Publication and reporting of test accuracy studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical Chemistry

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 651-659

  Korevaar, Daniël A ^a   Ochodo, Eleanor A ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M M ^a   Hooft, Lotty ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; EMBASE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PUBLICATION; REGISTER;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84897537551     PISSN: 00099147     EISSN: 15308561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.218149     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263: 1385-9. (Pubitemid 20069945)
2. Sutton AJ, Egger M, Moher D. Addressing reporting biases. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
3. Song F, Parekh-Bhurke S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder JJ, Sutton AJ et al. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:79.
4. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457-65. (Pubitemid 38669189)
5. Sridharan L, Greenland P. Editorial policies and publication bias: the importance of negative studies. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1022-3.
6. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990;263:1405-8. (Pubitemid 20069949)
7. McGauran N, Wieseler B, Kreis J, Schuler YB, Kolsch H, Kaiser T. Reporting bias in medical research: A narrative review. Trials 2010;11:37.
8. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R et al. Clinical trial registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004;292: 1363-4. (Pubitemid 39223230)
9. Dickersin K, Rennie D. The evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterprise. JAMA 2012;307:1861- 4.
10. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias: An updated review. PLoS One 2013;8: e66844.
11. Brazzelli M, Lewis SC, Deeks JJ, Sandercock PA. No evidence of bias in the process of publication of diagnostic accuracy studies in stroke submitted as abstracts. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:425-30.
12. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58: 882-93. (Pubitemid 41115772)
13. Rifai N, Altman DG, Bossuyt PM. Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action. Clin Chem 2008;54:1101-3. (Pubitemid 352009682)
14. Bourgeois FT, Murthy S, Mandl KD. Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in Clinical- Trials.gov. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:158-66.
15. Ross JS, Mulvey GK, Hines EM, Nissen SE, Krumholz HM. Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: A cross-sectional analysis. PloS Med 2009;6:e1000144.
16. van de Wetering FT, Scholten RJ, Haring T, Clarke M, Hooft L. Trial registration numbers are underreported in biomedical publications. PLoS One 2012;7:e49599.
17. Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, Xu H, Zhou L, Krumholz HM. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ 2012;344:d7292.
18. Gordon D, Taddei-Peters W, Mascette A, Antman M, Kaufmann PG, Lauer MS. Publication of trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1926 -34.
19. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009;302:977-84.
20. Hannink G, Gooszen HG, Rovers MM. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions. Ann Surg 2013;257:818-23.
21. Ochodo EA, de Haan MC, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of "spin." Radiology 2013;267:581-8.
22. Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Prospective registration of marker evaluation studies: time to act. Clin Chem 2011;57:1684-6.
23. Reitsma JB, Moons KG, Bossuyt PM, Linnet K. Systematic reviews of studies quantifying the accuracy of diagnostic tests and markers. Clin Chem 2012;58:1534-45.