“Seeing” the difference: The importance of visibility and action as a mark of “authenticity” in co-production: Comment on “collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges”

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 345-348

  Cooke, Jo ^a   Langley, Joe ^b   Wolstenholme, Dan ^c   Hampshaw, Susan ^d  

^a NIHR Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Res Care for Yorkshire and Humber (CLAHRC YH)   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NIHR CLAHRC Yorkshire and Humber   (United Kingdom)

^d DONCASTER METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actionable tools; Co production; Design approaches in healthcare; Knowledge mobilisation; Research impact

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COOPERATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; LEADERSHIP; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85023606382     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23225939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, Stacey D. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4): 221. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.08
2. Boaz A, Hanney S, Jones T, Soper B. Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12): e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415
3. Cooke J, Ariss S, Smith C, et al. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst. 2015;13: 25. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0014-y
4. Boyle D, Slay J, Stephens L. Public services inside out. Putting co-production into practice. London: NESTA; 2010
5. McCabe K, Wallace A, Crosland A. A model for collaborative working to facilitate knowledge mobilisation in public health. Evid Policy. 2015;11(4): 559-576. doi: 10.1332/174426415x14298767491657
6. Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J et al. Research with patient and public involvement: a realist evaluation - the RAPPORT study. Health Serv Deliv Res 2016;3: 38.
7. Ocloo J, Matthews R. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(8): 626-632. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839
8. Robinson K. Out of our Minds. Capstone Publishing; 2011.
9. Tsoukas H, Vladimirou E. What is Organisational Knowledge? J Manage Stud. 2001: 38(7): 972-993. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00268
10. Cross N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
11. Gregory S A. The Design Method. London: Butterworth; 1966.
12. March LJ. The logic of design and the question of value. The Architecture of Form. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1976.
13. Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1969.
14. Hinchcliff R, Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(2): 124-1288. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu009
15. Gauntlett D. Making is connecting; the social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2. London: Polity Press; 2011.
16. Kontos PC, Poland BD. Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implement Sci. 2009;4: 1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1
17. Vink J, Wetter-Edman K, Edvardsson B, Tronvol B. Understanding the influence of the co-design process on well-being. Paper presented at: Serv Des; May 24-26, 2016; Copenhagen.
18. Jayes M, Palmer, R, Enderby P. Development of a mental capacity assessment support tool: a user-centred design process. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(5): 65.
19. Gillard S, Simons L, Turner K, Lucock M, Edwards C. Patient and public involvement in the co-production of knowledge: reflection on the analysis of qualitative data in a mental health study. Qual Health Res. 2012;22: 1126-1137. doi: 10.1177/1049732312448541
20. Fox NJ. Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology. 2011;45(1): 70-85. doi: 10.1177/0038038510387196
21. Oswick C, Robertson M. Boundary objects reconsidered: from bridges and anchors to barricades and mazes. Journal of Change Management. 2009;9(2): 179-193. doi: 10.1080/14697010902879137
22. Kislov R. Boundary discontinuity in a constellation of interconnected practices. Public Adm. 2014;92(2): 307-323. doi: 10.1111/padm.12065
23. McGrath OC, Lingley-Pottie P, Johnson Emberly D, Thurston C, McLean C. Integrated Knowledge Translation in Mental Health: Family Help as an Example. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(1): 30-37.
24. Evans S, Scarbrough H. Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research initiatives: ‘Bridging’ versus ‘blurring’ boundary-spanning approaches in the UK CLAHRC initiative. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106: 119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025
25. Tod A, Lusambili A, Homer C, Abbott J, Cooke J, McDaid K. Understanding factors influencing vulnerable older people keeping warm and well in winter: a qualitative study using social marketing techniques. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4). pii: e000922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000922
26. Best research for best health, implementation plan. NIHR; 2009.
27. Martin GP, Ward V, Hendy J, et al: The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: the case of NIHR CLAHRCs. Evid Policy. 2011;7: 489-509. doi: 10.1332/174426411x603470
28. Walshe K, Davies HT. Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilization. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3): 1-12. doi: 10.1177/1355819613502011
29. D’Andreta D, Scarbrough H, Evans S. The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care initiative within the English National Health Service. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl): 40-52.
30. Currie G, Lockett A, El Enany N. From what we know to what we do: lessons learned from the translational CLAHRC initiative in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl): 27-39. doi: 10.1177/1355819613500484