Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: A three-stage review

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Boaz, Annette ^a   Hanney, Stephen ^b   Jones, Teresa ^b   Soper, Bryony ^b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84960412135     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS. London, 2010.
2. NHS Confederation. Being a good research partner: the virtues and rewards. Briefing 2010.
3. Clarke M, Loudon K. Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review. Trials2011;12:16.
4. Selby P. The impact of the process of clinical research on health service outcomes. Ann Oncol2011;22(Suppl 7):vii2-4.
5. Cohen W, Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic J 1989;99:569-96.
6. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, et al. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. A systematic literature review. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
7. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th edn. New York, NY: Free Press, 2003.
8. Spurgeon P, Mazelan PM, Barwell F. Medical engagement: a crucial underpinning to organizational performance. Health Serv Manage Res 2011;24:114-20.
9. Darbyshire J, Sitzia J, Cameron D, et al. Extending the clinical research network approach to all of healthcare. Ann Oncol2011;22 (Suppl 7):vii36-43.
10. Minasian LM, Carpenter WR, Weiner BJ, et al. Translating research into evidence-based practice: the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Program. Cancer 2010;116:4440-9.
11. Zerhouni E. Medicine. The NIH roadmap. Science 2003;302:63-72.
12. Walshe K, Davies HT Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilization. J Health Serv Res Policy 2013; 18(3 Suppl):1-12.
13. Department of Health. Innovation health and wealth, accelerating adoption and diffusion in the NHS. London, 2011.
14. Kuehlein T, Goetz K, Laux G, et al. Antibiotics in urinary-tract infections. Sustained change in prescribing habits by practice test and self-reflection: a mixed methods before-after study. BMJ Qual Saf2011;20:522-6.
15. Whicher DM, Chalkidou K, Dhalla IA, et al. Comparative effectiveness research in Ontario, Canada: producing relevant and timely information for health care decision makers. MilbankQ 2009;87:585-606.
16. Lomas J. Using 'Linkage and Exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. Health Aff 2000;19:236-40.
17. Denis J, Lomas J. Convergent evolution: the academic and policy roots of collaborative research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8 (Suppl 2):1-6.
18. Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. J Soc Issues 1946;2:34-46.
19. Jagosh J, Macaulay A, Pluye J, et al. Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice. MilbankQ2012;90:311-46.
20. Smee C. Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries. In: Smith P, ed. Improving value for money in the United Kingdom National Health Service: performance measurement and improvement in a centralised system. OECD Publishing, 2002:57-86.
21. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlatt J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanations and elaborations. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
22. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:35.
23. Hanney S, Boaz A, Jones T, et al. Engagement in research: an innovative three stage review of the benefits for health-care performance. Health Serv Deliv Res 2013;1(8).
24. Fowler HW, Fowler FG. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.
25. Du Bois A, Rochon J, Lamparter C, et al. Pattern of care and impact of participation in clinical studies on the outcome in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:183-91.
26. Rochon J, du Bois A. Clinical research in epithelial ovarian cancer and patients' outcome. Ann Oncol 2011;22(Suppl 7):vii16-19.
27. Majumdar SR, Roe MT, Peterson ED, et al. Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:657-62.
28. Pons J, Sais C, Illa C, et al. Is there an association between the quality of hospitals' research and their quality of care? J Health Serv Res Policy 2010;15:204-9.
29. Rich AL, Tata LJ, Free CM, et al. How do patient and hospital features influence outcomes in small-cell lung cancer in England? Br J Cancer 2011;105:746-52.
30. Carpenter WR, Reeder-Hayes K, Bainbridge J, et al. The role of organizational affiliations and research networks in the diffusion of breast cancer treatment innovation. Med Care 2011;49:172-9.
31. Laliberte L, Fennell ML, Papandonatos G. The relationship of membership in research networks to compliance with treatment guidelines for early-stage breast cancer. Med Care 2005;43:471-9.
32. Abraham AJ, Knudsen HK, Rothrauff TC, et al. The adoption of alcohol pharmacotherapies in the Clinical Trials Network: the influence of research network participation. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010;38: 275-83.
33. Ducharme LJ, Knudsen HK, Roman PM, et al. Innovation adoption in substance abuse treatment: exposure, trialability, and the Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007;32:321-9.
34. Knudsen HK, Abraham AJ, Johnson JA, et al. Buprenorphine adoption in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abuse Treat 2009;37:307-12.
35. Chaney EF, Rubenstein LV, Liu C-F, et al. Implementing collaborative care for depression treatment in primary care: a cluster randomized evaluation of a quality improvement practice redesign. Implement Sci 2011;6:121.
36. Goldberg HI, Neighbor WE, Hirsch IB, et al. Evidence-based management: using serial firm trials to improve diabetes care quality. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2002;28:155-66.
37. Hall C, Sigford B, Sayer N. Practice changes associated with the Department of Veterans Affairs' Family Care Collaborative. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(Suppl 1):18-26.
38. Puoane T, Sanders D, Ashworth A, et al. Improving the hospital management of malnourished children by participatory research. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:31.
39. Crilly T, Jashapara A, Ferlie E. Research utilisation & knowledge mobilisation: a scoping review of the literature: report to NIHR SDO programme. 2010.
40. Rochon J, du Bois A, Lange T. Mediation analysis of the relationship between institutional research activity and patient survival. BMC Med Res Methodol2014;14:9.
41. Teal R, Bergmire DM, Johnston M, et al. Implementing community-based provider participation in research: an empirical study. Implement Sci 2012;7:41.
42. Bennett W, Bird J, Burrows S, et al. Does academic output correlate with better mortality rates in NHS trusts in England? Public Health 2012;126:S40-3.
43. Ozdemir BA, Karthikesalingam A, Sinha S, et al. Research Activity and the Association with Mortality. PLoS ONE2015;10(2):e0118253. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118253
44. Cooke J, Ariss S, Smith C, et al. On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: a method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap. Health Res Policy Syst 2015;13:25.
45. Soper B, Hinrichs S, Drabble S, et al. Delivering the aims of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: understanding their strategies and contributions. Health Serv Deliv Res 2015;3:1-208.
46. Pincus HA, Abedin Z, Blank AE, et al. Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards A "Top Ten" List. Eval Health Prof2013;36:411-31.
47. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, et al. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J 1995;153:1423.
48. Boaz A, Baeza J, Fraser A. Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:212.
49. Bernard D, Coburn K, Miani M. Health and disease management within an academic health system. Dis Manag Health Outcomes 2000;7:21-37.
50. Francis J, Perlin JB. Improving performance through knowledge translation in the Veterans Health Administration. J Contin Educ Health Prof2006;26:63-71.
51. Kizer K, Kirsh S. The double edged sword of performance measurement. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:395-7.
52. Bowen S, Martens P, The Need to Know Team. Demystifying knowledge translation: learning from the community. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10:203-11.
53. Kizer KW, Demakis JG, Feussner JR. Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care 2000;38:I7-16.