Nanopublication beyond the sciences: The PeriodO period gazetteer

PeerJ Computer Science

Volumn 2016, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Golden, Patrick ^a   Shaw, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

JSON LD; Linked data; Nanopublication; Periodization; Scholarly communication; Time

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS; LINKED DATA;

JSON-LD; NANOPUBLICATION; PERIODIZATION; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; TIME;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 84966559065     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23765992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.44     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Belarte MC. 2008. Domestic architecture and social differences in north-eastern Iberia during the Iron Age (c.525-200 BC). Oxford Journal of Archaeology 27:175-199 DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2008.00303.x.
2. Bradley J, Short H. 2005. Texts into databases: the evolving field of new-style prosopography. Literary and Linguistic Computing 20(Suppl. no. 1):3-24 DOI 10.1093/llc/fqi022.
3. Buckland M. 2006. Description and search: metadata as infrastructure. Brazilian Journal of Information Science 0(0):3-14. Available at http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/ bjis/article/viewArticle/26.
4. Carothers G, Prud'hommeaux E. 2014. RDF 1.1 Turtle. W3C recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-turtle-20140225/.
5. Eisenstein E. 1979. The printing press as an agent of change: communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Elliott T, Gillies S. 2011. Pleiades: an un-GIS for Ancient Geography. In: Digital humanities conference 2011. Stanford. Available at http://dh2011abstracts.stanford.edu/xtf/view?docId=tei/ ab-192.xml.
7. Gillies S. 2015. Event-like GeoJSON Features Using JSON-LD. Available at https://github.com/ geojson/geojson-ld/blob/8f08cf2df2e61de3a666ed90be43a14eada4cc03/time.md.
8. Gradmann S. 2014. From containers to content to context. Journal of Documentation 70(2):241-260 DOI 10.1108/JD-05-2013-0058.
9. Groth P, Gibson A, Velterop J. 2010. The anatomy of a nanopublication. Information Services & Use 30(1-2):51-56 DOI 10.3233/ISU-2010-0613.
10. Groth P, Schultes E, Thompson M, Tatum Z, Dumontier M. 2013. Nanopublication Guidelines. In: Concept web alliance working draft, concept web alliance. Available at http://www.nanopub. org/2013/WD-guidelines-20131215/.
11. Heath T, Bizer C. 2011. Linked data: evolving the web into a global data space. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology 1(1):1-136 DOI 10.2200/S00334ED1V01Y201102WBE001.
12. Hobbs J, Pan F. 2006. Time ontology in OWL.W3C working draft, W3C. Available at http://www. w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-time-20060927/.
13. Isaksen L, Simon R, Barker ET, De Soto Cañamares P. 2014. Pelagios and the emerging graph of ancient world data. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science-WebSci '14. New York: ACM Press, 197-201.
14. Kauppinen T,Mantegari G, Paakkarinen P, Kuittinen H, Hyvönen E, Bandini S. 2010. Determining relevance of imprecise temporal intervals for cultural heritage information retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(9):549-560 DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.03.002.
15. Kuhn T. 2015. Science bots: a model for the future of scientific computation? In: WWW 2015 companion proceedings. New York: ACM.
16. Kuhn T, Barbano PE, Nagy ML, Krauthammer M. 2013. Broadening the scope of nanopublications. In: The semantic web: semantics and big data. Vol. 7882. Heidelberg: Springer, 487-501.
17. McGuinness D, Lebo T, Sahoo S. 2013. PROV-O: the PROV ontology. W3C recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-prov-o-20130430/.
18. Mink LO. 1966. The autonomy of historical understanding. History and Theory 5(1):24-47 DOI 10.2307/2504434.
19. Mons B, Van Haagen H, Chichester C, Hoen P-BT, Den Dunnen JT, Van Ommen G, Van Mulligen E, Singh B, Hooft R, Roos M, Hammond J, Kiesel B, Giardine B, Velterop J, Groth P, Schultes E. 2011. The value of data. Nature Genetics 43(4):281-283 DOI 10.1038/ng0411-281.
20. Mons B, Velterop J. 2009. Nano-publication in the e-science era. In: Clark T, Luciano JS, Marshall MS, Prud'hommeaux E, Stephens S, eds. Proceedings of the workshop on semantic web applications in scientific discourse (SWASD 2009), CEUR workshop proceedings. Washington, D.C. Available at http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523/Mons.pdf.
21. Nelson TH. 1999. Xanalogical structure, needed now more than ever: parallel documents, deep links to content, deep versioning, and deep re-use. ACM Computing Surveys 31(4es):33-es DOI 10.1145/345966.346033.
22. Nottingham M, Bryan P. 2013. Java script object notation (JSON) patch. In: IETF proposed standard, internet engineering task force (IETF). Available at https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6902.
23. Rabinowitz A. 2014. It's about time: historical periodization and linked ancient world data. ISAW Papers 7:22. Available at http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/7/rabinowitz/.
24. Shaw R, Rabinowitz A, Golden P, Kansa E. 2015. A sharing-oriented design strategy for networked knowledge organization systems. International Journal on Digital Libraries Epub ahead of print Aug 14 2015 DOI 10.1007/s00799-015-0164-0.
25. Sporny M, Kellogg G, Lanthaler M. 2014. JSON-LD 1.0. W3C recommendation, W3C. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/.
26. Starr J,Willett P, Federer L, Horning C, BergstromM. 2012. A collaborative framework for data management services: the experience of the university of California. Journal of eScience Librarianship 1(2):109-114 DOI 10.7191/jeslib.2012.1014.