Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: Analysis of the impact of STARD criteria

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 691-700

  MacLean, Edd N ^a   Stone, Ian S ^a   Ceelen, Felix ^b   Garcia Albeniz, Xabier ^c   Sommer, Wieland H ^b   Petersen, Steffen E ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic accuracy; Reporting quality; STARD

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARD; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE STANDARDS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84901281615     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: 20472412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet277     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Iglehart JK. Health insurers and medical-imaging policy-a work in progress. N Engl J Med 2009;360: 1030-7.
2. Smith-BindmanR, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, FlynnMet al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 2012;307: 2400-9.
3. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, IrwigLMet al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003;138: 40-4.
4. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM et al. The STARDstatement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44: 639-50.
5. Vandenbroucke JP. STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK. . . and CONSORT: For whom does the guideline toll? J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62: 594-6.
6. Areia M, Soares M, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: Where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements? Endoscopy 2010;42: 138-47.
7. Johnson ZK, Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2007;114: 1607-12.
8. Siddiqui MA, Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in ophthalmic journals. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89: 261-5.
9. Selman TJ, Khan KS, Mann CH. An evidence-based approach to test accuracy studies in gynecologic oncology: The 'STARD' checklist. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96: 575-8.
10. Smidt N, Rutjes AW, van der Windt DA, Ostelo RW, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB et al. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved? Neurology 2006;67: 792-7.
11. Wilczynski NL. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: No change since STARD statement publication-before-and-after study. Radiology 2008;248: 817-23.
12. Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PLoS ONE 2012;7: E35621.