An ontology-based model for prognostics and health management of machines

Journal of Industrial Information Integration

Volumn 6, Issue , 2017, Pages 33-46

  Nuñez, David Lira ^a   Borsato, Milton ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cyber physical systems; Dependability analysis; Ontology engineering; Prognostics health management

Indexed keywords

CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEM; DECISION MAKING; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FLOW CONTROL; HEALTH; MANUFACTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (CPS); DEPENDABILITY ANALYSIS; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCHES (DSR); HEALTH MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; ONTOLOGY ENGINEERING; PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENTS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85020117490     PISSN: 2452414X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Wang, L., Törngren, M., Onori, M., Current, status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 37, Part 2 (2015), 517–527.
2. Pisching, M.A., Junqueira, F., Santos Filho, D.J., Miyagi, P.E., Service Composition in the Cloud-Based Manufacturing Focused on the Industry 4.0. Technol. Innov. Cloud Based Eng. Syst., 2015, 65–72.
3. Gorecky, D., Schmitt, M., Loskyll, M., Zuhlke, D., Human-machine-interaction in the industry 4.0 era, Industrial Informatics (INDIN). 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on, 2014, 289–294.
4. Cyber-Physical Systems, A Concept Map of CPS, 2012, Acessed: 20 August 2016, Available: http://cyberphysicalsystems.org/.
5. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Cyber-Physical Systems in Future Maintenance. 2015, Springer, 299–305 9th WCEAM Research Papers.
6. Gao, R., Wang, L., Teti, R., Dornfeld, D., Kumara, S., Mori, M., Helu, M., Cloud-enabled prognosis for manufacturing. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 64, 2015, 749–772.
7. Lee, J., Wu, F., Zhao, W., Ghaffari, M., Liao, L., Siegel, D., Prognostics, and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 42 (2014), 314–334.
8. Wang, W., A scheduling model for systems with task and health dependent remaining useful life prognostics. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52 (2014), 5764–5779.
9. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 17359, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - general guidelines, 2011.
10. Lee, J., Ardakani, H.D., Yang, S., Bagheri, B., Industrial big data analytics and cyber-physical systems for future maintenance & service innovation. Procedia CIRP 38 (2015), 3–7.
11. Kandukuri, S.T., Klausen, A., Karimi, H.R., Robbersmyr, K.G., A review of diagnostics and prognostics of low-speed machinery towards wind turbine farm-level health management. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016), 697–708.
12. Elghazel, W., Bahi, J., Guyeux, C., Hakem, M., Medjaher, K., Zerhouni, N., Dependability of wireless sensor networks for industrial prognostics and health management. Comput. Ind. 68 (2015), 1–15.
13. Ragab, A., Ouali, M.-S., Yacout, S., Osman, H., Remaining useful life prediction using prognostic methodology based on logical analysis of data and Kaplan–Meier estimation. J. Intell. Manuf., 2014, 1–16.
14. Heng, A., Zhang, S., Tan, A.C.C., Mathew, J., Rotating machinery prognostics: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 23 (2009), 724–739.
15. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13381–1, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - prognostics - Part 1: general guidelines, 2015.
16. Lu, C., Tao, L., Fan, H., An intelligent approach to machine component health prognostics by utilizing only truncated histories. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 42 (2014), 300–313.
17. Ali, S., Pievatolo, A., High quality process monitoring using a class of inter-arrival time distributions of the renewal process. Comput. Ind. Eng. 94 (2016), 45–62.
18. Scholz-Reiter, B., Kück, M., Lappe, D., Prediction of customer demands for production planning – Automated selection and configuration of suitable prediction methods. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 63 (2014), 417–420.
19. Umeda, Y., Takata, S., Kimura, F., Tomiyama, T., Sutherland, J.W., Kara, S., Herrmann, C., Duflou, J.R., Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning—An environmental perspective. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 61 (2012), 681–702.
20. Vogl, G.W., Weiss, B.A., Donmez, M.A., Standards Related to Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) For Manufacturing. 2014, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, NISTIR.
21. Yin, Y.H., Nee, A.Y.C., Ong, S.K., Zhu, J.Y., Gu, P.H., Chen, L.J., Automating design with intelligent human–machine integration. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 64 (2015), 655–677.
22. Fraser, K., Facilities management: the strategic selection of a maintenance system. J. Facilities Manage. 12 (2014), 18–37.
23. Azadeh, A., Asadzadeh, S.M., Salehi, N., Firoozi, M., Condition-based maintenance effectiveness for series–parallel power generation system—A combined Markovian simulation model. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety 142 (2015), 357–368.
24. Zhao, F., Tian, Z., Zeng, Y., A stochastic collocation approach for efficient integrated gear health prognosis. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 39 (2013), 372–387.
25. Vogl, G.W., Weiss, B.A., Donmez, M.A., Standards For Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) Techniques within Manufacturing Operations. 2014, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, NISTIR, 8012.
26. Roy, R., Tiwari, A., Tracht, K., Shehab, E., Mehnen, J., Erkoyuncu, J.A., Tapoglou, N., Tomiyama, T., McDonnell, D., Balfe, N., Baraldi, P., O'Donnell, G.E., Proceedings of the 4th International Conference On Through-life Engineering ServicesReducing Uncertainty in PHM By Accounting for Human Factors – A Case Study in the Biopharmaceutical Industry, 38, 2015, Procedia CIRP, 84–89.
27. ElMaraghy, H., Okoh, C., Roy, R., Mehnen, J., Redding, L., Product services systems and value creation. Proceedings of the 6th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems Overview of Remaining Useful Life Prediction Techniques in Through-life Engineering Services, 16, 2014, Procedia CIRP, 158–163.
28. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13372, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - Vocabulary, 2012.
29. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 60050-192, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary -Part 192: Dependability, 2015.
30. Van Horenbeek, A., Van Ostaeyen, J., Duflou, J.R., Pintelon, L., Quantifying the added value of an imperfectly performing condition monitoring system—Application to a wind turbine gearbox. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety 111 (2013), 45–57.
31. Esmaeilian, B., Behdad, S., Wang, B., The evolution and future of manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Syst. 39 (2016), 79–100.
32. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.-A., A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 3 (2015), 18–23.
33. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13374-1, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - Data processing, communication and presentation - Part 1: General guidelines, 2003.
34. Kao, H.-A., Jin, W., Siegel, D., Lee, J., A cyber physical interface for automation systems—methodology and examples. Machines 3 (2015), 93–106.
35. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 15704, Industrial automation systems – Requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies, 2000.
36. Commission, I.E., Enterprise-control system integration -Part 1: models and terminology. Comitê: TC 184/SC 5, 2013.
37. Machinery Information Management Open System Alliance, OSA-EAI V3.2.3, MIMOSA's Open System Architecture for Enterprise Application Integration.
38. Technical Architecture Summary, 2012.
39. Bukowski, L., System of systems dependability – Theoretical models and applications examples. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety 151 (2016), 76–92.
40. Avižienis, A., Laprie, J.-C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C., Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. Depend. Secure Comput. IEEE Trans. 1 (2004), 11–33.
41. Colledani, M., Tolio, T., Fischer, A., Iung, B., Lanza, G., Schmitt, R., Váncza, J., Design and management of manufacturing systems for production quality. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 63 (2014), 773–796.
42. Affonso, L.O.A., Equipamentos Mecânicos: Análise De Falhas E Solução De Problemas. 2002, Qualitymark Editora Ltda.
43. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC60300-3-1, Dependability Management-Part 3-1: Application guide - Analysis techniques for dependability - Guide on methodology, 2003.
44. Sanislav, T., Mois, G., Miclea, L., An approach to model dependability of cyber-physical systems. Microprocess. Microsyst. 41 (2016), 67–76.
45. Brinzei, N., Mazouni, M.-H., Systems Dependability Assessment: Benefits of Petri Net Models. 2016, John Wiley & Sons.
46. Guo, L., Kang, J., An extended HAZOP analysis approach with dynamic fault tree. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 38 (2015), 224–232.
47. Sanislav, T., Miclea, L., A dependability modeling approach for cyber-physical systems. J. Comput. Sci. Control Syst. 8 (2015), 23–28.
48. Zhou, A., Yu, D., Zhang, W., A research on intelligent fault diagnosis of wind turbines based on ontology and FMECA. Adv. Eng. Inf. 29 (2015), 115–125.
49. Snooke, N., Price, C., Automated FMEA based diagnostic symptom generation. Adv. Eng. Inf. 26 (2012), 870–888.
50. Yuan, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, X., Predictive maintenance of shield tunnels. Tunnel. Underground Sp. Technol. 38 (2013), 69–86.
51. Medina-Oliva, G., Voisin, A., Monnin, M., Leger, J.-B., Predictive diagnosis based on a fleet-wide ontology approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 68 (2014), 40–57.
52. Guillén, A.J., Crespo, A., Gómez, J.F., Sanz, M.D., A framework for effective management of condition based maintenance programs in the context of industrial development of E-maintenance strategies. Comput. Ind. 82 (2016), 170–185.
53. Du, J., Wang, S., Zhang, H., Layered clustering multi-fault diagnosis for hydraulic piston pump. Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 36 (2013), 487–504.
54. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 13379-1, Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines — Data interpretation and diagnostics techniques - Part 1: General guidelines, 2012.
55. Cooper, H.C., Capture all critical failure modes into FMEA in half the time with a simple decomposition table (Actual case study savings = $4,206,000). 2015 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 2015, 1–6.
56. Ebrahimipour, V., Rezaie, K., Shokravi, S., An ontology approach to support FMEA studies. Expert Syst. Appl. 37 (2010), 671–677.
57. Vogl, G.W., Weiss, B.A., Donmez, M.A., Standards Related to Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) For Manufacturing. 2014, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, NISTIR, 8012.
58. Saalmann, P., Zuccolotto, M., Silva, T.R.d., Wagner, C., Giacomolli, A., Hellingrath, B., Pereira, C.E., Application potentials for an ontology-based integration of intelligent maintenance systems and spare parts supply chain planning. Procedia CIRP 41 (2016), 270–275.
59. International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC60812, Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), 2006.
60. Chanamool, N., Naenna, T., Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl. Soft Comput. 43 (2016), 441–453.
61. Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., Liu, N., Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst. Appl. 40 (2013), 828–838.
62. Aljumaili, M., Wandt, K., Karim, R., Tretten, P., eMaintenance ontologies for data quality support. J. Qual. Mainten. Eng. 21 (2015), 358–374.
63. Gruber, T.R., A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5 (1993), 199–220.
64. Palmer, C., Urwin, E.N., Niknejad, A., Petrovic, D., Popplewell, K., Young, R.I.M., An ontology supported risk assessment approach for the intelligent configuration of supply networks. J. Intel. Manuf., 2016, 1–26.
65. Guarino, N., Formal ontology and information systems. Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the first international conference (FOIS'98), Trento, Italy, 1998, 6–8 JuneIOS press.
66. Safia, B.-B., Aicha, M., Poss-OWL 2: possibilistic extension of OWL 2 for an uncertain geographic ontology. Procedia Comput. Sci. 35 (2014), 407–416.
67. W.W.W. Consortium. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer. 2012, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts (www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer).
68. de Farias, T.M., Roxin, A., Nicolle, C., SWRL rule-selection methodology for ontology interoperability. Data Knowl. Eng. 105 (2016), 53–72.
69. Bautista-Zambrana, M.R., Methodologies to build ontologies for terminological purposes. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 173 (2015), 264–269.
70. Uschold, M., King, M., Towards a Methodology For Building Ontologies. 1995, Citeseer.
71. Gomez-Perez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O., Ontological engineering: with examples from the areas of knowledge management. E-Commerce and the Semantic Web, 2006, Springer Science & Business Media.
72. Staab, S., Studer, R., Schnurr, H.-P., Sure, Y., Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. 2001, IEEE Intelligent systems, 26–34.
73. Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M., Enterprise modeling. AI Mag., 19, 1998, 109.
74. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A., Conceptual analysis of lexical taxonomies: the case of WordNet top-level. Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems-Volume 2001, 2001, ACM, 285–296.
75. Pinto, H.S., Staab, S., Tempich, C., DILIGENT: towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolvInG. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), 2004, 393.
76. Natalya, F.N., Deborah, L., Ontology Development 101: a Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. 2001, Stantford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880.
77. Jarrar, M., Meersman, R., Formal ontology engineering in the dogma approach, on the move to meaningful internet systems 2002: CoopIS. DOA, and ODBASE, 2002, Springer, 1238–1254.
78. Hong, H., Yin, Y., Ontology-based conceptual design for ultra-precision hydrostatic guideways with human–machine interaction. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2 (2016), 11–18.
79. De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., Navigli, R., A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: UPON. Andersen, K.V., Debenham, J., Wagner, R., (eds.) Database and Expert Systems Applications: 16th International Conference, DEXA 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 22-26, 2005. Proceedings, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, 655–664.
80. Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering. Suárez-Figueroa, C.M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., Gangemi, A., (eds.) Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, 2012, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 9–34.
81. Sure, Y., Angele, J., Staab, S., OntoEdit: guiding ontology development by methodology and inferencing. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, 2002, DOA, and ODBASE, Springer, 1205–1222.
82. Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y., Mizoguchi, R., Developing ontology-based applications using Hozo. Comput. Intell., 2005, 273–277.
83. García-Peñalvo, F.J., Colomo-Palacios, R., García, J., Therón, R., Towards an ontology modeling tool. A validation in software engineering scenarios. Expert Syst. Appl. 39 (2012), 11468–11478.
84. Gong, Y., Janssen, M., An interoperable architecture and principles for implementing strategy and policy in operational processes. Comput. Ind. 64 (2013), 912–924.
85. Lau, R.Y.K., Li, C., Liao, S.S.Y., Social analytics: Learning fuzzy product ontologies for aspect-oriented sentiment analysis. Decis. Supp. Syst. 65 (2014), 80–94.
86. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S., A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 24 (2007), 45–77.
87. Graube, M., Pfeffer, J., Ziegler, J., Urbas, L., Linked data as integrating technology for industrial data, network-based information systems (NBiS). 2011 14th International Conference on, 2011, 162–167.
88. Lin, L.F., Zhang, W.Y., Lou, Y.C., Chu, C.Y., Cai, M., Developing manufacturing ontologies for knowledge reuse in distributed manufacturing environment. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49 (2011), 343–359.
89. Stanford University, Protége 5.1.0, Accessed: 20 August 2016, Available: http://protege.stanford.edu/.
90. W.W.W.C. W3C. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language, Accessed: 20 August 2016, Available https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/, 2013.
91. P. McCarthy, Introduction to Jena, 2004, IBM developerWorks, Accessed: 20 Augustt 2016, Available: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jena/.
92. Apache Jena-Fuseki, serving RDF data over HTTP., Accessed: 20 Augusto 2016, Available: http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data.