Querying datasets on the web with high availability

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8796, Issue , 2014, Pages 180-196

  Verborgh, Ruben ^a   Hartig, Olaf ^b   De Meester, Ben ^a   Haesendonck, Gerald ^a   De Vocht, Laurens ^a   Sande, Miel Vander ^a   Cyganiak, Richard ^c   Colpaert, Pieter ^a   Mannens, Erik ^a   Van de Walle, Rik ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Availability; Linked Data; Linked Data Fragments; Querying; Scalability; Sparql

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908679491     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11964-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Amundsen, M.: Hypermedia types. In: rest: From Research to Practice, pp. 93-116. Springer (2011).
2. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1-22 (2009).
3. Bizer, C., Schultz, A.: The Berlin sparql benchmark. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(2), 1-24 (2009).
4. Buil-Aranda, C., Hogan, A.: sparql Web-querying infrastructure: Ready for action? In: Proceedings of the 12th International Semantic Web Conference (November 2013).
5. Erling, O., Mikhailov, I.: Virtuoso: rdf support in a native rdbms. In: Semantic Web Information Management, pp. 501-519. Springer (2010).
6. Feigenbaum, L., Williams, G. T., Clark, K. G., Torres, E.: sparql 1. 1 protocol Recommendation, w3c (March 2013), http://www. w3. org/TR/sparql11-protocol/.
7. Fernández, J. D., Martínez-Prieto, M. A., Gutirrez, C., Polleres, A., Arias, M.: Binary rdf representation for publication and exchange (hdt). Journal of Web Semantics 19, 22-41 (2013).
8. Fielding, R. T.: Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Ph. D. thesis, University of California (2000).
9. Fielding, R. T.: rest apis must be hypertext-driven (October 2008), http://roy. gbiv. com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven.
10. Graefe, G.: Query evaluation techniques for large databases. acm Computing Surveys 25(2), 73-169 (June 1993).
11. Grobe, M.: rdf, Jena, sparql and the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual acm siguccs Fall Conference: Communication and Collaboration (2009), doi: 10. 1145/1629501. 1629525.
12. Harris, S., Seaborne, A.: sparql 1. 1 query language. Recommendation, w3c (March 2013), http://www. w3. org/TR/sparql11-query/.
13. Hartig, O.: Zero-knowledge query planning for an iterator implementation of link traversal based query execution. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 154-169. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).
14. Hartig, O.: An overview on execution strategies for Linked Data queries. Datenbank-Spektrum 13(2), 89-99 (2013).
15. Hartig, O., Bizer, C., Freytag, J.-C.: Executing SPARQL Queries over the Web of Linked Data. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D. R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 293-309. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
16. Klyne, G., Carrol, J. J.: Resource Description Framework (rdf): Concepts and abstract syntax. Rec., w3c (February 2004), http://www. w3. org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
17. Linked Data api, https://code. google. com/p/linked-data-api/.
18. Matteis, L.: Restpark: Minimal restful api for retrieving rdf triples (2013), http://lmatteis. github. io/restpark/restpark. pdf.
19. Morsey, M., Lehmann, J.: dbpedia sparql benchmark performance assessment with real queries on real data. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference (2011).
20. Ogbuji, C.: sparql 1. 1 Graph Store http Protocol. Recommendation, w3c (March 2013), http://www. w3. org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/.
21. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of sparql. acm Transactions on Database Systems 34(3), 16: 1-16: 45 (2009).
22. Schmidt, M., Hornung, T., Meier, M., Pinkel, C., Lausen, G.: SP2Bench: A sparql performance benchmark. In: Semantic Web Information Management (2010).
23. Speicher, S., Arwe, J., Malhotra, A.: Linked Data Platform 1. 0. Candidate recommendation, w3c (June 2014), http://www. w3. org/TR/2014/CR-ldp-20140619/.
24. Sporny, M., Longley, D., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., Lindström, N.: jsonld 1. 0. Recommendation, w3c (January 2014), http://www. w3. org/TR/json-ld/.
25. Verborgh, R.: Linked Data Fragments. Unofficial draft, Hydra wthreec Community Group, http://www. hydra-cg. com/spec/latest/linked-data-fragments/.
26. Verborgh, R.: Triple Pattern Fragments. Unofficial draft, Hydra w3c Community Group, http://www. hydra-cg. com/spec/latest/triple-pattern-fragments/.
27. Verborgh, R., Vander Sande, M., Colpaert, P., Coppens, S., Mannens, E., Van de Walle, R.: Web-scale querying through Linked Data Fragments. In: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Linked Data on the Web (2014).
28. Wilde, E., Hausenblas, M.: restful sparql? You name it!-Aligning sparql with rest and resource orientation. In: Proceedings of the 4 Workshop on Emerging Web Services Technology, pp. 39-43. ACM (2009).