The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies

Health Policy

Volumn 121, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 887-894

  Hagenaars, Luc Louis ^a   Jeurissen, Patrick Paulus Theodoor ^a   Klazinga, Niek Sieds ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cross country comparison; Food and nutrition policy; Obesity; Public policy; Sugar sweetened beverages; Taxes

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; ENERGY DENSE FOOD; FISCAL POLICY; FOOD; FOOD INTAKE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; SUGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGE; TAX; UNHEALTHY DIET; BEVERAGE; ECONOMICS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; OBESITY; PUBLIC POLICY;

SWEETENING AGENT;

BEVERAGES; FOOD; HUMANS; OBESITY; PUBLIC POLICY; SWEETENING AGENTS; TAXES;

EID: 85023162280     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.011     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Thow, A.M., Downs, S., Jan, S., A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: understanding the recent evidence. Nutrition Reviews 72:9 (2014), 551–565.
2. Cabrera Escobar, M.A., Veerman, J.L., Tollman, S.M., Bertram, M.Y., Hofman, K.J., Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 13:1 (2013), 1–10.
3. OECD, Obesity and the Economics of Prevention: Fit not Fat. 2010, OECD Publishing, Paris.
4. WHO, Fiscal Policies for Diet and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Technical Meeting Report., 2016, World Health Organization, Geneva.
5. Sassi, F., Belloni, A., Capobianco, C., The Role of Fiscal Policies in Health Promotion. 2013, OECD Publishing, Paris.
6. OECD, Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives. 2015, OECD Publishing, Paris.
7. Hsiao, A., Wang, Y.C., Reducing Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption: Evidence, Policies, and Esugar-Sweetened beverage consumption: evidence, policies, and economics. Current Obesity Reports 2:3 (2013), 191–199.
8. Jou, J., Techakehakij, W., International application of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxation in obesity reduction: factors that may influence policy effectiveness in country-specific contexts. Health Policy 107:1 (2012), 83–90.
9. Green, R., The ethics of sin taxes. Public Health Nursing 28:1 (2011), 68–77.
10. Nestle, M., Food Politics How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. 2013, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
11. Nestle, M., Taking on Big Soda (and Winning). 2015, Oxford University Press, New York.
12. Eyles, H., Mhurchu, C.N., Nghiem, N., Blakely, T., Food pricing strategies, population diets, and non-communicable diseases: a systematic review of simulation studies. PLoS Medicine, 9(12), 2012, e1001353.
13. Green, R., Cornelsen, L., Dangour, A.D., Turner, R., Shankar, B., Mazzocchi, M., et al. The effect of rising food prices on food consumption: systematic review with meta-regression. BMJ, 346, 2013.
14. Andreyeva, T., Chaloupka, F.J., Brownell, K.D., Estimating the potential of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and generate revenue. Preventive Medicine 52:6 (2011), 413–416.
15. Powell, L.M., Chriqui, J.F., Khan, T., Wada, R., Chaloupka, F.J., Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. Obesity Reviews 14:2 (2013), 110–128.
16. Studdert, D.M., Flanders, J., Mello, M.M., Searching for Public Health Law's Sweet Spot: The Regulation of Sugar-sweetened Bpublic health law's sweet spot: the regulation of sugar-Sweetened beverages. PLoS Medicine, 12(7), 2015, e1001848.
17. Buse, K., Mays, N., Walt, G., Making Health Policy. 2nd ed., 2012, Open University Press, Berkshire.
18. Walt, G., Gilson, L., Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy and Planning 9:4 (1994), 353–370.
19. Leichter, H., A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations. 1979, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. WHO, Using price policies to promote healthier diets. 2015, World Health Organisation. Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
21. Thow, A.M., Quested, C., Juventin, L., Kun, R., Khan, A.N., Swinburn, B., Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific: implementation lessons for improving health. Health Promotion International 26:1 (2011), 55–64.
22. Chriqui, J.F., Young, S.K., Food, nutrition, and obesity policy. Moreland-Russell, S., Brownson, R.C., (eds.) Prevention, Policy and Public Health, 2016, Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Carriedo, A., Lock, K., Knai, C., Hawkins, B., A qualitative analysis of the design and implementation of the soda tax in Mexico. European Journal of Public Health, 25(3), 2015, 366.
24. Treasury, H.M., Budget. 2016, H.M Treasury, London, 2016.
25. City of Philadelphia. Bill No. 160176. Amending Title 19 of The Philadelphia Code, entitled Finance, Taxes and Collections, by adding a new Chapter 19–4100, entitled Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax, under certain terms and conditions.: The Council of the City of Philadelphia; 2016.
26. Republic of South Africa, 2017 Budget People's Guide. 2016, National Treasury, Pretoria.
27. Republic of South Africa, Q&A: Tax on Sugary Beverages. 2017, National Treasury, Pretoria.
28. Ortiz, S.E., Zimmerman, F.J., Adler, G.J., Increasing public support for food-industry related, obesity prevention policies: the role of a taste-engineering frame and contextualized values. Social Science & Medicine 156 (2016), 142–153.
29. Stafford, N., Denmark cancels fat tax and shelves sugar tax because of threat of job losses. BMJ, 2012, 2012.
30. Chriqui, J.F., Chaloupka, F.J., Powell, L.M., Eidson, S.S., A typology of beverage taxation: multiple approaches for obesity prevention and obesity prevention-related revenue generation. Journal of Public Health Policy 34:3 (2013), 403–423.
31. Bødker, M., Pisinger, C., Toft, U., Jørgensen, T., The rise and fall of the world's first fat tax. Health Policy 119:6 (2015), 737–742.
32. Makeisten ja jäätelön vero poistetaan vuonna 2017 [press release]. Helsinki : Finnish Government: Economic Policy Committee2015.
33. OECD. Revenue Statistics. Public Sector, Taxation and Regulation. Paris : OECD; 2015.
34. Berardi N, Sevestre P, Tepaut M, Vigneron A. The impact of a ‘soda tax’ on prices. Evidence from French micro data.: Banque de France. Direction Générale des Études et des Relations Internationales; 2012. Contract No.: 415.
35. WHO. Global Health Observatory data repository. Obesity (body mass index > = 30) (age-standardized estimate). Data by country. 2014.
36. CDC, County data indicators. Obesity prevalence, 2012, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
37. CDC, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity: Data, Trends and Maps. 2015, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA.
38. OECD, Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. 2015, OECD, Paris.
39. World Bank. GINI Index (World Bank Estimate). 2015.
40. Bloomberg, Bloomberg Best (and Worst) Most Income Inequalitiy: U.S. Cities. 2014, Bloomberg L.P.
41. Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2015: in detail. 2016, Transparency International, Berlin.
42. Joossens, L., Raw, M., The Tobacco Control Scale 2013 in Europe. 2014, Associations of European Cancer Leagues, Brussels.
43. Anderson, P., Braddick, F., Reynolds, J., Gual, A., Alcohol Policy in Europe: Evidence from AMPHORA. 2012, The AMPHORA project.
44. Mackenbach, J.P., McKee, M., Government, politics and health policy: a quantitative analysis of 30 European countries. Health Policy 119:10 (2015), 1298–1308.
45. Bíró, A., Did the junk food tax make the Hungarians eat healthier. Food Policy 54 (2015), 107–115.
46. Hawkes, N., Sugar tax will double funding for sport in primary schools, says chancellor. BMJ, 352(1602), 2016.
47. Hawkes, N., Soft drink makers consider legal challenge against sugar tax. BMJ, 352, 2016.
48. Juanto, L., Excise duties in Finland in a historical perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law 44 (2003), 146–159.
49. Smed, S., Financial penalties on foods: the fat tax in Denmark. Nutrition Bulletin 37:2 (2012), 142–147.
50. WHO, Public health product tax in Hungary: An example of successful intersectoral action using a fiscal tool to promote healthier food choices and raise revenues for public health. 2015, World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
51. City of Philadelphia, The Mayor's Operating Budget in Brief for Fiscal Year 2017. 2016, City of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
52. Republic of South Africa, 2016 Budget Speech. 2016, National Treasury, Pretoria.
53. http://www.acgov.org/rov/elections/20141104/documents/MeasureD-v6.pdf.
54. Alameda County Registrar of Voters. Nov ember 4, 2014 − General Election. Measure D 2014 [Available from
55. City Council of Philadelphia, City Council gives preliminary approval to beverage tax increase Philadelhia. 2016 [cited 2016 June 8]. Available from: http://phlcouncil.com/council-preliminary-approval-to-beverage-tax.
56. UK Parliament, Public Health England and Jamie Oliver discuss childhood obesity strategy. 2015, Health Committee, UK Parliament, London [Available from: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/health-committee/news-parliament-20151/childhood-obesity-strategy-second-evidence-session-15-16/.
57. Landon, J., Graff, H., What is the role of health-related food duties. National Heart Forum 2012, 2012, National Heart Forum, London.
58. KPMG. Taxing your sweet tooth. Effective nudge or economic burden? May 2016.
59. Oksman, O., Philadelphia soda tax passed with help of a new sell: to raise funds for pre-K. The Guardian(June (20)), 2016.
60. Zillman, C., Coca-Cola zero is rebranding itself in the UK as Britain adopts a sugar tax. Fortune, 2016 April, 20.
61. Falbe, J., Thompson, H.R., Becker, C.M., Rojas, N., McCulloch, C.E., Madsen, K.A., Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. American Journal of Public Health 106:10 (2016), 1865–1871.
62. Cawley, J., Frisvold, D.E., The pass-through of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to retail prices: the case of Berkeley, California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36:2 (2016), 303–326.
63. City of Berkeley. Ordinance no. #,### − N.S. Imposing a General Tax on the Distribution of Suger-Sweetened Beverage Products. City Council; 2014.
64. OECD, Health Statistics. 2015, OECD Publishing, Paris.
65. Colchero, M.A., Salgado, J.C., Unar-Munguía, M., Hernández-Ávila, M., Rivera-Dommarco, J.A., Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico. Economics & Human Biology 19 (2015), 129–137.
66. Falbe, J., Rojas, N., Grummon, A.H., Madsen, K.A., Higher retail prices of sugar-sweetened beverages 3 months after implementation of an excise tax in Berkeley, california. American Journal of Public Health 105:11 (2015), 2194–2201.
67. Ng, S.W., Silver, L., Ryan-Ibarra, S., Induni, M., Hamma, C., Poti, J., et al. Berkeley Evaluation of Soda Tax (BEST) Study Preliminary Findings. 2015, Public Health Institute & University of North Carolina, Oakland November 3.
68. Jensen, J.D., Smed, S., The Danish tax on saturated fat −Short run effects on consumption, substitution patterns and consumer prices of fats. Food Policy 42 (2013), 18–31.
69. Bødker, M., Pisinger, C., Toft, U., Jørgensen, T., The Danish fat tax—Effects on consumption patterns and risk of ischaemic heart disease. Preventive Medicine 77 (2015), 200–203.
70. WHO, Assessment of the Impact of a Public Health Product Tax. 2015, World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, Budapest.
71. Colchero, M.A., Popkin, B.M., Rivera, J.A., Ng, S.W., Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ, 352, 2016, h6704.
72. Batis, C., Rivera, J.A., Popkin, B.M., Taillie, L.S., First-year evaluation of Mexico's tax on nonessential energy-dense foods: an observational study. PLoS Medicine, 13(7), 2016, e1002057.
73. Silver, L.D., Ng, S.W., Ryan-Ibarra, S., Taillie, L.S., Induni, M., Miles, D.R., et al. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California,US: A before-and-after study. PLOS Medicine, 14(4), 2017, e1002283.
74. Somji, A., Nixon, L., Mejia, P., Aziz, A., Arbatman, L., Dorfman, L., Soda tax debates in Berkeley and San Fransisco: An analysis of social media, campaign materials and news coverage. 2016, Berkeley Media Studies Group.
75. Watts, R.A., Heiss, S., Moser, M., Kolodinsky, J., Johnson, R.K., Tobacco taxes vs soda taxes: a case study of a framing debate in vermont. Health Behavior and Policy Review 1:3 (2014), 191–196.
76. Varvasovszky, Z., Brugha, R., A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning 15:3 (2000), 338–345.
77. Jensen, J.D., Smed, S., The Danish tax on saturated fat: Short run effects on consumption and consumer prices of fats. 2012, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
78. Meyer, N., Political contestation of self-regulation in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of European Public Policy 20:5 (2013), 760–776.