Is there an association between stard statement adherence and citation rate?

Radiology

Volumn 280, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 62-67

  Marc, Dilauro ^a   Matthew, D F McInnes ^a   Daniël, A Korevaar ^c   Van Der Pol Christian, B ^a   William, Petrcich ^b   Stefan, Walther ^d   Jeffrey, Quon ^a   Darya, Kurowecki ^a   Patrick, M M Bossuyt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CITATION ANALYSIS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTOCOL COMPLIANCE; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; STANDARDS FOR REPORTING OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); DIAGNOSTIC TEST; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS;

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84975229695     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151384     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282(11):1061-1066.
2. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research: getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274(8):645-651.
3. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005;235(2):347-353.
4. Wilczynski NL. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: no change since STARD statement publication-before-andafter study. Radiology 2008;248(3):817- 823.
5. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(1):W1-W12.
6. STARD statement: The STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies. http://www.stard-statement.org. Published 2008. Accessed May 3, 2015.
7. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved? Neurology 2006;67(5):792-797.
8. Korevaar DA, Wang J, van Enst WA, et al. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology 2015;274(3):781-789.
9. Korevaar DA, van Enst WA, Spijker R, Bossuyt PM, Hooft L. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD. Evid Based Med 2014; 19(2):47-54.
10. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955;122(3159): 108-111.
11. Garfield E. Journal impact factor: A brief review. CMAJ 1999;161(8):979-980.
12. Saha S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc 2003;91(1):42-46.
13. Zupanc GK. Impact beyond the impact factor. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2014;200(2):113-116.
14. Casadevall A, Fang FC. Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. MBio 2014;5(2):e00064-14. [Published correction appears in MBio 2014;5(3):e01342-14.].
15. van der Pol CB, McInnes MD, Petrcich W, Tunis AS, Hanna R. Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates? Plos One 2015;10(3):e0119892.
16. Filion KB, Pless IB. Factors related to the frequency of citation of epidemiologic publications. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2008;5:3.
17. Kulkarni AV, Busse JW, Shams I. Characteristics associated with citation rate of the medical literature. Plos One 2007;2(5): E403.
18. Areia M, Soares M, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: Where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements? Endoscopy 2010;42(2):138-147.
19. Freeman K, Szczepura A, Osipenko L. Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping tests: A systematic review of the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy in published studies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;142(2):91-98.
20. Gómez Sáez N, Hernández-Aguado I, Lumbreras B. Observacional study: Evaluation of the diagnostic research methodology in Spain after STARD publication [in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 2009;133(8):302-310.
21. Selman TJ, Morris RK, Zamora J, Khan KS. The quality of reporting of primary test accuracy studies in obstetrics and gynaecology: Application of the STARD criteria. BMC Womens Health 2011;11:8.
22. Zafar A, Khan GI, Siddiqui MA. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: A systematic review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008;36(6):537-542.
23. Maclean EN, Stone IS, Ceelen F, Garcia-lbeniz X, Sommer WH, Petersen SE. Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: Analysis of the impact of STARD criteria. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15(6):691-700.
24. Walther S, Schueler S, Tackmann R, Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Compliance with STARD checklist among studies of coronary CT angiography: systematic review. Radiology 2014;271(1):74-86.
25. Tunis AS, McInnes MD, Hanna R, Esmail K. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Radiology 2013;269(2):413-426.
26. Ochodo EA, Bossuyt PM. Reporting the accuracy of diagnostic tests: The STARD initiative 10 years on. Clin Chem 2013;59(6):917- 919.