메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 75, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2386-2393

Priority-setting and rationing in healthcare: Evidence from the English experience

Author keywords

Decision making; Disinvestment; England; Healthcare; Primary care; Priority setting; Rationing; Resource allocation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE; INCENTIVE; LEADERSHIP; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 84869503650     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: 18735347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.014     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (84)

References (49)
  • 1
    • 0038293333 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes
    • Abelson J., Forest P.-G., Eyles J., Smith P., Martin E., Gauvin F.-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine 2003, 57(2):239-251.
    • (2003) Social Science & Medicine , vol.57 , Issue.2 , pp. 239-251
    • Abelson, J.1    Forest, P.-G.2    Eyles, J.3    Smith, P.4    Martin, E.5    Gauvin, F.-P.6
  • 4
    • 0031217084 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers
    • Daniels N., Sabin J.E. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1997, 26(4):303-350.
    • (1997) Philosophy and Public Affairs , vol.26 , Issue.4 , pp. 303-350
    • Daniels, N.1    Sabin, J.E.2
  • 8
    • 84869498560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Department of Health
    • The Stationery Office, London
    • Department of Health Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS 2010, The Stationery Office, London.
    • (2010) Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS
  • 9
    • 84870657458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Department of Health
    • The Stationery Office, London
    • Department of Health NHS Comparators 2010, The Stationery Office, London. http://www.nhscomparators.nhs.uk.
    • (2010) NHS Comparators
  • 12
    • 79961048438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Resource scarcity and priority-setting: from management to leadership in the rationing of health care?
    • Dickinson H., Freeman T., Williams I., Robinson S. Resource scarcity and priority-setting: from management to leadership in the rationing of health care?. Public Money and Management 2011, 5:363-370.
    • (2011) Public Money and Management , vol.5 , pp. 363-370
    • Dickinson, H.1    Freeman, T.2    Williams, I.3    Robinson, S.4
  • 13
    • 0025718494 scopus 로고
    • Needs assessment, priority-setting and contracts for health care: an economic view
    • Donaldson C., Mooney G. Needs assessment, priority-setting and contracts for health care: an economic view. British Medical Journal 1991, 303(6816):1529-1530.
    • (1991) British Medical Journal , vol.303 , Issue.6816 , pp. 1529-1530
    • Donaldson, C.1    Mooney, G.2
  • 14
    • 46749134440 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions
    • Drummond M.F., et al. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2008, 24(3):244-258.
    • (2008) International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 244-258
    • Drummond, M.F.1
  • 17
    • 41449109453 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Beyond accountability for reasonableness
    • Friedman A. Beyond accountability for reasonableness. Bioethics 2008, 22(2):101-112.
    • (2008) Bioethics , vol.22 , Issue.2 , pp. 101-112
    • Friedman, A.1
  • 18
    • 18744381829 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations
    • Gibson J.L., Martin D.K., Singer P.A. Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations. Healthcare Quarterly 2005, 8(2):50-59.
    • (2005) Healthcare Quarterly , vol.8 , Issue.2 , pp. 50-59
    • Gibson, J.L.1    Martin, D.K.2    Singer, P.A.3
  • 19
    • 0006595418 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • International experiences of rationing (or priority setting)
    • Open University Press, Buckingham, A. Coulter, C. Ham (Eds.)
    • Ham C., Coulter A. International experiences of rationing (or priority setting). The global challenge of health care rationing 2000, Open University Press, Buckingham. A. Coulter, C. Ham (Eds.).
    • (2000) The global challenge of health care rationing
    • Ham, C.1    Coulter, A.2
  • 23
    • 16544386269 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based management in the NHS: is it possible?
    • Hewison A. Evidence-based management in the NHS: is it possible?. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2004, 18(5):336-348.
    • (2004) Journal of Health Organization and Management , vol.18 , Issue.5 , pp. 336-348
    • Hewison, A.1
  • 24
    • 0032505636 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority-setting in health care
    • Holm S. Goodbye to the simple solutions: the second phase of priority-setting in health care. British Medical Journal 1998, 317:1000-1002.
    • (1998) British Medical Journal , vol.317 , pp. 1000-1002
    • Holm, S.1
  • 25
    • 59649123093 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority-setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
    • Kapiriri L., Norheim O.F., Martin D.K. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority-setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 68:766-773.
    • (2009) Social Science & Medicine , vol.68 , pp. 766-773
    • Kapiriri, L.1    Norheim, O.F.2    Martin, D.K.3
  • 26
    • 0008344883 scopus 로고
    • A quality of life approach to resource allocation
    • The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, M. Strosberg (Ed.)
    • Kaplan R. A quality of life approach to resource allocation. Rationing America's medical care: The Oregan plan and beyond 1992, Vol. 2:222-234. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. M. Strosberg (Ed.).
    • (1992) Rationing America's medical care: The Oregan plan and beyond , vol.2 , pp. 222-234
    • Kaplan, R.1
  • 27
    • 0003267355 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Setting priorities: what is holding us back - inadequate information or inadequate institutions?
    • Open University Press, Buckingham, A. Coulter, C. Ham (Eds.)
    • Klein R., Williams A. Setting priorities: what is holding us back - inadequate information or inadequate institutions?. The global challenge of health care rationing 2000, Open University Press, Buckingham. A. Coulter, C. Ham (Eds.).
    • (2000) The global challenge of health care rationing
    • Klein, R.1    Williams, A.2
  • 31
    • 67650459120 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public participation in health care priority-setting: a scoping review
    • Mitton C., Smith N., Peacock S., McEvoy B., Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority-setting: a scoping review. Health Policy 2009, 91:219-228.
    • (2009) Health Policy , vol.91 , pp. 219-228
    • Mitton, C.1    Smith, N.2    Peacock, S.3    McEvoy, B.4    Abelson, J.5
  • 32
    • 0034666820 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The evidence based approach in health policy and health care delivery
    • Niessen L.W., Grijseels E.W.M., Rutten F.H. The evidence based approach in health policy and health care delivery. Social Science & Medicine 2000, 51(6):859-869.
    • (2000) Social Science & Medicine , vol.51 , Issue.6 , pp. 859-869
    • Niessen, L.W.1    Grijseels, E.W.M.2    Rutten, F.H.3
  • 34
    • 68949202383 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overcoming barriers to priority-setting using interdisciplinary methods
    • Peacock S., Mitton C., Bate A., McCoy B., Donaldson C. Overcoming barriers to priority-setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy 2009, 92(2):124-132.
    • (2009) Health Policy , vol.92 , Issue.2 , pp. 124-132
    • Peacock, S.1    Mitton, C.2    Bate, A.3    McCoy, B.4    Donaldson, C.5
  • 36
    • 33748760325 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leadership and priority-setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs
    • 24-23
    • Reeleder D., Goel V., Singer P.A., Martin D.K. Leadership and priority-setting: the perspective of hospital CEOs. Health Policy 2006, 79(1). 24-23.
    • (2006) Health Policy , vol.79 , Issue.1
    • Reeleder, D.1    Goel, V.2    Singer, P.A.3    Martin, D.K.4
  • 37
    • 84869404491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Structures and processes for priority-setting by healthcare funders: a national survey of primary care trusts in England
    • Robinson, S., Dickinson, H., Freeman, T., Rumbold, B., & Williams, I. Structures and processes for priority-setting by healthcare funders: a national survey of primary care trusts in England. Health Services Management Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/hsmr.2012.012007.
    • Health Services Management Research
    • Robinson, S.1    Dickinson, H.2    Freeman, T.3    Rumbold, B.4    Williams, I.5
  • 38
    • 79951779857 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Disinvestment in health - the challenges facing general practitioner (GP) commissioners
    • Robinson S., Dickinson H., Freeman T., Williams I. Disinvestment in health - the challenges facing general practitioner (GP) commissioners. Public Money and Management 2011, 31(2):145-148.
    • (2011) Public Money and Management , vol.31 , Issue.2 , pp. 145-148
    • Robinson, S.1    Dickinson, H.2    Freeman, T.3    Williams, I.4
  • 40
    • 39649107943 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priority-setting in health care: lessons from the experiences of eight countries
    • Sabik L.M., Lie R.K. Priority-setting in health care: lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal for Equity and Health 2008, 7:4.
    • (2008) International Journal for Equity and Health , vol.7 , pp. 4
    • Sabik, L.M.1    Lie, R.K.2
  • 41
    • 62449234658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priority-setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority-setting
    • Sibbald S.L., Singer P.A., Upshur R., Martin D.K. Priority-setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority-setting. BMC Health Services Research 2009, 9(43).
    • (2009) BMC Health Services Research , vol.9 , Issue.43
    • Sibbald, S.L.1    Singer, P.A.2    Upshur, R.3    Martin, D.K.4
  • 42
    • 0034715912 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priority-setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study
    • Singer P.A., Martin D.K., Giacomini M., Purdy L. Priority-setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. British Medical Journal 2000, 321(7272):1316-1318.
    • (2000) British Medical Journal , vol.321 , Issue.7272 , pp. 1316-1318
    • Singer, P.A.1    Martin, D.K.2    Giacomini, M.3    Purdy, L.4
  • 43
    • 0042972945 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A technocratic fix to the " legitimacy problem" ? The Blair government and health care rationing in the United Kingdom
    • Syrett K. A technocratic fix to the " legitimacy problem" ? The Blair government and health care rationing in the United Kingdom. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003, 28(7272):715-732.
    • (2003) Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , vol.28 , Issue.7272 , pp. 715-732
    • Syrett, K.1
  • 45
    • 35348923427 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 'Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision-making in England: findings from research
    • Williams I.P., Bryan S. 'Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision-making in England: findings from research. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 65(10):2116-2129.
    • (2007) Social Science & Medicine , vol.65 , Issue.10 , pp. 2116-2129
    • Williams, I.P.1    Bryan, S.2
  • 47
    • 19944422418 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public administrators' trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts
    • Yang K. Public administrators' trust in citizens: a missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review 2005, 65(3):273-285.
    • (2005) Public Administration Review , vol.65 , Issue.3 , pp. 273-285
    • Yang, K.1
  • 48
    • 0032879720 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Incorporating ethics in priority setting: a case study of a rational health board in Canada
    • Yeo M., Williams J.R., Hooper W. Incorporating ethics in priority setting: a case study of a rational health board in Canada. Health Care Analysis 1999, 7:177-194.
    • (1999) Health Care Analysis , vol.7 , pp. 177-194
    • Yeo, M.1    Williams, J.R.2    Hooper, W.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.