Paradigm classification in supervised learning of morphology

NAACL HLT 2015 - 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 1024-1029

  Ahlberg, Malin ^a   Forsberg, Markus ^a   Hulden, Mans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; MACHINE LEARNING; MORPHOLOGY;

DISCRIMINATIVE CLASSIFIERS; GENERAL METHOD; HIGH-ACCURACY; LONGEST COMMON SUBSEQUENCES; MORPHOLOGICAL PATTERNS; NON-PROBABILISTIC; PARADIGM LEARNING;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84949839549     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-1107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Malin Ahlberg, Markus Forsberg, and Mans Hulden. 2014. Semi-supervised learning of morphological paradigms and lexicons. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 569-578, Gothenburg, Sweden. Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. John J. Camilleri. 2013. A computational grammar and lexicon for Maltese. Master's thesis, Chalmers University of Technology. Gothenburg, Sweden.
3. Liviu P Dinu, Vlad Niculae, and Octavia-Maria Şulea. 2012. Learning how to conjugate the Romanian verb: rules for regular and partially irregular verbs. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 524-528. Association for Computational Linguistics.
4. Markus Dreyer and Jason Eisner. 2011. Discovering morphological paradigms from plain text using a Dirichlet process mixture model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 616-627. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Greg Durrett and John DeNero. 2013. Supervised learning of complete morphological paradigms. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 1185-1195.
6. Ramy Eskander, Nizar Habash, and Owen Rambow. 2013. Automatic extraction of morphological lexicons from morphologically annotated corpora. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1032-1043. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Rong-En Fan, Kai-Wei Chang, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Xiang-Rui Wang, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2008. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:1871-1874.
8. Chih-Wei Hsu, Chih-Chung Chang, Chih-Jen Lin, et al. 2003. A practical guide to support vector classification.
9. Mans Hulden. 2014. Generalizing inflection tables into paradigms with finite state operations. In Proceedings of the 2014 Joint Meeting of SIGMORPHON and SIGFSM, pages 29-36. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. Jackson L Lee and John A Goldsmith. 2014. Complexity across morphological paradigms: a minimum description length approach to identifying inflectional stems. In Poster at the MorphologyFest: Symposium on Morphological Complexity, Indiana University, Bloomington.
11. Lluís Padró and Evgeny Stanilovsky. 2012. Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012), Istanbul, Turkey, May. ELRA.
12. Drahomíra Spoustová, Jan Hajič, Jan Votrubec, Pavel Krbec, and Pavel Květoň. 2007. The best of two worlds: Cooperation of statistical and rule-based taggers for Czech. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Balto-Slavonic Natural Language Processing, pages 67-74.
13. Kristina Toutanova and Colin Cherry. 2009. A global model for joint lemmatization and part-of-speech prediction. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP: Volume 1-Volume 1, pages 486-494. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Huihsin Tseng, Daniel Jurafsky, and Christopher Manning. 2005. Morphological features help POS tagging of unknown words across language varieties. In Proceedings of the fourth SIGHAN workshop on Chinese language processing, pages 32-39.