Further applications of intraoral scanners: digital duplication of functionalized crowns and bridges;Ulteriori applicazioni degli scanner intraorali: duplicazione di corone e ponti provvisori funzionalizzati

Dental Cadmos

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 388-394

  Mandelli, F ^a   Ferrini, F ^a   Cappare P ^a   Gastaldi, G ^a   Gherlone, E ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bridges; Crowns; Digital impression; Fixed prosthesis; Interim prosthesis

Indexed keywords

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; HUMAN; ITALY; MARKET; MOUTH; ORTHODONTICS; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84977668262     PISSN: 00118524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0011-8524(16)30080-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 1. Mörmann, W.H., The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc(137 Suppl), 2006, 7–13S.
2. 2. Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mörmann, W., Attin, T., Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12:1 (2009), 11–28.
3. 3. Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B., Brodesser, J., Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:7 (2010), 553–559.
4. 4. Ender, A., Mehl, A., Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109:2 (2013), 121–128.
5. 5. Gherlone, E., Mandelli, F., Capparè, P., Pantaleo, G., Traini, T., Ferrini, F., A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J Dent 42:9 (2014), 1151–1155.
6. 6. Ting-Shu, S., Jian, S., Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 24:4 (2015), 313–321.
7. 7. Poticny, D.J., Klim, J., CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 141:Suppl 2 (2010), 5–9S.
8. 8. da Costa, J.B., Pelogia, F., Hagedorn, B., Ferracane, J.L., Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 35:3 (2010), 324–329.
9. 9. van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D., Ren, Y., Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One, 7(8), 2012, e43312.
10. 10. Giménez, B., Özcan, M., Martinez-Rus, F., Pradíes, G., Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:4 (2014), 853–862.
11. 11. Lee, S.J., Gallucci, G.O., Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:1 (2013), 111–115.
12. 12. Patzelt, S.B., Lamprinos, C., Stampf, S., Att, W., The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145:6 (2014), 542–551.
13. 13. Güth, J.F., Almeida, E., Silva, J.S., Ramberger, M., Beuer, F., Edelhoff, D., Treatment concept with CAD/CAM-fabricated high-density polymer temporary restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 24:5 (2012), 310–318.
14. 14. Loi, I., Di Felice, A., Biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT): a new approach for prosthetic restoration of periodontically healthy teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent 8:1 (2013), 10–23.