Semi-supervised learning of morphological paradigms and lexicons

14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2014, EACL 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 569-578

  Ahlberg, Malin ^a   Forsberg, Markus ^a   Hulden, Mans ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; SUPERVISED LEARNING;

FINNISH; FORM ACCURACY; HUMAN-READABLE; LEXICAL RESOURCES; SEMI-SUPERVISED; SEMI-SUPERVISED LEARNING; SWEDISHS; TEXT CORPORA;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84905690484     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Lars Borin, Markus Forsberg, and Lennart Lonngren. 2013. SALDO: A touch of yin to WordNet's yang. Language Resources and Evaluation, May. Online first publication; DOI 10.1007/s10579-013-9233-4.
2. Erwin Chan. 2006. Learning probabilistic paradigms for morphology in a latent class model. In Proceedings of the Eighth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Phonology and Morphology, pages 69-78. Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. Lionel Cl'ement, Bernard Lang, Benoît Sagot, et al. 2004. Morphology based automatic acquisition of large-coverage lexica. In LREC 04, pages 1841- 1844.
4. Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2007. Unsupervised models for morpheme segmentation and morphology learning. ACM Transactions on Speech and Language Processing (TSLP), 4(1):3.
5. Gr'egoire D'etrez and Aarne Ranta. 2012. Smart paradigms and the predictability and complexity of inflectional morphology. In Proceedings of the 13th EACL, pages 645-653. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Markus Dreyer and Jason Eisner. 2011. Discovering morphological paradigms from plain text using a Dirichlet process mixture model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 616-627. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Greg Durrett and John DeNero. 2013. Supervised learning of complete morphological paradigms. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 1185-1195.
8. Ramy Eskander, Nizar Habash, and Owen Rambow. 2013. Automatic extraction of morphological lexicons from morphologically annotated corpora. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1032-1043. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Markus Forsberg, Harald Hammarstrom, and Aarne Ranta. 2006. Morphological lexicon extraction from raw text data. In Advances in Natural Language Processing, pages 488-499. Springer.
10. John Goldsmith. 2001. Unsupervised learning of the morphology of a natural language. Computational linguistics, 27(2):153-198.
11. Harald Hammarstrom and Lars Borin. 2011. Unsupervised learning of morphology. Computational Linguistics, 37(2):309-350.
12. Charles F Hockett. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Morphology: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, 1:110-138.
13. Mans Hulden. 2009. Foma: A finite-state compiler and library. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstrations Session, pages 29-32, Athens, Greece. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Kimmo Koskenniemi. 1991. A discovery procedure for two-level phonology. Computational Lexicology and Lexicography: A Special Issue Dedicated to Bernard Quemada, 1:451-46.
15. Kimmo Koskenniemi. 2013. An informal discovery procedure for two-level rules. Journal of Language Modelling, 1(1):155-188.
16. Krister Lind'en. 2008. A probabilistic model for guessing base forms of new words by analogy. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 106-116. Springer.
17. David Maier. 1978. The complexity of some problems on subsequences and supersequences. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 25(2):322-336.
18. Peter H. Matthews. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge University Press.
19. Christian Monson, Jaime Carbonell, Alon Lavie, and Lori Levin. 2008. Paramor: finding paradigms across morphology. In Advances in Multilingual and Multimodal Information Retrieval, pages 900- 907. Springer.
20. Sylvain Neuvel and Sean A Fulop. 2002. Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 workshop on Morphological and phonological learning-Volume 6, pages 31-40. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Robert H Robins. 1959. In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society, 58(1):116-144.
22. Patrick Schone and Daniel Jurafsky. 2001. Knowledge-free induction of inflectional morphologies. In Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies, pages 1-9. Association for Computational Linguistics.
23. Gregory T. Stump. 2001. A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge University Press.
24. Tzvetan Tchoukalov, Christian Monson, and Brian Roark. 2010. Morphological analysis by multiple sequence alignment. In Multilingual Information Access Evaluation I. Text Retrieval Experiments, pages 666-673. Springer.
25. Pieter Theron and Ian Cloete. 1997. Automatic acquisition of two-level morphological rules. In Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing, pages 103-110. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Antal van den Bosch and Walter Daelemans. 1999. Memory-based morphological analysis. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 285-292. Association for Computational Linguistics.
27. David Yarowsky and Richard Wicentowski. 2000. Minimally supervised morphological analysis by multimodal alignment. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 207-216. Association for Computational Linguistics.