New clinical performance measures for contraceptive care: their importance to healthcare quality

Contraception

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 149-157

  Gavin, Loretta ^a   Frederiksen, Brittni ^a   Robbins, Cheryl ^b   Pazol, Karen ^b   Moskosky, Susan ^a  

^a Office of Population Affairs   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraceptive care; Healthcare quality; National Quality Forum; Office of Population Affairs; Performance measures

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PREGNANCY RISK ASSESSMENT MONITORING SYSTEM; RACE DIFFERENCE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; WOMEN'S HEALTH; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 85020629620     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. 2001, National Academies of Science, Washington, DC.
2. Berwick, D., Nolan, T., Whittington, J., The triple aim: care, health and cost. Health Aff 27:3 (2008), 759–769.
3. AHRQ, Services UHaH, (eds.) National strategy for quality improvement in health care, 2011 [Rockville MD].
4. Jackson, A.V., Karasek, D., Dehlendorf, C., Foster, D.G., Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods. Contraception 93:5 (2016), 406–411.
5. Stanwood, N.L., Bradley, K.A., Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 108:6 (2006), 1417–1422.
6. Grady, W.R., Klepinger, D.H., Nelson-Wally, A., Contraceptive characteristics: the perceptions and priorities of men and women. Fam Plann Perspect 31:4 (1999), 168–175.
7. Forrest, J.D., U.S. women's perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD. Obstet Gynecol Surv 51:12 Suppl. (1996), S30–S34.
8. Parks, C., Peipert, J.F., Eliminating health disparities in unintended pregnancy with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Am J Obstet Gynecol 214:6 (2016), 681–688.
9. ACOG, Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 6th ed., 2007, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR 65:3 (2016), 1–104 [No. RR-4].
11. ACOG, Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Practice bulletin, 2015, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, 1–13 [reaffirmed].
12. National Quality Forum, Measure evaluation criteria and guidance for evaluating measures for endorsement. 2015, The National Quality Forum, Washington, DC.
13. National Quality Forum, Perinatal and reproductive health 2015–2016 final report. 2016, 1–223 [Washington, DC].
14. National Quality Forum, Measure evaluation criteria and guidance for evaluating measures for endorsement. 2013, National Quality Forum, Washington, DC.
15. National Center for Health Statistics, The National Survey of Family Growth, 2013-2015, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD.
16. Division of Reproductive Health, The pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 2012-2013, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
17. Trussell, J., Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 83:5 (2011), 397–404.
18. Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services, Maternal and infant health care quality. https://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Quality-of-Care/Maternal-and-Infant-Health-Care-Quality.html Accessed December 30, 2016.
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, The 6/18 initiative: prevent unintended pregnancy. 2016.
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC winnable battles final report. 2016, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
21. Institute of Medicine, Clinical preventive Services for Women: Closing the gaps. 2011, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
22. IOM Committee on Core Metrics for Better Health at Lower Cost, Blumenthal, D., Malphrus, E., McGinnis, M., (eds.) Vital signs: core metrics for health and health care progress, 2015, National Academies Press, Washington DC.
23. Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the Health Resources and Services Administration, Collaborative Improvement & Innovation Networks (CoIINs): perinatal and infant health. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-childhealth-initiatives/collaborative-improvement-innovation-networks-coiins Accessed January 8, 2017.
24. US Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy people 2020 objectives: family planning. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=13 Accessed October 17, 2013.
25. National Prevention Council, National prevention strategy. 2011, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, Washington DC.
26. US Census Bureau, Age and sex composition in the United States. 2012, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.
27. Frost, J., Frohwirth, L., Zolna, M., Contraceptive needs and services, 2014 update. 2016, The Guttmacher Institute, Washington DC.
28. Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., Mosher, W., Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. In. 2015, US National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
29. Jones, R., Tapales, A., Lindberg, L., Frost, J., Using longitudinal data to understand changes in consistent contraceptive use. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 47:3 (2015), 131–139.
30. Finer, L.B., Zolna, M.R., Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. N Engl J Med 374:9 (2016), 843–852.
31. Copen, C., Thomas, M., Kirmeyer, S., Interpregnancy intervals in the United States: data from the birth certificate and the National Survey of Family Growth. National vital statistics reports, 2015, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.
32. Curtin, S.C., Abma, J.C., Ventura, S.J., Henshaw, S.K., Pregnancy rates for U.S. women continue to drop. NCHS Data Brief 136 (2013), 1–8.
33. Hamilton, B.E., Mathews, T.J., Continued declines in teen births in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief 259 (2016), 1–8.
34. Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermudez, A., Kafury-Goeta, A.C., Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 295:15 (2006), 1809–1823.
35. DeFranco, E.A., Seske, L.M., Greenberg, J.M., Muglia, L.J., Influence of interpregnancy interval on neonatal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:3 (2015), 386.e381–386.e389.
36. Gipson, J.D., Koenig, M.A., Hindin, M.J., The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 39:1 (2008), 18–38.
37. Sawhill, I., Karpilow, Q., Venator, J., Families CoCa, (eds.) The impact of unintended childbearing on future generations, 2014, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
38. Tsui, A.O., McDonald-Mosley, R., Burke, A.E., Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev 32:1 (2010), 152–174.
39. Hoffman, S., Maynard, R., Kids having kids: economic costs and social consequences of teen pregnancy. 2nd ed., 2008, Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC.
40. Sonfield, A., Kost, K., Institute TG, (eds.) Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy and infant care: estimates for 2010, 2015, The Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY.
41. Hoffman, S., Counting it up: the public costs of teen childbearing. 2010, The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, Washington, DC.
42. Foster, D.G., Biggs, M.A., Malvin, J., Bradsberry, M., Darney, P., Brindis, C.D., Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009. Womens Health Issues 23:4 (2013), e265–e271.
43. Han, L., Sheeder, J., Teal, S., Tocce C. Cost-effectiveness of immediate postpartum esonogestrel implant insertion for adolescent mothers Contraception 86 (2012), 290–325.
44. Frost, J., Finer, L., Tapales, A., The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings. J Health Care Poor Underserved 19:3 (2008), 778–796.
45. Thomas, A., Three strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy. J Policy Anal Manage 31:2 (2012), 280–311.
46. ACOG Committee on Adolescent Health Care, Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Committee opinion, 2014, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, 1–7 [reaffirmed].
47. Ott, M.A., Sucato, G.S., Committee on A, Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics 134:4 (2014), e1257–e1281.
48. CDC, OPA, Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of the CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep 63:4 (2014), 1–54.
49. CDC, U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use 2016. MMWR 65:4 (2016), 1–66.
50. Trussell, J., Contraceptive efficacy. Hatcher, R., Trussell, J., Nelson, A., Cates, W., Kowal, D., (eds.) Contraceptive technology, Twentieth revised edition, 2011, Ardent Media, New York, 777–861.
51. Mansour, D., Inki, P., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Efficacy of contraceptive methods: a review of the literature. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 15:Suppl. 2 (2010), S19–S31.
52. Winner, B., Peipert, J., Zhao, Q., Buckel, C., Madden, T., Allsworth, J., et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 366:21 (2012), 1998–2007.
53. Harper, C.C., Rocca, C.H., Thompson, K.M., Morfesis, J., Goodman, S., Darney, P.D., et al. Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet, 2015.
54. Dehlendorf, C., Bellanca, H., Policar, M., Performance measures for contraceptive care: what are we actually trying to measure?. Contraception 91:6 (2015), 433–437.
55. Gold, J., Guarding against coercion while ensuring access: a delicate balance. Guttmacher Policy Rev 17:3 (2014), 8–14.
56. Dehlendorf, C., Henderson, J.T., Vittinghoff, E., Grumbach, K., Levy, K., Schmittdiel, J., et al. Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:1 (2016), 78.e71–78.e79.