Can facebook aid sustainability? An investigation of empathy expression within the Humans of New York blog

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2017, Pages

  Wheeler, Hannah ^a   Quinn, Courtney ^a  

^a FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empathy; Facebook; Humans of New York; Intergroup contact theory; Pro environmental behavior; Social foundations; Social media; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

HUMAN BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL POLICY; SUSTAINABILITY;

NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85020719142     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su9061005     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. Available online: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ 2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20%28July%201%29.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2015).
2. UN Adopts New Global Goals, Charting Sustainable Development for People and Planet by 2030. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/sustainable/un-adopts-new-global-goals.html (accessed on 25 September 2015).
3. Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin, F.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton, T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472-475.
4. Raworth, K. A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live within the Doughnut? Oxfam Discussion Paper; Oxfam: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 1-26.
5. Showstack, R. Obama calls for more action on climate change during State of the Union address. EOS 2013, 94, 78-79.
6. Ones, D.S.; Dilchert, S. Environmental sustainability at work: A call to action. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2012, 5, 444-466.
7. Bendell, J.; Little, R. Seeking sustainability leadership. J. Corp. Citizensh. 2015, 60, 13-26.
8. Pfattheicher, S.; Sassenrath, C.; Schindler, S. Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environ. Behav. 2016, 48, 929-945.
9. Batson, C.D.; Turk, C.L.; Shaw, L.L.; Klein, T.R. Information function of empathic emotion: Learning that we value the other's welfare. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 68, 300-313.
10. Prot, S.; Anderson, C.A. Research Methods, Design, and Statistics in Media Psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology; Dill, K., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 109-136.
11. Alvídrez, S.; Piñeiro-Naval, V.; Marcos-Ramos, M.; Rojas-Solís, J.L. Intergroup contact in computer-mediated communication: The interplay of a stereotype-disconfirming behavior and a lasting group identity on reducing prejudiced perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 52, 533-540.
12. Davis, M.H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1983, 44, 113-126.
13. Batson, C.D.; Polycarpou, M.P.; Harmon-Jones, E.; Imhoff, H.J.; Mitchener, E.C.; Bednar, L.L.; Klein, T.R.; Highberger, L. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 72, 105-118.
14. Monroe, K.R. A fat lady in a corset: Altruism and social theory. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 1994, 38, 861-893.
15. Kollmuss, A.; Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8, 239-260.
16. Pettigrew, T.F. Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1998, 49, 65-85.
17. Batson, C.D.; Chang, J.; Orr, R.; Rowland, J. Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 2002, 28, 1656-1666.
18. Decety, J. The neuroevolution of empathy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1231, 35-45.
19. Berenguer, J. The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Environ. Behav. 2007, 39, 269-283.
20. Markowitz, E.M.; Goldberg, L.R.; Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K. Profiling the "pro-environmental individual": A personality perspective. J. Pers. 2012, 80, 81-111.
21. Pahl, S.; Bauer, J. Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environ. Behav. 2013, 45, 155-169.
22. Schultz, P.W. Empathizing with nature: Toward a social-cognitive theory of environmental concern. J. Soc. Issues 2000, 56, 391-406.
23. Ericson, T.; Kjønstad, B.G.; Barstad, A. Mindfulness and sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 104, 73-79.
24. Allport, G.W. The Nature of Prejudice, 3rd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1979.
25. Pettigrew, T.F.; Tropp, L.R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 90, 751-783.
26. Turner, R.N.; Crisp, R.J.; Lambert, E. Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2007, 10, 427-441.
27. Pettigrew, T.F.; Tropp, L.R.; Wagner, U.; Christ, O. Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. Int. J. Intercult. Rel. 2011, 35, 271-280.
28. Hewstone, M.; Brown, R. Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "contact hypothesis". In Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters; Hewstone, M., Brown, R., Eds.; Basil Blackwell: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1986; pp. 1-44.
29. Crisp, R.J.; Turner, R.N. Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64, 231-240.
30. 30. Crisp, R.J.; Turner, R.N. The Imagined Contact Hypothesis. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology; Olson, J., Zanna, M.P., Eds.; Academic Press: Orlando, FL, USA, 2012; Volume 46, pp. 125-182.
31. Abrams, D.; Crisp, R.J.; Marques, S.; Fagg, E.; Bedford, L.; Provias, D. Threat inoculation: Experienced and imagined intergenerational contact prevents stereotype threat effects on older people's math performance. Psychol. Aging 2008, 23, 934.
32. Husnu, S.; Crisp, R.J. Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46, 943-950.
33. Husnu, S.; Crisp, R.J. Imagined intergroup contact: A new technique for encouraging greater inter-ethnic contact in Cyprus. Peace Confl. 2010, 16, 97-108.
34. Turner, R.N.; Crisp, R.J. Imagining intergroup contact reduces implicit prejudice. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 49, 129-142.
35. Turner, R.N.;West, K. Behavioural consequences of imagining intergroup contact with stigmatized outgroups. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2012, 15, 193-202.
36. Harwood, J.; Paolini, S.; Joyce, N.; Rubin, M.; Arroyo, A. Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 50, 180-189.
37. West, K.; Holmes, E.; Hewstone, M. Enhancing imagined contact to reduce prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 2011, 14, 407-428.
38. Cameron, L.; Rutland, A.; Brown, R. Promoting children's positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 2007, 31, 454-466.
39. Castelli, L.; De Dea, C.; Nesdale, D. Learning social attitudes: Children's sensitivity to the nonverbal behaviors of adult models during interracial interactions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 2008, 34, 1504-1513.
40. Schiappa, E.; Gregg, P.B.; Hewes, D.E. Can one TV show make a difference? A Will & Grace and the parasocial contact hypothesis. J. Homosex. 2006, 51, 15-37.
41. Schiappa, E.; Gregg, P.B.; Hewes, D.E. The parasocial contact hypothesis. Commun. Monogr. 2005, 72, 92-115.
42. Konrath, S.H.; O'Brien, E.H.; Hsing, C. Changes in dispositional empathy in American college students over time: A meta-analysis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2011, 15, 180-198.
43. Twenge, J.M.; Campbell,W.K.; Freeman, E.C. Generational differences in young adults' life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 102, 1045-1062.
44. Turkle, S. Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age; Penguin Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
45. Amichai-Hamburger, Y.; Furnham, A. The positive net. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23, 1033-1045.
46. Hoter, E.; Shonfeld, M.; Ganayim, A. Information and communication technology (ICT) in the service of multiculturalism. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2009, 10, 1-15.
47. Walther, J.B. Computer-mediated communication and virtual groups: Applications to interethnic conflict. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 2009, 37, 225-238.
48. Schwab, A.K.; Greitemeyer, T. Failing to Establish Evaluative Conditioning Effects for Indirect Intergroup Contact on Facebook. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 37, 87-104.
49. Wilhelm, A.G. Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
50. Caplan, S.E.; Turner, J.S. Bringing theory to research on computer-mediated comforting communication. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23, 985-998.
51. White, F.A.; Harvey, L.J.; Abu-Rayya, H.M. Improving intergroup relations in the Internet age: A critical review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2015, 19, 129-139.
52. Schumann, S.; van der Linden, N.; Klein, O. Bridging the gap on Facebook: Assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2012, 15, 411-416.
53. Prot, S.; Gentile, D.A.; Anderson, C.A.; Suzuki, K.; Swing, E.; Lim, K.M.; Horiuchi, Y.; Jelic, M.; Krahé, B.; Liuqing, W.; et al. Long-term relations among prosocial-media use, empathy, and prosocial behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2014, 25, 358-368.
54. Creswell, J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012.
55. Yin, R. How to Do Better Case Studies. In The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 2nd ed.; Bickman, L., Rog, D.J., Eds.; SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 254-282.
56. Davis, M.H. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Cat. Sel. Doc. Psychol. 1980, 10, 85-104.
57. Hruschka, D.J.; Schwartz, D.; St. John, D.C.; Picone-Decaro, E.; Jenkins, R.A.; Carey, J.W. Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods 2004, 16, 307-331.
58. Stemler, S. An overview of content analysis. PARE 2001, 7, 137-146.
59. Let's Send Kids to Harvard: Vidal Scholarship Fund. Generosity. Available online: https://www. generosity.com/community-fundraising/let-s-send-kids-to-harvard-vidal-scholarship-fund (accessed on 12 January 2016).
60. Small, D.A.; Loewenstein, G. Helping a victim or helping the victim: Altruism and identifiability. J. Risk Uncertain. 2003, 26, 5-16.