On-going collaborative priority-setting for research activity: A method of capacity building to reduce the research-practice translational gap

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Cooke, Jo ^a,b,c   Ariss, Steven ^d   Smith, Christine ^e   Read, Jennifer ^d  

^a NIHR Collaboration and Leadership in Applied Health Res Care for Yorkshire and Humber (CLAHRC YH)   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL HALLAMSHIRE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^e BARNSLEY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAPACITY BUILDING; CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; RESEARCH; RESEARCH PRACTICE TRANSLATIONAL GAP; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; COOPERATION; ENGLAND; INTERVIEW; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

CAPACITY BUILDING; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH; STATE MEDICINE; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84929462004     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-015-0014-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Department of Health. Best research for best health, a new national health research strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006.
2. Cooksey D. A review of UK health funding. London: The Stationery Office; 2006.
3. Walshe K, Davies HTO. Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilization. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3):1-12.
4. Caldwell SE, Mays N. Studying policy implementation using a macro, meso and micro frame analysis: the case of the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care (CLAHRC) programme nationally and in North West London. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:32.
5. The National Institute of Health Research. 1.1 The National Institute of Health Research. In Book 1.1. London; 2010.
6. Currie G, Lockett A, El Enany N. From what we know to what we do: lessons learned from the translational CLAHRC initiative in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl):27-39.
7. Soper B, Yaqub O, Hinrichs S, Marjanovich S, Drabble S, Hanney S, et al. CLAHRCs in practice: combined knowledge transfer and exchange strategies, cultural change, and experimentation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 suppl):53-64.
8. Rycroft-Malone J, Wilkinson J, Burton CR, Harvey G, McCormack B, Graham I, et al. Collaborative action around implementation in collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care: towards a programme theory. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl):13-26.
9. Sitthi-Amorn C, Somrongthong R. Strengthening health research capacity in developing countries: a critical element for achieving health equity. BMJ. 2000;321(7264):813-7.
10. Cooke J, Booth A, Nancarrow S, Wilkinson A, Askew D, Mead T. Re:Cap - A scoping review to identify the evidence-base for Research Capacity development in health and social care. Sheffield: Trent Research & Development Support Unit, University of Sheffield; 2006.
11. Nuyens Y. Setting priorities for health research: lessons from low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85(4):319-21.
12. Johnson K, Kennedy SB, Harris AO, Lincoln A, Neace W, Collins D. Strengthening the HIV/AIDS service delivery system in Liberia: an international research capacity-building strategy. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(3):257-73.
13. Lansang MA, Dennis R. Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(10):764-70.
14. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Strengthening health systems. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2004.
15. Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Ndawi B, Hurtig AK. Involving decision-makers in the research process: Challenges of implementing the accountability for reasonableness approach to priority setting at the district level in Tanzania. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(7):760-72.
16. Ghaffar A, IJsselmuiden C, Zicker F. Changing mindsets: research capacity strengthening in low- and middle-income countries. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research and UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases; 2008.
17. Whear R, Thompson-Coon J, Boddy K, Papworth H, Frier J, Stein K. Establishing local priorities for a health research agenda. Health Expect. 2015;18(1):8-21.
18. Dubois RW, Graff JS. Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research: from assessing public health benefits to being open with the public. Health Aff. 2011;30(12):2235-42.
19. McAneney H, McCann JF, Prior L, Wilde J, Kee F. Translating evidence into practice: a shared priority in public health? Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(10):1492-500.
20. Reveiz L, Elias V, Terry RF, Alger J, Becerra-Posada F. Comparison of national health research priority-setting methods and characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002-2012. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;34:1-13.
21. Barnieh L, Jun M, Laupacis A, Manns B, Hemmelgarn B. Determining research priorities through partnership with patients: an overview. Sem Dialysis. 2015;28:141-6.
22. Batchelor JM, Ridd MJ, Clarke T, Ahmed A, Cox M, Crowe S, et al. The Eczema Priority Setting Partnership: a collaboration between patients, carers, clinicians and researchers to identify and prioritize important research questions for the treatment of eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(3):577-82.
23. Davila-Seijo P, Hernández-Martín A, Morcillo-Makow E, de Lucas R, Domínguez E, Romero N, et al. Prioritization of therapy uncertainties in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: where should research direct to? An example of priority setting partnership in very rare disorders. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:61.
24. Tomlinson M, Yasamy MT, Emerson E, Officer A, Richler D, Saxena S. Setting global research priorities for developmental disabilities, including intellectual disabilities and autism. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014;58(12):1121-30.
25. Hindin MJ, Christiansen CS, Ferguson BJ. Setting research priorities for adolescent sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(1):10-8.
26. Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
27. Pawson R. The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.
28. Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Transaction publishers; 1967.
29. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008.
30. Krippendorf K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004.
31. Weber R. Basic content analysis: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1990.
32. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation. London: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.
33. Patton MQ. Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
34. Martin GP, Ward V, Hendy J, Rowley E, Nancarrow S, Heaton J, et al. The challenges of evaluating large-scale, multi-partner programmes: the case of NIHR CLAHRCs. Evid Pol. 2011;7:489-509.
35. D'Andreta D, Scarbrough H, Evans S. The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care initiative within the English National Health Service. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl):40-52.