Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death

Gastroenterology

Volumn 153, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 98-105

  Kaminski, Michal F ^a,b,c   Wieszczy, Paulina ^a,b   Rupinski, Maciej ^a,b   Wojciechowska, Urszula ^a   Didkowska, Joanna ^a   Kraszewska, Ewa ^b   Kobiela, Jaroslaw ^b,d   Franczyk, Robert ^a,b   Rupinska, Maria ^a,b   Kocot, Bartlomiej ^b   Chaber Ciopinska, Anna ^a,b   Pachlewski, Jacek ^a   Polkowski, Marcin ^a,b   Regula, Jaroslaw ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Poland)

^b MEDICAL CENTER FOR POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDANSK   (Poland)

Author keywords

Colon Cancer; Early Detection; Efficacy; Tumor

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; ENDOSCOPIST; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; SCREENING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; ADENOCARCINOMA; BENCHMARKING; COLORECTAL TUMOR; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MORTALITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STANDARDS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOMA; BENCHMARKING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 85020910092     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: 15280012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pox, C., Schmiegel, W., Classen, M., Current status of screening colonoscopy in Europe and in the United States. Endoscopy 39 (2007), 168–173.
2. van Rijn, J.C., Reitsma, J.B., Stoker, J., et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006), 343–350.
3. Kaminski, M.F., Regula, J., Kraszewska, E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362 (2010), 1795–1803.
4. Corley, D.A., Jensen, C.D., Marks, A.R., et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370 (2014), 1298–1306.
5. Kaminski, M.F., Kraszewska, E., Polkowski, M., et al. Continuous quality improvement of screening colonoscopy: data from a large colorectal cancer screening program. Gastrointest Endosc, 69, 2009, AB215.
6. Kaminski, M.F., Anderson, J., Valori, R., et al. Leadership training to improve adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy: a randomised trial. Gut 65 (2016), 616–624.
7. Coe, S.G., Crook, J.E., Diehl, N.N., et al. An endoscopic quality improvement program improves detection of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 108 (2013), 219–226 quiz 227.
8. Brenner, H., Altenhofen, L., Kretschmann, J., et al. Trends in adenoma detection rates during the first 10 years of the German screening colonoscopy program. Gastroenterology 149 (2015), 356–366 e1.
9. Kaminski, M.F., Kraszewska, E., Rupinski, M., et al. Design of the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program: a randomized health services study. Endoscopy 47 (2015), 1144–1150.
10. Regula, J., Rupinski, M., Kraszewska, E., et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 355 (2006), 1863–1872.
11. Wojciechowska, U., Didkowska, J., Zatonski, W., Cancer in Poland in 2011. 2013, National Cancer Registry of Poland, the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw.
12. Sanduleanu, S., le Clercq, C.M., Dekker, E., et al. Definition and taxonomy of interval colorectal cancers: a proposal for standardising nomenclature. Gut 64 (2015), 1257–1267.
13. Winawer, S.J., Zauber, A.G., Fletcher, R.H., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56 (2006), 143–159.
14. Hougaard, P., Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Anal 1 (1995), 255–273.
15. Rex, D.K., Schoenfeld, P.S., Cohen, J., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 110 (2015), 72–90.
16. Valori, R., Rey, J.F., Atkin, W.S., et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition–quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy 44:Suppl 3 (2012), SE88–SE105.
17. Corley, D.A., Jensen, C.D., Marks, A.R., Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 74 (2011), 656–665.
18. Kaminski, M.F., Regula, J., Adenoma detection race at colonoscopy: the good and the bad. Gastroenterology 149 (2015), 273–274.
19. Meester, R.G., Doubeni, C.A., Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I., et al. Variation in adenoma detection rate and the lifetime benefits and cost of colorectal cancer screening: a microsimulation model. JAMA 313 (2015), 2349–2358.
20. Hassan, C., Rex, D.K., Zullo, A., et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy according to the adenoma detection rate. United European Gastroenterol J 3 (2015), 200–207.
21. Dunckley, P., Elta, G., Quality assurance of training. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25 (2011), 397–407.
22. Barclay, R.L., Vicari, J.J., Doughty, A.S., Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006), 2533–2541.
23. Shaukat, A., Rector, T.S., Church, T.R., et al. Longer withdrawal time is associated with a reduced incidence of interval cancer after screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 149 (2015), 952–957.