The reference librarian as non-expert: A postmodern approach to expertise

Reference Librarian

Volumn 42, Issue 87-88, 2004, Pages 273-300

  Stover, Mark ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expertise; Postmodernism; Reference services

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023592078     PISSN: 02763877     EISSN: 15411117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J120v42n87_10     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Pamela J. Hinds, Michael Patterson, and Jeffrey Pfeffer, “Bothered by Abstraction: The Effect of Expertise on Knowledge, ”Journal of Applied Psychology86 (December 2001): 1232-1244.
2. Daniel Bell, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York: Basic Books, 1973
3. Frank Fischer, Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990
4. James Fleck, “Expertise, Knowledge, Power and Tradeability, ” in Exploring Expertise: Issues and Perspectives, ed. Wendy Faulkner, James Fleck and Robin Williams, Basingstoke, England: Macmillan, 1998.
5. Andrew Abbott, “Professionalism and the Future of Librarianship, ” Library Trends 46 (Winter 1998): 430-443
6. Pierce Butler, An Introduction to Library Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1933
7. Jesse Hauk Shera, The Foundations of Education for Librarianship, New York: Becker and Hayes, 1972
8. Orvin Lee Shiflett, Origins of American Academic Librarianship, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981.
9. Charles Derber, William A. Schwartz, Yale Magrass, Power in the Highest Degree: Professionals and the Rise of a New Mandarin Order, New York: Oxford University Press, 1990
10. K. Anders Ericsson, The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games, Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.
11. Taodhg Burns and Shahida Rashid, “The New World of Information Professionalism, ”Information Outlook3 (July 1999): 25-29
12. R.O. Mason, “What Is an Information Professional?” Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 31 (Spring 1990): 122-138
13. Mary Lynn Rice-Lively and J. Drew Racine, “The Role of Academic Librarians in the Era of Information Technology, ”Journal of Academic Librarianship23 (January 1997): 31-41.
14. Lucy M. Rowland, “Libraries and Librarians on the Internet, ”Communication Education43 (April 1994): 144.
15. Harlene Anderson, Conversation, Language, and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy, New York: Basic Books, 1997, 30.
16. Kenneth Gergen, Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
17. Harlene Anderson, “On a Roller Coaster: A Collaborative Language Systems Approach to Therapy, ” in The New Language of Change, ed. Steven Friedman, New York: Guilford Press, 1993, 324.
18. Kenneth Bruffee, “Social Construction, Language, and the Authority of Knowledge: A Bibliographical Essay, ”College English48 (1986): 773-90.
19. Jill Freedman and Gene Combs, Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities, New York: Norton, 1996
20. Robert A. Neimeyer and Jonathan D. Raskin, Constructions of Disorder: Meaning-Making Frameworks for Psychotherapy, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2000
21. Hugh Rosen and Kevin T. Kuehlwein, Constructing Realities: Meaning-Making Perspectives for Psychotherapists, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1996.
22. Dorothy Stroh Becvar and Raphael J. Becvar, Family Therapy: A Systemic Integration, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.
23. Gergen G., Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction, 244.
24. Harlene Anderson and Susan B. Levin, “Generative Conversations: A Postmodern Approach to Conceptualizing and Working With Human Systems, ” in The Handbook of Constructive Therapies: Innovative Approaches From Leading Practitioners, ed. Michael F. Hoyt, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998, 47.
25. Raphael Sassower, Knowledge Without Expertise: On the Status of Scientists, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.
26. Anderson A., Conversation, Language, and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy, 31.
27. Freedman Combs, Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities, 37-38.
28. Fleck F., “Expertise, Knowledge, Power and Tradeability, ” 147.
29. Paul Watzlawick, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson, Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes, New York: Norton, 1967.
30. Robert Welker, “Expertise and the Teacher As Expert: Rethinking a Questionable Metaphor, ” American Educational Research Journal 28 (Spring 1991): 19-35
31. Wilbert E. Moore, The Professions: Roles and Rules, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970
32. Mary Lee Bundy and Paul Wasserman, “Professionalism Reconsidered, ”College and Research Libraries29 (January 1968): 5-26.
33. Lily M. Hoffman, The Politics of Knowledge: Activist Movements in Medicine and Planning, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1989, 6.
34. Eliot Freidson, Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986, 174.
35. Moore M., The Professions: Roles and Rules, 226.
36. Donald A. Schon, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books, 1983, 292.
37. Ericsson E., The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports and Games, 9.
38. Lester Asheim, “Librarians As Professionals, ” Library Trends 27 (Winter 1979): 225-257.
39. Schon S., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.
40. Schon S., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action., 295.
41. Schon S., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action., 296.
42. Harald A. Mieg, The Social Psychology of Expertise: Case Studies in Research, Professional Domains, and Expert Roles, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001, 43.
43. Anderson Levin, “Generative Conversations: A Postmodern Approach to Conceptualizing and Working With Human Systems, ” 47.
44. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ”Families, Systems and Health(1996) 14(2): 194.
45. Katharine Mair, “The Myth of Therapist Expertise, ” in Psychotherapy and Its Discontents, ed. Windy Dryden and Colin Feltham, Buckingham, England: Open University Press, 1992.
46. Freedman Combs, Narrative Therapy: The Social Construction of Preferred Realities, 269-270.
47. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ” 198.
48. Michael White and David Epston, Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends, New York: Norton, 1990.
49. Harlene Anderson and Harold Goolishian, “The Client Is the Expert: A Not-Knowing Approach to Therapy, ” in Therapy As Social Construction, ed. Sheila MacNamee and Kenneth Gergen, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992, 28.
50. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ” 199.
51. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ”., 200.
52. Anderson Goolishian, “The Client Is the Expert: A Not-Knowing Approach to Therapy”
53. Anderson Levin, “Generative Conversations: A Postmodern Approach to Conceptualizing and Working With Human Systems.”
54. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ” 199.
55. Barbara S. Held, Back to Reality: A Critique of Postmodern Theory in Psychotherapy, New York: Norton, 1995, 245.
56. Patrick Ragains, “Evaluation of Academic Librarians’ Instructional Performance: Report of a National Survey, ”Research Strategies15 (1997): 159-75;
57. Charles A. Bunge, “Gathering and Using Patron and Librarian Perceptions of Question-Answering Success, ”The Reference Librarian66 (1999): 115-40.
58. G. T. Anderson, “Dimensions, Context, and Freedom: The Library in the Social Creation of Knowledge, ” in Sociomedia: Multimedia, Hypermedia, and the Social Construction of Knowledge, ed. Edward Barrett, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
59. Bill Crowley, “Tacit Knowledge and Quality Assurance: Bridging the The-ory-Practice Divide, ” in Knowledge Management for the Information Professional, ed. T. Kanti Srikantaiah and Michael E.D. Koenig, Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2000.
60. Bill Crowley, “Tacit Knowledge, Tacit Ignorance, and the Future of Academic Librarianship, ”College & Research Libraries62 (November 2001), 566.
61. Elizabeth H. Wood, “Health Sciences Librarianship in the New Millennium, ” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 19 (Spring 2000): 1-8.
62. E.M. Noam, “Electronics and the Dim Future of the University, ” Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science 22 (June/July 1996): 6-9.
63. E.M. Noam, “Electronics and the Dim Future of the University, ” Bulletin of the American Society of Information Science 22 (June/July 1996), 9.
64. Susan Griswold Blandy, “What to Do Until the Expert Comes: Dealing With Demands for Multicultural, International Information Now, ”The Reference Librarian45-46 (1994): 119-35
65. Lawrence McCrank, “Reference Expertise: Paradigms, Strategies, and Systems, ”The Reference Librarian40 (1993): 11-42
66. Paul Jack Weiss, “Getting the Expert into the System: Expert Systems and Cataloging, ”The Serials Librarian25 (1995): 235-41
67. Danuta A. Nitecki, “Managing Experts: Creating Links Between Librarians, Users, and Systems, ”Journal of Library Administration13 (1990): 59-79
68. Tim Holthoff, “Expert Librarian Applications of Expert Systems to Library Technical Services, ”Technical Services Quarterly7 (1989): 1-16
69. Frederick Frankena and Joann Koelin Frankena, “The Politics of Expertise and the Role of the Librarian, ” Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 6 (Fall-Winter 1986): 37-47
70. Olivia Crosby, “Librarians: Information Experts in the Information Age, ” Occupational Outlook Quarterly 44 (Winter 2000): 2-15.
71. John V. Richardson, Jr., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress, San Diego: Academic Press, 1995.
72. Rory L. Chase, “Knowledge Navigators, ” Information Outlook 2 (September 1998): 17-26
73. Mary Ellen Bates, “The Making of a Super Searcher, ” Searcher 7 (November/December 1999): 33-35
74. Richardson R., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress;
75. Carol Tenopir C., “Are You a Super Searcher?” Library Journal 125 (March 1, 2000): 36-38
76. Glen E. Holt, “Alternative Futures for the Development of Library Science Education: A View From Inside the Library, ” in Education for the Library/Information Profession: Strategies for the Mid-1990s, ed. Patricia G. Reeling (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1993).
77. Beverly P. Lynch, “The Development of the Academic Library in American Higher Education and the Role of the Academic Librarian, ” in Leadership and Academic Librarians, ed. Terrence F. Mech and Gerard B. McCabe, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1998, 19.
78. Michael F. Winter, The Professionalization of Librarianship, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, 1983
79. Rice-Lively Racine, “The Role of Academic Librarians in the Era of Information Technology.”
80. Richardson R., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress, 51.
81. Jesse Hauk Shera, Introduction to Library Science: Basic Elements of Library Service, Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1976
82. F.W. Lancaster, “Future Librarian-ship: Preparing for an Unconventional Career, ” Wilson Library Bulletin 57 (May 1983): 747-753.
83. Diana M. Thomas, Ann T. Hinckley, and Elizabeth R. Eisenbach, The Effective Reference Librarian, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1981; Patrick Wilson, Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977.
84. Wilson W., Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library andInforma-tion Policy.
85. Thomas Childers, “The Test of Reference, ” Library Journal 105 (1980): 924-928
86. Peter Hernon and Charles R. McClure, “Unobtrusive Testing: The 55 Percent Rule, ” Library Journal 111 (April 15, 1986): 37-41.
87. Joan C. Durrance, “Reference Success: Does the 55 Percent Rule Tell the Whole Story?” Library Journal 114 (April 15, 1989): 31-36
88. Jo Bell Whitlatch, “Unobtrusive Studies and the Quality of Academic Reference Services, ”College & Research Libraries50 (March 1989): 181-94
89. Carolyn W Jardine, “Maybe the 55 Percent Rule Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story: A User-Satisfaction Survey, ”College & Research Libraries56 (November 1995): 477-85
90. Loriene Roy, “Reference Accuracy, ” Reference Librarian 49-50 (1995): 217-227
91. John V. Richardson, Jr., “Reference Is Better Than We Thought, ” Library Journal 127 (April 15, 2002): 41-42.
92. Wilson W., Public Knowledge, Private Ignorance: Toward a Library and Information Policy, 102-103.
93. Jo Bell Whitlatch, “Reference Service Effectiveness, ” RQ 30 (Winter 1990): 205-520.
94. Richardson R., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress, 51.
95. Thomas, Hinckley, and Eisenbach E., The Effective Reference Librarian, 5.
96. Jo Bell Whitlatch, Evaluating Reference Services: A Practical Guide, Chicago: American Library Association, 2000.
97. Roma M. Harris and Gillian B. Michell, “The Social Context of Reference Work: Assessing the Effects of Gender and Communication Skill on Observers’ Judgments of Competence, ”Library and Information Science Research8 (January 1986): 85-101.
98. Brian Quinn, “Beyond Efficacy: The Exemplar Librarian As a New Approach to Reference Evaluation, ” Illinois Libraries 76 (Summer 1994): 163-173.
99. Michael F. Winter, The Culture and Control ofExpertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988, 4.
100. Michael F. Winter, The Culture and Control ofExpertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988,., 25.
101. Michael F. Winter, The Culture and Control ofExpertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988,., 24.
102. Michael F. Winter, The Culture and Control ofExpertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1988,., 27.
103. Shera S., Introduction to Library Science: Basic Elements of Library Service.
104. Asheim A., “Librarians As Professionals, ” 249.
105. William J. Goode, “The Librarian: From Occupation to Profession, ”Library Quarterly31 (October 1961): 306-320
106. William Joseph Reeves, Librarians As Professionals: The Occupation’s Impact on Library Work Arrangements, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980.
107. Thomas Gwinup, “The Failure of Librarians to Attain Profession: The Causes, the Consequences, and the Prospect, ”Wilson Library Bulletin48 (February 1974): 482.
108. Asheim A., “Librarians As Professionals, ” 230.
109. Winter W., The Culture and Control of Expertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, 26.
110. Winter W., The Professionalization of Librarianship, 25.
111. Richardson R., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress, 41-42.
112. Gary Marchionini, Information Seeking in Electronic Environments, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
113. Patrick V. Drotos, “Changing With the Times, ”Online18 (January 1994): 54-58.
114. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship, 203-204.
115. California Library Association, “The Future of Librarianship, ” Web page, 1996 [accessed 2 June 2002], Available athttp://www.cla-net.org/pubs/future.html.
116. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship, 199.
117. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship., 202.
118. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship., 202-203.
119. John M. Budd, Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2001, 186-201.
120. Kimmo Tuominen, “User-Centered Discourse: An Analysis of the Subject Positions of the User and the Librarian, ”Library Quarterly67 (October 1997): 352.
121. Gerhard Van der Linde, “Knowledge, Power and the Academic Library in Postmodern Society, ”South African Journal of Library and Information Science58 (September 1990): 249-54.
122. Gary P. Radford, “Flaubert, Foucault, and the Biblotheque Fantastique: Toward a Postmodern Epistemology for Library Science, ” Library Trends46:4 (1998), 621.
123. Anne Marie Candido, “Fabricating and Prefabricating Language: Troubling Trends in Libraries, ”Journal of Academic Librarianship25 (November 1999): 433.
124. Suzanne M. Shultz, “Medical Jargon: Ethnography of Language in a Hospital Library, ” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 15 (Fall 1996): 41-47
125. Rachael Naismith and Joan Stein, “Library Jargon: Student Comprehension of Technical Language Used by Librarians, ”College and Research Libraries50 (September 1989): 543-552.
126. Naismith Stein, “Library Jargon: Student Comprehension of Technical Language Used by Librarians.”
127. Naismith Stein, “Library Jargon: Student Comprehension of Technical Language Used by Librarians., 543.
128. Candido C., “Fabricating and Prefabricating Language: Troubling Trends in Libraries, ” 433.
129. Budd B., Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework, 327.
130. Winter W., The Culture and Control of Expertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, 27-29 and 84-87.
131. Crowley C., “Tacit Knowledge and Quality Assurance: Bridging the Theory-Practice Divide.”
132. Rice-Lively Racine, “The Role of Academic Librarians in the Era of Information Technology, ” 33.
133. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship.
134. Drotos D., “Changing With the Times”
135. Beverly P. Lynch and Kimberley Robles Smith, “The Changing Nature of Work in Academic Libraries, ” College & Research Libraries 62 (September 2001): 407-420
136. Catherine Sheldrick Ross and Patricia Dewdney, “Best Practices: An Analysis of the Best (and Worst) in Fifty-Two Public Library Reference Transactions, ” Public Libraries 33 (September/October 1994): 261-266.
137. Patrick Wilson, Two Kinds of Power: An Essay on Bibliographical Control, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968, 116.
138. Patrick Wilson, Two Kinds of Power: An Essay on Bibliographical Control, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968., 115.
139. Rice-Lively Racine, “The Role of Academic Librarians in the Era of Information Technology, ” 35.
140. Winter W., The Culture and Control of Expertise: Toward a Sociological Understanding of Librarianship, 65-66.
141. Richardson R., Knowledge-Based Systems for General Reference Work: Applications, Problems, and Progress, 24-26.
142. Marshall Eidson, “Using Emotional Intelligence in the Reference Interview, ” Colorado Libraries 26 (Summer 2000): 8-10.
143. Brian Quinn, “How Psychotherapists Handle Difficult Clients: Lessons for Librarians, ”The Reference Librarian75/76 (2002): 181-196.
144. Julie J. McGowan and Elizabeth H. Dow, “Faculty Status and Academic Librarianship: Transformation to a Clinical Model, ”Journal of Academic Librarianship21 (September 1995): 345-350.
145. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ” 195.
146. Bonnie A. Nardi and Vicki O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999, 85.
147. Michele G. Hanson, “Joining the Conversation: Collaborative Learning and Bibliographic Instruction, ”The Reference Librarian51/52 (1995): 147-59.
148. Nardi O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart, 86-87.
149. Nardi O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart,., 89-90.
150. Nardi O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart,., 91.
151. Nardi O’Day, Information Ecologies: Using Technology With Heart,., 92.
152. Michael Gorman, “Values for Human-to-Human Reference, ” Library Trends 50 (Fall 2001): 168-182.
153. Budd B., Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework, 318-319.
154. Michael Gorman, Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century, Chicago: American Library Association, 2000, 81.
155. Welker W., “Expertise and the Teacher As Expert: Rethinking a Questionable Metaphor, ” 34-35.
156. Jean Sheridan, “The Reflective Librarian: Some Observations on Bibliographic Instruction in the Academic Library, ”Journal of Academic Librarianship16 (March 1990): 22-26.
157. Charles A. Bunge, “Beliefs, Attitudes and Values of the Reference Librarian, ”Reference Librarian66 (1999): 19-20.
158. Danuta A. Nitecki, “Changing the Concept and Measure of Service Quality in Academic Libraries, ”Journal of Academic Librarianship22 (May 1996): 181-190.
159. Jardine J., “Maybe the 55 Percent Rule Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story: A User-Satisfaction Survey, ” 478.
160. Syed Saad Andaleeb and Patience L. Simmonds, “Explaining User Satisfaction with Academic Libraries: Strategic Implications, ”College & Research Libraries59 (March 1998): 156-167
161. Elaina Norlin, “Reference Evaluation: A Three-Step Ap-proach-Surveys, Unobtrusive Observations, and Focus Groups at the University of Arizona, ”College & Research Libraries61 (November 2000): 546-553.
162. Darlene E. Weingand, Customer Service Excellence: A Concise Guide for Librarians, Chicago: American Librarian Association, 1997.
163. Carole A. Larson and Laura K. Dickson, “Developing Behavioral Reference Desk Performance Standards, ” RQ 33 (1994): 349-357
164. Marie L. Radford, “Approach or Avoidance? The Role of Nonverbal Communication in the Academic Library User’s Decision to Initiate a Reference Encounter, ” Library Trends 46 (Spring 1998): 699-718.
165. Joan Durrance, “Factors that Influence Reference Success: What Makes Questioners Willing to Return?”The Reference Librarian49/50 (1995): 243-265.
166. Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose (San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1983).
167. Fleck F., “Expertise, Knowledge, Power and Tradeability, ” 147.
168. Shera S., The Foundations of Education for Librarianship, 203-204.
169. Eidson E., “Using Emotional Intelligence in the Reference Interview, ” 8.
170. Daniel Coffey and Karen Lawson, “Managing Meaning: Language and Technology in Academic Libraries, ”College & Research Libraries63 (March 2002): 151-162.
171. David A. Tyckoson, “Wrong Questions, Wrong Answers: Behavioral vs. Factual Evaluation of Reference Service, ” The Reference Librarian 38 (1992): 151-173
172. Jardine J., “Maybe the 55 Percent Rule Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story: A User-Satisfac-tion Survey, ” 477.
173. Tobeylynn Birch and Jan Wilson, “Information-Seeking Behavior of Professional Psychologists, ” presented October 2, 1998, in Santa Monica, CA, at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Mental Health Librarians.
174. Gorman G., “Values for Human-to-Human Reference;” Gorman, Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century.
175. Hanson H., “Joining the Conversation: Collaborative Learning and Bibliographic Instruction, ”147.
176. Tyckoson T., “Wrong Questions, Wrong Answers: Behavioral vs. Factual Evaluation of Reference Service, ”153.
177. Richard E. Bopp and Linda C. Smith, Reference and Information Services: An Introduction, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1995, 42-43.
178. Richard E. Bopp and Linda C. Smith, Reference and Information Services: An Introduction, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1995., 264-265.
179. Bunge B., “Beliefs, Attitudes and Values of the Reference Librarian, ” 19-20.
180. Schon S., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.
181. Schon S., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action., 296-297.
182. Gorman G., Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century, 78
183. Andaleeb Simmonds, 159.
184. McGowan Dow, “Faculty Status and Academic Librarianship: Transformation to a Clinical Model, ” 348.
185. Anderson A., Conversation, Language, and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy.
186. Anderson A., “A Reflection on Client-Professional Collaboration, ” 199.
187. Naismith Stein, “Library Jargon: Student Comprehension of Technical Language Used by Librarians, ” 543.
188. Coffey Lawson, “Managing Meaning: Language and Technology in Academic Libraries, ” 161.
189. Garoogian G., “Values for Human-to-Human Reference, ” 171.
190. Garoogian G. “Library/patron confidentiality.”
191. Garoogian G., “Library/patron confidentiality, ” 231.
192. Rosemary A. Del Vecchio. “Privacy and accountability at the reference desk.”The Reference Librarian, 38 (1992), 134.