A new era for intervention development studies

Pilot and Feasibility Studies

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Hoddinott, Pat ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021280523     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20555784     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s40814-015-0032-0     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Medical Research Council. 2008;1-39. https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/
2. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156-65.
3. National Institute of health Research Glossary Available at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/glossary?result_1655_result_page=I (Accessed 24/8/2015)
4. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
5. Murray J, Williams B, Hoskins G, Skar S, McGhee J, Treweek S, Sniehotta FF, Sheikh A, Brown G, Hagen S, Cameron L, Jones C, Gauld D: An interdisciplinary approach to developing visually mediated interventions to change behaviour; an asthma and physical activity intervention exemplar. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2015, in press.
6. Yardley L, Ainsworth B, Arden-Close E, Muller I: The person-based approach to enhancing the acceptability and feasibility of interventions pilot and feasibility studies 2015, in press.
7. Lancaster GA. Pilot and feasibility studies come of age! Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2015;1(1):1.
8. Medical Research Council Public Health Intervention Development Scheme. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk/funding/browse/public-health-intervention-development-scheme-phind/ (Accessed 24/8/2015)
9. Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Alexiou GA, Gouvias TC, Ioannidis JP. Medicine. Life cycle of translational research for medical interventions. Science. 2008;321(5894):1298-9.
10. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group, Cochrane Bias Methods Group. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available at: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ (Accessed 24/8/2015)
11. de Bruin M, McCambridge J, Prins JM. Reducing the risk of bias in health behaviour change trials: improving trial design, reporting or bias assessment criteria? A review and case study. Psychol Health. 2015;30(1):8-34.
12. Popper K: The logic of scientific discovery: Routledge Classics; 2005. ISBN: 9780415278447.
13. Kahneman D: Thinking, fast and slow: Penguin; 2011. ISBN: 9780141033570.
14. Jick TD. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(4):602-11.
15. Janis I. Groupthink: psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes: first ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1982.
16. Hoddinott P, Allan K, Avenell A, Britten J. Group interventions to improve health outcomes: a framework for their design and delivery. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):800.
17. Surowiecki J. The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few. London. Abacus: New Edition; 2005.
18. Ioannidis JP, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, Khoury MJ, Macleod MR, Moher D, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. The Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166-75.
19. Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V. Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review. 2014;8(1):1-7.
20. Lathia N, Rachuri KK, Mascolo C, Rentfrow PJ. Contextual dissonance: Design bias in sensor-based experience sampling methods. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: ACM; 2013. Available at: http://128.232.0.20/~cm542/papers/ubicomp2013.pdf (Accessed 24/8/2015)
21. Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R: Qualitative research practice: A guide for social sciencestudents and researchers. London: Sage Publications; 2013. ISBN: 978-0-7619-7110-8.
22. Wells M, Williams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 2012;13(1):95-111.
23. Asch DA, Rosin R. Innovation as discipline, not fad. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(7):592-4.
24. Lathia N, Pejovic V, Rachuri KK, Mascolo C, Musolesi M, Rentfrow PJ. Smartphones for large-scale behavior change interventions. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 2013;3:66-73.
25. Morrison B, Lilford R. How can action research apply to health services? Qual Health Res. 2001;11(4):436-49.
26. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013;0:1-9.
27. Glasziou PP, Chalmers I, Green S, Michie S. Intervention synthesis: a missing link between a systematic review and practical treatment(s). PLoS Med. 2014;11(8), e1001690.
28. Hoddinott P, Seyara R, Marais D. Global evidence synthesis and UK idiosyncrasy: why have recent UK trials had no significant effects on breastfeeding rates? Maternal & Child Nutrition. 2011;7:221-7.
29. Robertson C, Archibald D, Avenell A, Douglas F, Hoddinott P, Boyers D, Stewart F, Boachie C, Fioratou E, Wilkins D: Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men. 2014, 18 (35).
30. Blaikie N: Designing social research: Polity Press, Cambridge, 2009. p24-29. ISBN: 978-0-7456-1767-1.
31. Greenhalgh T. What is this knowledge that we seek to "exchange"? Milbank Q. 2010;88(4):492-9.