Erratum: Retraction of bridging the gap on facebook: Assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations (Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking (2012) 15:8 (411-416) DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0569);Bridging the gap on facebook: Assessing intergroup contact and its effects for intergroup relations

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 411-416

  Schumann, Sandy ^a   Van Der Linden, Nicolas ^a   Klein, Olivier ^a  

^a FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865226767     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0569.ret     Document Type: Erratum

References (32)

1. Wilhelm AG. (2000) Democracy in the digital age: challenges to political life in cyberspace. New York: Rootledge.
2. Negroponte N. (1996) Being digital. London: Vintage.
3. Tajfel H, Turner JC. (1986) The social identity theory of in-tergroup behaviour. In Worchel S, Austin WG, eds. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, pp. 7-24.
4. Allport G. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Bar-On D. (2000) Bridging the Gap. Hamburg: Koerber.
6. Dovidio J, Eller A, Hewstone M. Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact. British Journal of Social Psychology 2011; 2:147-160.
7. Pettigrew T, Tropp L. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006; 5:751-783.
8. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, et al. (1987) Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Butler J. (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
10. Smith ER, Mackie DM. (2007) Social psychology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
11. Aimichai-Hamburger Y, McKenna KYA. The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006; 3: Available from: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/amichai-ham-burger.html
12. Stephan WG, Stephan CW. (2000) An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In: Oskamp S, ed. Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 23-45.
13. Mazziotta A, Mummendey A, Wright S C. Vicarious inter-group contact effects: applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes and Inter-group Relations 2011; 2:255-274.
14. Stock O, Zancanaro M, Rocchi C, et al. The design of a collaborative interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict. AI and Society 2009; 1:51-59.
15. Kampf R, Cuhadar E. Learning on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Through Interactive Media: The case of Peacemaker. IACM, 2011, July 3-6. Istanbul, Turkey.
16. Yablon YB, Katz YJ. Internet-based group relationships: a high school peace education project in Israel. Educational Media International 2001; 2-3:175-182.
17. Yablon YB. Feeling close from a distance: peace encounters via Internet technology. New Directions for Youth Development 2007; 116:99-107.
18. Tynes BM, Giang MT, Thompson GN. Ethnic identity, in-tergroup contact, and outgroup orientation among diverse groups of adolescents on the Internet. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2008; 4:459-465.
19. mashable.com [Internet]. New York City, USA: Mashable; c2005-2012 [cited May 3, 2012]. Available from: http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/facebook-now-has- 901-million-users/.
20. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 1:article 11. Retrieved March 13, 2012 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison. html
21. Viswanath B, Mislove A, Cha M, Gummadi KP. On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. WOSN'09, August 17, 2009, Barcelona, Spain. Copyright 2009 ACM. pp. 37-42.
22. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The bene?ts of Facebook ''friends:'' social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1143-1168.
23. Kraut RE, Resnick P. (2011) Evidence-based social design: mining the social sciences to build online communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Buckingham D. (2008) Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
25. Kushin MJ, Kitchener K. Getting political on social network sites: exploring online political discourse on Face-book. First Monday 2009; 14: Available from: http://first monday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/view/2645/0
26. Samson K, Nowak A. Linguistic signs of destructive and constructive processes in conflict. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Association of Conflict Management Conference, 2010 June 24-27. Boston, Massachusetts.
27. Kampf R. Internet, conflict and dialogue: the Israeli case. Israel Affairs 2011; 3:384-400.
28. Maoz I. Does contact work in protracted asymmetrical conflict? Appraising 20 years of reconciliation-aimed encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. Journal of Peace Research 2011; 48:115-125.
29. AnsonAlex.com [Internet] N.A.: AnsonAlex; c2011-2012 [cited May 3, 2012] Available from: http://ansonalex.com/infographics/facebook-user-statistics-2012- infographic
30. Durham MG. Girls, Media, and the Negotiation of Sexuality: a study of race, class, and gender in adolescent peer groups. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1999; 76: 192-203.
31. Steele JR, Brown JD. Adolescent room culture: studying media in the context of everyday life. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1995; 24:551.
32. Hoter E, Shonfeld M, Ganayem A. Information and communication technology (ICT) in the service of multicultur-alism. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 2000; 2:1-15.