Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications

PeerJ Computer Science

Volumn 2016, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Kuhn, Tobias ^a   Chichester, Christine ^b   Krauthammer, Michael ^c,d   Queralt Rosinach, Núria ^e   Verborgh, Ruben ^f   Giannakopoulos, George ^g,h   Ngomo, Axel Cyrille Ngonga ⁱ   Viglianti, Raffaele ^j   Dumontier, Michel ^k  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^g INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (Greece)

^h SciFY Private Not for profit Company   (Greece)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^j Maryland Inst Technol in the Hum   (United States)

^k STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Data publishing; Linked data; Nanopublications; Provenance; Semantic Web

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS; LINKED DATA;

BOTTOM-UP PROCESS; DATA PUBLICATIONS; DATA PUBLISHING; NANOPUBLICATIONS; PROVENANCE; SCIENTIFIC DATA; SCIENTIFIC RESULTS; TOP-DOWN CONTROL;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 85020736599     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23765992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.78     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Banda JM, Kuhn T, Shah NH, Dumontier M. 2015. Provenance-centered dataset of drug-drug interactions. In: Proceedings of the 14th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2015). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 293-300.
2. Belhajjame K, Corcho O, Garijo D, Zhao J, Missier P, Newman D, Palma R, Bechhofer S, Garcia Cuesta E, Gómez-Pérez JM, Kyle G, Page K, Roos M, Ruiz JE, Soiland-Reyes S, Verdes-Montenegro L, De Roure D, Goble CA. 2012. Workflow-centric research objects: first class citizens in scholarly discourse. In: Proceedings of SePublica 2012. CEUR-WS.
3. Berners-Lee T. 2006. Linked data-design issues. Available at http:// www.w3.org/ DesignIssues/ LinkedData.html.
4. Bradley J. 2005. Documents and data: modelling materials for humanities research in XML and relational databases. Literary and Linguistic Computing 20(1):133-151 DOI 10.1093/llc/fqh048.
5. Buil-Aranda C, Hogan A, Umbrich J, Vandenbussche PY. 2013. SPARQL webquerying infrastructure: ready for action? In: The Semantic Web-ISWC 2013. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 277-293.
6. Carroll J, Bizer C, Hayes P, Stickler P. 2005. Named graphs, provenance and trust. In: Proceedings of WWW'05. New York: ACM, 613-622.
7. Chichester C, Gaudet P, Karch O, Groth P, Lane L, Bairoch A, Mons B, Loizou A. 2014. Querying neXtProt nanopublications and their value for insights on sequence variants and tissue expression. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 29:3-11.
8. Chichester C, Karch O, Gaudet P, Lane L, Mons B, Bairoch A. 2015. Converting neXtProt into linked data and nanopublications. Semantic Web 6(2):147-153.
9. Clarke I, Sandberg O, Wiley B, Hong TW. 2001. Freenet: a distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system. In: Designing Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 46-66.
10. Cohen JP, Lo HZ. 2014. Academic torrents: a community-maintained distributed repository. In: Proceedings of XSEDE '14. New York: ACM, 2.
11. Feigenbaum L, Williams GT, Clark KG, Torres E. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Protocol recommendation W3C. Available at http:// www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/ .
12. Filali I, Bongiovanni F, Huet F, Baude F. 2011. A survey of structured P2P systems for RDF data storage and retrieval. In: Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledgecentered systems III. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 20-55.
13. Freedman R. 2014. The Renaissance chanson goes digital: digitalduchemin. org. Early Music 42(4):567-578 DOI 10.1093/em/cau108.
14. Fu K, Kaashoek MF, Mazières D. 2002. Fast and secure distributed read-only file system. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 20(1):1-24 DOI 10.1145/505452.505453.
15. Golden P, Shaw R. 2016. Nanopublication beyond the sciences: the PeriodO period gazetteer. PeerJ Computer Science 2:e44 DOI 10.7717/peerj-cs.44.
16. Gray AJ, Baran J, Marshall MS, Dumontier M. 2015. Dataset descriptions: HCLS community profile. Interest group note, W3C (May 2015). Available at http://www. w3.org/TR/hcls-dataset .
17. Groth P, Gibson A, Velterop J. 2010. The anatomy of a nano-publication. Information Services and Use 30(1):51-56.
18. Han L, Finin T, Parr C, Sachs J, Joshi A. 2008. RDF123: from Spreadsheets to RDF. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the semantic web. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 451-466.
19. Harris S, Seaborne A. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 query language Recommendation W3C. Available at http:// www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ .
20. Hartig O. 2013. An overview on execution strategies for linked data queries. Datenbank-Spektrum 13(2):89-99 DOI 10.1007/s13222-013-0122-1.
21. Jacobson V, Smetters DK, Thornton JD, Plass M, Briggs N, Braynard R. 2012. Networking Named Content. Communications of the ACM 55(1):117-124.
22. Kuhn T. 2014. A Survey and Classification of Controlled Natural Languages. Computational Linguistics 40(1):121-170 DOI 10.1162/COLI_a_00168.
23. Kuhn T. 2015a. nanopub-java: a Java library for nanopublications. In: Proceedings of the 5th workshop on linked science (LISC 2015).
24. Kuhn T. 2015b. Science bots: a model for the future of scientific computation? In: WWW 2015 companion proceedings. New York: ACM, 1061-1062.
25. Kuhn T, Barbano PE, Nagy ML, Krauthammer M. 2013. Broadening the scope of nanopublications. In: Proceedings of ESWC 2013. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 487-501.
26. Kuhn T, Chichester C, Krauthammer M, Dumontier M. 2015. Publishing without publishers: a decentralized approach to dissemination, retrieval, and archiving of data. In: Proceedings of the 14th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2015), Lecture notes in computer science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
27. Kuhn T, Dumontier M. 2014. Trusty URIs: verifiable, immutable, and permanent digital artifacts for linked data. In: Proceedings of ESWC 2014. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 395-410.
28. Kuhn T, Dumontier M. 2015. Making digital artifacts on the web verifiable and reliable. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27(9):2390-2400.
29. Kuhn T, Royer L, Fuchs NE, Schroeder M. 2006. Improving text mining with controlled natural language: a case study for protein interations. In: Proceedings DILS'06. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
30. Ladwig G, Harth A. 2011. CumulusRDF: linked data management on nested key-value stores. In: Proceedings of SSWS 2011.
31. Markman C, Zavras C. 2014. BitTorrent and libraries: cooperative data publishing, management and discovery. D-Lib Magazine 20(3) DOI 10.1045/march2014-markman.
32. McCusker JP, Lebo T, Krauthammer M, McGuinness DL. 2013. Next generation cancer data discovery, access, and integration using prizms and nanopublications. In: Proceedings of DILS 2013. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 105-112.
33. Miller A, Juels A, Shi E, Parno B, Katz J. 2014. Permacoin: repurposing Bitcoin work for data preservation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP). Piscataway: IEEE, 475-490.
34. Mons B, Van Haagen H, Chichester C, Den Dunnen JT, Van Ommen G, Van Mulligen E, Singh B, Hooft R, Roos M, Hammond J, Kiesel B, Giardine B, Velterop J, Groth P, Schultes E. 2011. The value of data. Nature Genetics 43(4):281-283 DOI 10.1038/ng0411-281.
35. NP Index RA7SuQ0e66. 2015. Linked drug-drug interactions (LIDDI). Nanopublication index. Available at http://np.inn.ac/RA7SuQ0e661LJdKpt5EOS2DKykf1ht9LFmN aZtFSDMrXg.
36. NP Index RACy0I4f_w. 2015. Nanopubs converted from OpenBEL's Small and Large Corpus 1.0. Nanopublication index. Available at http:// np.inn.ac/ RACy0I4f_ wr62Ol7BhnD5EkJU6Glf-wp0oPbDbyve7P6o.
37. NP Index RAR5dwELYL. 2015. Nanopubs converted from OpenBEL's Small and Large Corpus 20131211. Nanopublication index. Available at http:// np.inn.ac/ RAR5dwELYLKGSfrOclnWhjOj-2nGZN_8BW1JjxwFZINHw.
38. NP Index RAVEKRW0m6. 2015. Nanopubs extracted from DisGeNET v3.0.0.0.
39. Nanopublication index. Available at http:// np.inn.ac/RAVEKRW0m6Ly_ PjmhcxCZMR5fYIlzzqjOWt1CgcwD_77c.
40. NP Index RAXFlG04YM. 2015. Nanopubs converted from neXtProt protein data (preliminary).
41. Nanopublication index. Available at http://np.inn.ac/RAXFlG04YMi1A5su7o F6emA8mSp6HwyS3mFTVYreDeZRg.
42. NP Index RAXy332hxq. 2015. Nanopubs extracted from DisGeNET v2.1.0.0. Nanopublication index. Available at http://np.inn.ac/RAXy332hxqHPKpmvPc-wqJA7kgWiWa-QA0DIpr29LIG0Q.
43. NP Index RAY_lQruua. 2015. AIDA Nanopubs extracted from GeneRIF. Nanopublication index. Available at http://np.inn.ac/RAY_lQruuagCYtAcKAPptkY7EpITwZeUil GHsWGm9ZWNI.
44. Paskin N. 2005. Digital object identifiers for scientific data. Data Science Journal 4:12-20 DOI 10.2481/dsj.4.12.
45. Patrinos GP, Cooper DN, Van Mulligen E, Gkantouna V, Tzimas G, Tatum Z, Schultes E, Roos M, Mons B. 2012. Microattribution and nanopublication as means to incentivize the placement of human genome variation data into the public domain. Human Mutation 33(11):1503-1512 DOI 10.1002/humu.22144.
46. Proell S, Rauber A. 2014. A scalable framework for dynamic data citation of arbitrary structured data. In: 3rd international conference on data management technologies and applications (DATA2014).
47. Queralt-Rosinach N, Kuhn T, Chichester C, Dumontier M, Sanz F, Furlong LI. 2016. Publishing DisGeNET as nanopublications. Semantic Web-Interoperability, Usability, Applicability 7(5):519-528.
48. Sequeda JF, Arenas M, Miranker DP. 2012. On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 649-658.
49. Speicher S, Arwe J, Malhotra A. 2015. Linked data platform 1.0. Recommendation W3C. Available at https:// www.w3.org/TR/ldp/ .
50. Verborgh R, Hartig O, De Meester B, Haesendonck G, De Vocht L, Vander Sande M, Cyganiak R, Colpaert P, Mannens E, Van de Walle R. 2014. Querying datasets on the web with high availability. In: Mika P, Tudorache T, Bernstein A, Welty C, Knoblock C, Vrandečić D, Groth P, Noy N, Janowicz K, Goble C, eds. Proceedings of the 13th international semantic web conference. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 8796. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 180-196.
51. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, Da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J, Brookes AJ, Clark T, Crosas M, Dillo I, Dumon O, Edmunds S, Evelo CT, Finkers R, Gonzalez-Beltran A, Gray AJ, Groth P, Goble C, Grethe JS, Heringa J, 't Hoen PA, Hooft R, Kuhn T, Kok R, Kok J, Lusher SJ, Martone ME, Mons A, Packer AL, Persson B, Rocca-Serra P, Roos M, Van Schaik R, Sansone SA, Schultes E, Sengstag T, Slater T, Strawn G, Swertz MA, Thompson M, Van der Lei J, Van Mulligen E, Velterop J, Waagmeester A, Wittenburg P, Wolstencroft K, Zhao J, Monsa B. 2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3:160018 DOI 10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
52. Williams AJ, Harland L, Groth P, Pettifer S, Chichester C, Willighagen EL, Evelo CT, Blomberg N, Ecker G, Goble C, Mons B. 2012. Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today 17(21):1188-1198 DOI 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.05.016.