48.
16. Wagemakers, S., & Van Zoonen, L. (2014). Giving meaning to RFID and cochlear implants. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 33, 73–80.
17. Williams, L. (2010). Wireless mobile medical devices. In Electrical and Computer Engineering Design Handbook (pp. 1–20).
18. Wu, F. (2013). Security analysis and improvement of a privacy authentication scheme for telecare medical information systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 4, 56–67.
19. Yeslam, A.-S. (2015). The use of data mining by private health insurance copmanies and customer’s privacy. Bioethics and Information technology, 24, 281–292.