Predictive maintenance of shield tunnels

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 69-86

  Yuan, Yong ^a   Jiang, Xiaomo ^a   Liu, Xian ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Condition based maintenance; Damage accumulation model; FMEA; Predictive maintenance; System risk; Weibull distribution

Indexed keywords

CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; DAMAGE ACCUMULATION MODELS; FMEA; PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE; SYSTEM RISK;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEFECTS; INSPECTION; PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIELDING; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

REPAIR;

DAMAGE; FAILURE MECHANISM; NUMERICAL MODEL; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SHIELD; TUNNEL LINING; WEIBULL THEORY;

EID: 84879478695     PISSN: 08867798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2013.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ACI 365, 2000. Service-Life Prediction, State-of-the-art Report. American Concrete Institute, Cleveland, OH.
2. AFTES Recommendation for the treatment of water inflows and outflows in operated underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1989, 3(4):343-407.
3. Amari, S.V., McLaughlin, L., Pham, H., 2006. Cost-effective condition-based maintenance using Markov decision processes. In: Proceedings of Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS '06), January 23-26, 2006, Newport Beach, CA.
4. Asakura T., Kojima Y. Tunnel maintenance in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2003, 18(2/3):161-169.
5. Babuska I., Oden J.T. Verification and validation in computational engineering and science: basic concepts. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004, 193(36-38):4057-4066.
6. CEB-FIP Model Code 1993, Thomas Telford Services Ltd., London.
7. CEN, 1990. Eurocode - Basis of Structural Design (EN 1990), Brussels.
8. Cheng G., Plumtree A. A fatigue damage accumulation model based on continuum damage mechanics and ductility exhaustion. International Journal of Fatigue 1998, 20(7):495-501.
9. Coh C.J., Tang L.C., Lim S.C. Reliability modelling of stochastic wear-out failure. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1989, 25(4):303-314.
10. Delatte, N., Chen, S., Maini, N., Parker, N., Agrawal, A., Mylonakis, G., Subramaniam, K., Kawaguchi, A., Bosela, P., McNeil, S., Miller, R., 2003. The Application of Nondestructive Evaluation to Subway Tunnel Systems. Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
11. Dimitri K. Reliability Engineering Handbook 1991, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
12. DoD (Department of Defense), 1980. Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode Effect and Critical Analysis. MIL-P-1629A, Washington, DC.
13. DoD (Department of Defense), 2008. Condition Based Maintenance plus DoD Guidance. Deputy under Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Material Readiness, Washington, DC. <. http://www.acq.osd.mil/log/mpp/cbm+/CBM_DoD_Guidebook_May08.pdf>.
14. Engel P.A. Failure models for mechanical wear modes and mechanisms. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1993, 42(2):262-267.
15. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2004. Highway and Rail Transit Tunnel Maintenance and Rehabilitation Manual. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/Bridge/tunnel/maintman00.cfm.
16. FTA (Federal Transit Administration), 1997. Inspection Policy and Procedures for Rail Transit Tunnels and Underground Structures. TCRP Synthesis 23, Transportation Research Board National Research Council. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tsyn23.pdf.
17. GB 50153, 1993. Unified Standard for Reliability Design of Engineering Structures. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
18. Gelman A., Hill J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. first ed.
19. Haack A., Schreyer J., Jackel G. State-of-the-art of non-destructive testing methods for determining the state of a tunnel lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1995, 10(4):413-431.
20. Ihara C., Tanaka T. Mode I fatigue crack-propagation mechanism based on the renewal stochastic damage-accumulation model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2007, 74(9):1488-1498.
21. ISO 2394, 1998. General Principles on Reliability for Structures, Switzerland.
22. Jiang X. Recent development of damage diagnosis and prognosis in engineering systems. Recent Patents in Engineering 2010, 4(2):1-20.
23. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian risk-based decision method for model validation under uncertainty. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2007, 92(6):707-718.
24. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian wavelet method for multivariate model assessment of dynamic systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2008, 312(4-5):694-712.
25. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian validation assessment of multivariate computational models. Journal of Applied Statistics 2008, 35(1):49-65.
26. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian inference method for model validation and confidence extrapolation. Journal of Applied Statistics 2009, 36(6):659-677.
27. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian structural equation modelling method for hierarchical model validation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2009, 94(4):796-809.
28. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Bayesian nonlinear SEM approach for hierarchical validation of dynamical systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2010, 24(4):957-975.
29. Jiang X., Mahadevan S. Wavelet coherence analysis for model validation of dynamic systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2011, 25(2):575-590.
30. Jiang X., Yuan Y., Liu X. Bayesian inference method for stochastic damage accumulation modeling. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2012, 10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.006.
31. Jiang X., Yuan Y., Mahadevan S., Liu X. An investigation of Bayesian inference approach to model validation with non-normal data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 2012, 10.1080/00949655.2012.672572.
32. Jiang, X., Yuan, Y., Liu, X., in preparation. Probabilistic lifing analysis for concrete spalling in tunnel structures. Structural Safety.
33. Mahadevan S., Rebba R. Validation of reliability computational models using Bayes networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005, 87(2):223-232.
34. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration), 1966. Procedure for Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). RA-006-013-1A, Washington, DC.
35. Nývlt O., Prívara S., Ferkl L. Probabilistic risk assessment of highway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2011, 26(1):71-82.
36. Oberkampf W.L., Barone M.F. Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. Journal of Computational Physics 2006, 217(1):5-36.
37. Oberkampf W.L., Trucano T.G. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2002, 38(3):209-272.
38. Oberkampf, W., Deland, S.M., Rutherford, B.M., Diegert, K.V., Alvin, K.F., 1999. A new methodology for the estimation of total uncertainty in computational simulation. In: Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, St. Louis, MO.
39. Pinteton L.M., Herz A.P. Maintenance: an evolutionary perspective. Complex Systems Maintenance Handbook 2008, Springer Verlag, London. K.A.H. Kobbacy, D.N.P. Murthy (Eds.).
40. Rausand M. Reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1998, 60(2):121-132.
41. Rebba R., Mahadevan S. Computational methods for model reliability assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2008, 93(8):1197-1207.
42. Richards J.A. Inspection, maintenance and repair of tunnels: international lessons and practice. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 1998, 13(4):369-375.
43. Rudra B., Jennings D. Failure mechanism models for conductive filament formation. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 1994, 43(3):354-360.
44. Russell, H.A., Gilmore, J., 1997. Inspection Policy and Procedures for Rail Transit Tunnels and Underground Structures. Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis 23, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
45. SAE (Society for Automotive Engineers), 1967. Design Analysis Procedure for Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). ARP926.
46. Seweryn A., Buczyński A., Szusta J. Damage accumulation model for low cycle fatigue. International Journal of Fatigue 2008, 30(4):756-765.
47. Stephens M.A. EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1974, 69(347):730-737.
48. Sutrisno S., Lee T.-R. Service reliability assessment using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA): survey and opportunity roadmap. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology 2011, 3(7):25-38.
49. Szusta J., Seweryn A. Low-cycle fatigue model of damage accumulation - the strain approach. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2010, 77(10):1604-1616.
50. Tinga T. Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2010, 95(10):1061-1075.
51. Walls L., Quigley J. Building prior distributions to support Bayesian reliability growth models using expert judgement. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2001, 74(2):117-128.
52. Yang K., Younis H. A semi-analytical Monte Carlo simulation method for system's reliability with load sharing and damage accumulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2005, 87(2):191-200.
53. Younis R., Knight M.A. A probability model for investigating the trend of structural deterioration of wastewater pipelines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2010, 25(6):670-680.
54. Yuan Y., Bai Y., Liu J. Assessment service state of tunnel structure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2012, 27(1):72-85.
55. Yuan, Y., Jiang, X., Liu, X., in preparation. Multivariate probabilistic modeling for seepage risk assessment in tunnel segments. International Journal of Geomechanics.
56. Zhang R., Mahadevan S. Bayesian methodology for reliability model acceptance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2003, 80(1):95-103.