Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Foster, Diana Greene ^a   Biggs, Maria Antonia ^a   Malvin, Jan ^b   Bradsberry, Mary ^b   Darney, Philip ^b   Brindis, Claire D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BARRIER CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; ORAL CONTRACEPTION; PREGNANCY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; COST SAVINGS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84879805742     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: 18784321     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amaral G., Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Jasik C.B., Judd S., Brindis C.D. Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: A cost analysis of family planning services in California. Health Services Research 2007, 42(5):1960-1980.
2. Biggs M.A., Foster D.G., Hulett D., Brindis C.D. Cost-benefit analysis of the California Family PACT Program for calendar year 2007 2010, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
3. Biggs M.A., Rostovtseva D.P., Brindis C.D. Findings from the 2007 Family PACT client exit interviews 2009, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco.
4. Family PACT program report, FY10/11 2012, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento.
5. 2011 Family PACT medical record review 2012, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Sacramento.
6. Callegari L.S., Parisi S.M., Schwarz E.B. Perceptions of intrauterine contraception among women seeking primary care. Contraception 2013, S0010-7824(13)00048-6.
7. Chiou C.F., Trussell J., Reyes E., Knight K., Wallace J., Udani J., et al. Economic analysis of contraceptives for women. Contraception 2003, 68(1):3-10.
8. Finer L.B., Kost K. Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2011, 43(2):78-87.
9. Forrest J.D., Samara R. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures. Family Planning Perspectives 1996, 28(5):188-195.
10. Forrest J.D., Singh S. Public-sector savings resulting from expenditures for contraceptive services. Family Planning Perspectives 1990, 22(1):6-15.
11. Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Rostovtseva D., de Bocanegra H.T., Darney P.D., Brindis C.D. Estimating the fertility effect of expansions of publicly funded family planning services in California. Womens Health Issues 2011, 21(6):418-424.
12. Foster D.G., Rostovtseva D.P., Brindis C.D., Biggs M.A., Hulett D., Darney P.D. Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program. American Journal of Public Health 2009, 99(3):446-451.
13. Frost J.J., Finer L.B., Tapales A. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2008, 19(3):778-796.
14. Gariepy A.M., Simon E.J., Patel D.A., Creinin M.D., Schwarz E.B. The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance. Contraception 2011, 84(6):e39-e42.
15. Lewis L.N., Doherty D.A., Hickey M., Skinner S.R. Implanon as a contraceptive choice for teenage mothers: A comparison of contraceptive choices, acceptability and repeat pregnancy. Contraception 2010, 81(5):421-426.
16. Mavranezouli I. Health economics of contraception. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2009, 23(2):187-198.
17. Osler M., David H.P., Morgall J.M. Multiple induced abortions: Danish experience. Patient Education and Counseling 1997, 31(1):83-89.
18. Thompson K.M., Speidel J.J., Saporta V., Waxman N.J., Harper C.C. Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2011, 83(1):41-47.
19. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. [Review]. Contraception 2011, 83(5):397-404.
20. Trussell J. Update on and correction to the cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2012, 85(6):611.
21. Trussell J., Henry N., Hassan F., Prezioso A., Law A., Filonenko A. Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: Potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2013, 87(2):154-161.
22. Trussell J., Lalla A.M., Doan Q.V., Reyes E., Pinto L., Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009, 79(1):5-14.
23. Trussell J., Leveque J.A., Koenig J.D., London R., Borden S., Henneberry J., et al. The economic value of contraception: A comparison of 15 methods. American Journal of Public Health 1995, 85(4):494-503.