Improvement of a digital impression with conventional materials: Overcoming intraoral scanner limitations

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 373-376

  Mandelli, Federico ^a,b   Ferrini, Francesco ^b   Gastaldi, Giorgio ^b   Gherlone, Enrico ^b   Ferrari, Marco ^c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^e TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; HUMAN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; HUMANS;

EID: 85022032956     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.5138     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(suppl):7S-13S.
2. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
3. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of allceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010; 38:553-559.
4. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions-An in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011; 14:11-21.
5. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression techniques. A randomized clinical trial. J Prosthodont 2016; 25:282-287.
6. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of completearch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-128.
7. Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-321.
8. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-1764.
9. Finger WJ, Kurokawa R, Takahashi H, Komatsu M. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: A new in vitro testing method. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1655-1660.
10. McCabe JF, Arikawa H. Rheological properties of elastomeric impression materials before and during setting. J Dent Res 1998;77:1874-1880.
11. Loi I, Di Felice A. Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): A new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 2013;8:10-23.
12. Lee JH. Intraoral digital impression for fabricating a replica of an implantsupported interim prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:145-149.
13. Mandelli F, Ferrini F, Capparè P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone E. Further applications of intraoral scanners: Digital duplication of functionalized crowns and bridges. Dent Cadmos 2016;84:388-394.