Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: Supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Harris, Claire ^a,b   Allen, Kelly ^a,b   Waller, Cara ^b   Dyer, Tim ^b   Brooke, Vanessa ^b   Garrubba, Marie ^b   Melder, Angela ^b   Voutier, Catherine ^b   Gust, Anthony ^b   Farjou, Dina ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b SOUTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Capacity building; Data; Decision making; Disinvestment; Evidence; Implementation; Information needs; Needs analysis; Needs assessment; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY BUILDING; CASE REPORT; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSULTATION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; FUNDING; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STAFF; AUSTRALIA; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

AUSTRALIA; CAPACITY BUILDING; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 85021157599     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2388-8     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Harris C, Green S, Ramsey W, Allen K, King R. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 1: Introducing a series of papers reporting an investigation of disinvestment in a local healthcare setting BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2210-7.
2. Harris C, Allen K, Waller C, Dyer T, King R, Ramsey W. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 11: Reporting outcomes of an evidence-driven approach to disinvestment in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; in press
3. Harris C, Allen K, King R, Ramsey W, Kelly C, Thiagarajan M. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: Identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare setting BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2211-6.
4. Harris C, Allen K, Waller C, Brooke V. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 3: Examining how resource allocation decisions are made, implemented and evaluated in a local healthcare setting BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2207-2.
5. Harris C, Ko H, Waller C, Sloss P, Williams P. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 4: Exploring opportunities and methods for consumer engagement in resource allocation in a local healthcare setting BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2212-5.
6. Harris C, Allen K, Waller C, Green S, King R, Ramsey W et al. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 5: Developing a model for evidence-driven resource allocation in the local healthcare setting BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2208-1.
7. Harris C, Allen K, Brooke V, Dyer T, Waller C, King R et al. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: Investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting. BMC health services research. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2269-1.
8. Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e005834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005834.
9. Ellen ME, Leon G, Bouchard G, Ouimet M, Grimshaw JM, Lavis JN. Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0179-8.
10. Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
11. Nutley T, Reynolds HW. Improving the use of health data for health system strengthening. Glob Health Action. 2013;6:20001. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20001.
12. Solomons NM, Spross JA. Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag. 2011;19(1):109-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x.
13. Harris C, Garrubba M, Allen K, King R, Kelly C, Thiagarajan M, et al. Development, implementation and evaluation of an evidence-based program for introduction of new health technologies and clinical practices in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1178-4.
14. Gagliardi AR, Majewski C, Victor JC, Baker GR. Quality improvement capacity: a survey of hospital quality managers. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(1):27-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029967.
15. Tricco AC, Cardoso R, Thomas SM, Motiwala S, Sullivan S, Kealey MR, et al. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0370-1.
16. Mayer J, Nachtnebel A. Disinvesting from ineffective technologies: lessons learned from current programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015:1-8. doi: 10.1017/s0266462315000641.
17. Gerdvilaite J, Nachtnebel A. Disinvestment: overview of disinvestment experiences and challenges in selected countries. HTA- Projektbericht., vol nr. 57. Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Health Technology Assessment; 2011.
18. Daniels T, Williams I, Robinson S, Spence K. Tackling disinvestment in health care services. The views of resource allocators in the English NHS. J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(6):762-80.
19. Hollingworth W, Rooshenas L, Busby J, Hine CE, Badrinath P, Whiting PF, et al. Using clinical practice variations as a method for commissioners and clinicians to identify and prioritise opportunities for disinvestment in health care: a cross-sectional study, systematic reviews and qualitative study. Southampton: Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO; 2015. p. 2015.
20. Rooshenas L, Owen-Smith A, Hollingworth W, Badrinath P, Beynon C, Donovan JL. »I won't call it rationing.»: an ethnographic study of healthcare disinvestment in theory and practice. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:273-81. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.020.
21. Leggett L, MacKean G, Noseworthy T, Sutherland L, Clement F. Current status of health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: survey and key informant interviews. Health Res Policy Sys. 2012; doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-38.
22. Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2008;86(2-3):129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.11.010.
23. Niven DJ, Mrklas KJ, Holodinsky JK, Straus SE, Hemmelgarn BR, Jeffs LP, et al. Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review. BMC Med. 2015;13:255. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0488-z.
24. Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL et al. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada. 2015;35(3):47-53.
25. Harris C, Garrubba M, Melder A, Voutier C, Waller C, King R, et al. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 8: Developing, implementing and evaluating an Evidence Dissemination Service in a local healthcare setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; in press
26. Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009;4:40. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40.
27. Douet L, Milne R, Anstee S, Habens F, Young A, Wright D. The completeness of intervention descriptions in published National Institute of Health Research HTA-funded trials: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(1):e003713. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003713.
28. Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, Huby G, Avery A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
29. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):544-59.
30. Gilson L. Health Policy and Systems Research: A Methodology Reader. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/alliancehpsr-reader.pdf. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
31. Yin R. Case study research, design and method. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2009.
32. Harris C, Turner T, Wilkinson F. SEAchange: Guide to a pragmatic evidence-based approach to Sustainable, Effective and Appropriate change in health services. 2015. Available from: http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/1225377. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
33. Meyer J. Qualitative research in health care. Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ. 2000;320(7228):178-81.
34. Meyer J. Evaluating action research. Age Ageing. 2000;29(Suppl 2):8-10.
35. NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 8. QSR International Pty Ltd. 2008. http://www.qsrinternational.com /. Accessed 13 June 2017.
36. Centre for Clinical Effectiveness. Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE): Evaluation and Research Plan. Southern Health 2009. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/Sustainability-in-Healthcare-by-Allocating-Resources-Effectively-SHARE-Evaluation-and-Research-Plan/3979575. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
37. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(5):688-94. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl081.
38. Ramos KD, Schafer S, Tracz SM. Validation of the Fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ. 2003;326(7384):319-21.
39. Clarke MA, Belden JL, Koopman RJ, Steege LM, Moore JL, Canfield SM, et al. Information needs and information-seeking behaviour analysis of primary care physicians and nurses: a literature review. Health Inf Libr J. 2013;30(3):178-90. doi: 10.1111/hir.12036.
40. Gilman IP. Evidence-based information-seeking behaviors of occupational therapists: a survey of recent graduates. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011;99(4):307-10.
41. O'Leary DF, Mhaolrunaigh SN. Information-seeking behaviour of nurses: where is information sought and what processes are followed? J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(2):379-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05750.x.
42. Kostagiolas PA, Aggelopoulou VA, Niakas D. A study of the information seeking behaviour of hospital pharmacists: empirical evidence from Greece. Health Inf Libr J. 2011;28(4):302-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00963.x.
43. Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Inf Libr J. 2010;27(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00883.x.
44. Kloda LA, Bartlett JC. Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(3):194-202.
45. Prendiville TW, Saunders J, Fitzsimons J. The information-seeking behaviour of paediatricians accessing web-based resources. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(8):633-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.149278.
46. Nail-Chiwetalu B, Bernstein RN. An assessment of the information-seeking abilities and needs of practicing speech-language pathologists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007;95(2):182-188, e56-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.2.182.
47. Kosteniuk JG, Morgan DG, D'Arcy CK. Use and perceptions of information among family physicians: sources considered accessible, relevant, and reliable. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013;101(1):32-7. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.1.006.
48. Hider PN, Griffin G, Walker M, Coughlan E. The information-seeking behavior of clinical staff in a large health care organization. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(1):47-50. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.009.
49. Davies K, Harrison J. The information-seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidence. Health Inf Libr J. 2007;24(2):78-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00713.x.
50. Coumou HC, Meijman FJ. How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006;94(1):55-60.
51. Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71(1):9-15.
52. Evans BA, Snooks H, Howson H, Davies M. How hard can it be to include research evidence and evaluation in local health policy implementation? Results from a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2013;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-17.
53. Finch E, Cornwell P, Ward EC, McPhail SM. Factors influencing research engagement: research interest, confidence and experience in an Australian speech-language pathology workforce. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:144.
54. Nutley T. Improving data use in decision making: an intervention to strengthen health systems. 2012.
55. Duckett S, Breadon P, Romanes D, Fennessy P, Nolan J. Questionable care: Stopping ineffective treatments. Grattan Institute 2015. Available from: http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/828-Questionable-Care3.pdf. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
56. Mitton C, Dionne F, Donaldson C. Managing healthcare budgets in times of austerity: the role of program budgeting and marginal analysis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014;12(2):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0074-5.
57. Polisena J, Clifford T, Elshaug AG, Mitton C, Russell E, Skidmore B. Case studies that illustrate disinvestment and resource allocation decision-making processes in health care: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):174-84. doi: 10.1017/s0266462313000068.
58. Henshall C, Schuller T, Mardhani-Bayne L. Using health technology assessment to support optimal use of technologies in current practice: the challenge of "disinvestment". Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(3):203-10. doi: 10.1017/s0266462312000372.
59. Robinson S, Williams I, Dickinson H, Freeman T, Rumbold B. Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: evidence from the English experience. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.014.
60. Jorm L. Routinely collected data as a strategic resource for research: priorities for methods and workforce. Public health research & practice. 2015;25(4):e2541540. doi: 10.17061/phrp2541540.
61. Cornelissen E, Mitton C, Davidson A, Reid RC, Hole R, Visockas AM et al. Changing priority setting practice: The role of implementation in practice change. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.04.010.
62. van Panhuis WG, Paul P, Emerson C, Grefenstette J, Wilder R, Herbst AJ, et al. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144.
63. LaRocca R, Yost J, Dobbins M, Ciliska D, Butt M. The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:751. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751.
64. Marks L, Weatherly H, Mason A. Prioritizing investment in public health and health equity: what can commissioners do? Public Health. 2013;127(5):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.027.
65. Braa J, Heywood A, Sahay S. Improving quality and use of data through data-use workshops: Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(5):379-84. doi: 10.2471/blt.11.099580.
66. Wallace J, Nwosu B, Clarke M. Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers' perceptions. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220.
67. Moore G, Redman S, Haines M, Todd A. What works to increase the use of research in population health policy and programmes: a review. Evidence and Policy. 2011;7(3):277-305. doi: 10.1332/174426411X579199.
68. Gagliardi AR. »more bang for the buck»: exploring optimal approaches for guideline implementation through interviews with international developers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:404. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-404.
69. MacKean G, Noseworthy T, Elshaug AG, Leggett L, Littlejohns P, Berezanski J, et al. Health technology reassessment: the art of the possible. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(04):418-23. doi: 10.1017/S0266462313000494.
70. Schmidt DE. The development of a disinvestment framework to guide resource allocation decisions in health service delivery organizations. The University of British Columbia 2010. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0073252. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
71. Elshaug AG, Hiller JE, Tunis SR, Moss JR. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. Australia and New Zealand health policy. 2007;4:23. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-4-23.
72. Williams I, McIver S, Moore D, Bryan S. The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision making: A review and empirical investigation. Health Technol Assess; 2008;12(7).
73. Larmour I, Pignataro S, Barned KL, Mantas S, Korman MG. A therapeutic equivalence program: evidence-based promotion of more efficient use of medicines. Med J Aust. 2011;194(12):631-4.
74. Smith AB, Semler L, Rehman EA, Haddad ZG, Ahmadzadeh KL, Crellin SJ, et al. A cross-sectional study of medical student knowledge of evidence-based medicine as measured by the Fresno test of evidence-based medicine. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(5):759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.02.006.
75. Thomas RE, Kreptul D. Systematic review of evidence-based medicine tests for family physician residents. Fam Med. 2015;47(2):101-17.
76. Robert G, Harlock J, Williams I. Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0123-y.
77. Haas M, Hall J, Viney R, Gallego G. Breaking up is hard to do: why disinvestment in medical technology is harder than investment. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(2):148-52. doi: 10.1071/AH11032.
78. Ibargoyen-Roteta N, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Asua J. Guiding the process of health technology disinvestment. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2010;98(2-3):218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.06.018.
79. Bryan S, Mitton C, Donaldson C. Breaking the addiction to technology adoption. Health Econ. 2014;23(4):379-83. doi: 10.1002/hec.3034.
80. Stafinski T, Menon D, McCabe C, Philippon DJ. To fund or not to fund: development of a decision-making framework for the coverage of new health technologies. PharmacoEconomics. 2011;29(9):771-80. doi: 10.2165/11539840-000000000-00000.
81. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The OECD Health Project: Health Technologies and Decision Making. OECD Publishing 2005. Available from: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/health-technologies-and-decision-making-9789264016224-en#page1. Accessed: 13 June 2017.
82. Revere D, Turner AM, Madhavan A, Rambo N, Bugni PF, Kimball A, et al. Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(4):410-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2006.12.008.
83. Boivin A, Lehoux P, Lacombe R, Burgers J, Grol R. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial. Implementation science: IS. 2014;9:24. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-24.
84. Robinson S, Glasby J, Allen K. It ain't what you do it's the way that you do it': lessons for health care from decommissioning of older people's services. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(6):614-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12046.
85. Donaldson C, Bate A, Mitton C, Dionne F, Ruta D. Rational disinvestment. QJM. 2010;103(10):801-7. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq086.
86. Gifford W, Davies B, Edwards N, Griffin P, Lybanon V. Managerial leadership for nurses' use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature. Worldviews on evidence-based nursing / Sigma Theta Tau International, Honor Society of Nursing. 2007;4(3):126-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00095.x.
87. Ibargoyen-Roteta N, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Asua J. Report on the development of the GuNFT Guideline. Guideline for Not Funding existing health Technologies in health care systems. Quality Plan for the NHS of the MHSP: Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment (Osteba), 2009.
88. Bowers B, Cohen LW, Elliot AE, Grabowski DC, Fishman NW, Sharkey SS, et al. Creating and supporting a mixed methods health services research team. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6 Pt 2):2157-80. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12118.
89. Cilenti D, Brownson RC, Umble K, Erwin PC, Summers R. Information-seeking behaviors and other factors contributing to successful implementation of evidence-based practices in local health departments. Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP. 2012;18(6):571-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825ce8e2.
90. Garner S, Docherty M, Somner J, Sharma T, Choudhury M, Clarke M, et al. Reducing ineffective practice: challenges in identifying low-value health care using Cochrane systematic reviews. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(1):6-12. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.012044.
91. Vest JR, Kirk HM, Issel LM. Quality and integration of public health information systems: a systematic review focused on immunization and vital records systems. Online journal of public health informatics. 2012;4(2). doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v4i2.4198.
92. Giles-Corti B, Sallis JF, Sugiyama T, Frank LD, Lowe M, Owen N. Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention. J Public Health Policy. 2015;36(2):231-43. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2014.53.
93. HealthPACT. Disinvestment in Australia and New Zealand. Health Policy Advisory Committee on Technology 2013. Available from: http://www.health.qld.gov.au/healthpact/docs/papers/workshop/disinvestment-report.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2017.
94. Hughes E, McKenny K. Decommissioning and disinvestment toolkit 2013-2014 Rayleigh. Essex: Castle Point and Rochford Clinical Commissioning Group; 2013.
95. Watt AM, Hiller JE, Braunack-Mayer AJ, Moss JR, Buchan H, Wale J, et al. The ASTUTE health study protocol: deliberative stakeholder engagements to inform implementation approaches to healthcare disinvestment. Implement Sci. 2012;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-101.
96. Murthy L, Shepperd S, Clarke MJ, Garner SE, Lavis JN, Perrier L, et al. Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2012;9:CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.
97. Wallace J, Byrne C, Clarke M. Making evidence more wanted: a systematic review of facilitators to enhance the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10(4):338-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00288.x.
98. Perrier L, Mrklas K, Lavis JN, Straus SE. Interventions encouraging the use of systematic reviews by health policymakers and managers: a systematic review. Implementation science: IS. 2011;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-43.
99. Young T, Rohwer A, Volmink J, Clarke M. What are the effects of teaching evidence-based health care (EBHC)? Overview of Systematic Reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086706.
100. Hotchkiss DR, Diana ML, Foreit KG. How can routine health information systems improve health systems functioning in low- and middle-income countries? Assessing the evidence base. Advances in health care management. 2012;12:25-58.
101. Fiander M, McGowan J, Grad R, Pluye P, Hannes K, Labrecque M, et al. Interventions to increase the use of electronic health information by healthcare practitioners to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online). 2015;3:CD004749. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004749.pub3.
102. Peacock SJ, Mitton C, Ruta D, Donaldson C, Bate A, Hedden L. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(5):539-52. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.66.
103. Flodgren G, Rojas-Reyes MX, Cole N, Foxcroft DR. Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online). 2012;2:CD002212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002212.pub2.
104. Karkos B, Peters K. A magnet community hospital: fewer barriers to nursing research utilization. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(7-8):377-82.
105. Rubenfeld GD. Cost-effective critical care: cost containment and rationing. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;33(4):413-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322411.
106. Brown CE, Wickline MA, Ecoff L, Glaser D. Nursing practice, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers to evidence-based practice at an academic medical center. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):371-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04878.x.
107. Okun S, McGraw D, Stang P, Larson E, Goldmann D, Kupersmith J, et al. Making the case for continuous learning from routinely collected data. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2013.
108. Martelli N, Lelong AS, Prognon P, Pineau J. Hospital-based health technology assessment for innovative medical devices in university hospitals and the role of hospital pharmacists: learning from international experience. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29(2):185-91. doi: 10.1017/s0266462313000019.
109. Battista RN, Cote B, Hodge MJ, Husereau D. Health technology assessment in Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(Suppl 1):53-60. doi: 10.1017/s0266462309090424.
110. Freedman AM, Kuester SA, Jernigan J. Evaluating public health resources: what happens when funding disappears? Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E190. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.130130.
111. National Health and Medical Research Council. Ethical considerations in quality assurance and evaluation activities. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2014.