Improving sequence to sequence learning for morphological inflection generation: The biu-mit systems for the SIGMORPHON 2016 shared task for morphological reinflection

Proceedings of the 14th SIGMORPHON Workshop on Computational Research in Phonetics, Phonology, and Morphology, SIGMORPHON 2016 at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 41-48

  Aharoni, Roee ^a   Goldberg, Yoav ^a   Belinkov, Yonatan ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS;

CHARACTER REPRESENTATIONS; EMBEDDINGS; MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; PARTICIPATING TEAMS; RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK ARCHITECTURES; SEQUENCE LEARNING; SUBTASK; THIRD PLACES;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 85021684264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Malin Ahlberg, Markus Forsberg, and Mans Hulden. 2015. Paradigm classification in supervised learning of morphology. In Rada Mihalcea, Joyce Yue Chai, and Anoop Sarkar, editors, HLT-NAACL, pages 1024-1029. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. CoRR, abs/1409.0473.
3. Ryan Cotterell, Christo Kirov, John Sylak-Glassman, David Yarowsky, Jason Eisner, and Mans Hulden. 2016. The SIGMORPHON 2016 shared task-morphological reinflection. In Proceedings of the 2016 Meeting of SIGMORPHON, Berlin, Germany, August. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Markus Dreyer and Jason Eisner. 2011. Discovering morphological paradigms from plain text using a dirichlet process mixture model. In EMNLP, pages 616-627. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Greg Durrett and John DeNero. 2013. Supervised learning of complete morphological paradigms. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1185-1195, Atlanta, Georgia, June. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Manaal Faruqui, Yulia Tsvetkov, Graham Neubig, and Chris Dyer. 2016. Morphological inflection generation using character sequence to sequence learning. In NAACL HLT 2016, The 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, San Diego, California, USA, June 12 - June 17, 2016.
7. A. Graves and J. Schmidhuber. 2005. Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures. Neural Networks, 18(5-6):602-610.
8. Jiatao Gu, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Victor OK Li. 2016. Incorporating copying mechanism in sequence-to-sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06393.
9. Mans Hulden, Markus Forsberg, and Malin Ahlberg. 2014. Semi-supervised learning of morphological paradigms and lexicons. In Gosse Bouma and Yannick Parmentier 0001, editors, EACL, pages 569-578. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Katharina Kann and Hinrich Schütze. 2016. Single-model encoder-decoder with explicit morphological representation for reinflection. In ACL, Berlin, Germany, August. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
11. Ronald M. Kaplan and Martin Kay. 1994. Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics, 20(3):331-378.
12. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.
13. Kimmo Koskenniemi. 1983. Two-level morphology: A general computational model of word-form recognition and production. Technical Report Publication No. 11, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.
14. Garrett Nicolai, Colin Cherry, and Grzegorz Kondrak. 2015. Inflection generation as discriminative string transduction. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 922-931, Denver, Colorado, May-June. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Pushpendre Rastogi, Ryan Cotterell, and Jason Eisner. 2016. Weighting finite-state transductions with neural context. In Proc. of NAACL.
16. Katsuhito Sudoh, Shinsuke Mori, and Masaaki Nagata. 2013. Noise-aware character alignment for bootstrapping statistical machine transliteration from bilingual corpora. In EMNLP, pages 204-209. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V. Le. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Zoubin Ghahramani, Max Welling, Corinna Cortes, Neil D. Lawrence, and Kilian Q. Weinberger, editors, NIPS, pages 3104-3112.
18. David Yarowsky and Richard Wicentowski. 2000. Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment. In ACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics.