Ontology-based conceptual design for ultra-precision hydrostatic guideways with human–machine interaction

Journal of Industrial Information Integration

Volumn 2, Issue , 2016, Pages 11-18

  Hong, Haibo ^a   Yin, Yuehong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

High dimensional information integration; Human machine integrated conceptual design; Information integration; Ontology

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; GRINDING (MACHINING); GRINDING MACHINES; GRINDING MILLS; GUIDEWAYS; HYDRAULICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

DECISION MAKING PROCESS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; HUMAN-MACHINE; HYDROSTATIC GUIDEWAYS; IMAGINAL THINKINGS; INFORMATION INTEGRATION; ULTRA PRECISION; ULTRAPRECISION GRINDING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85010369986     PISSN: 2452414X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2016.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. [1] Tomiyama, T., Gu, P.H., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C., Kimura, F., Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. Ann. CIRP 58:2 (2009), 543–565.
2. [2] Leadbeater, P.B., Clarke, M., Wills-Moren, W.J., Wilson, T.J., A unique machine for grinding large, off-axis optical components: the OAGM 2500. Precis. Eng. 11:4 (1989), 389–391.
3. [3] Xu, L.D., Wang, C., Bi, Z., Yu, J., Object-oriented templates for automated assembly planning of complex products. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 11:2 (2014), 492–503.
4. [4] Kane, N.R., Sihler, J., Slocum, A.H., A hydrostatic rotary bearing with surface self-compensation. J. Precis. Eng. 27:2 (2003), 125–139.
5. [5] Mekid, S., High precision linear slide. Part I: design and construction. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40 (2000), 1039–1050.
6. [6] Li, Y.M., Zhao, S.N., The application of the ultra-precision spindle system in precision machine tools and instruments. Proceedings of CIRP Conference on PE & MS, 1991, 559–565.
7. [7] Paul, G., Beitz, W., Engineering Design: A System Approach. 1996, Springer.
8. [8] Yin, Y.H., Nee, A.Y., Ong, S.K., Zhu, J.Y., Gu, P.H., Chen, L.J., Automating design with intelligent human–machine integration. Ann. CIRP 64:2 (2015), 3–25.
9. [9] Tomiyama, T., Yoshioka, M., Tsumaya, A., A knowledge operation model of synthesis. Chakrabarti, A., (eds.) Engineering Design Synthesis-Understanding, Approaches and Tools, 2002, Springer, London, 67–90.
10. [10] Gruber, T., Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43:4–5 (1995), 907–928.
11. [11] Studer, R., Benjamins, V.R., Fensel, D., Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data Knowl. Eng. 25:1 (1998), 161–197.
12. [12] Lenat, D.B., CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Commun. ACM 38:11 (1995), 33–38.
13. [13] Chungoora, N., Young, R.I., Gunendran, G., Palmer, C., Usman, Z., Anjum, N.A., Cutting-Decelle, A.F., Harding, J.A., Case, K., A model-driven ontology approach for manufacturing system interoperability and knowledge sharing. Comput. Ind. 64:4 (2013), 392–401.
14. [14] Altuna, A., Cabrerizo, A., Laresgoiti, I., Peria, N., Sastre, D., Co-operative and distributed configuration. Object-Oriented and Internet-Based Technologies, 2004, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 69–80.
15. [15] Hirtz, J., Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Szykman, S., Wood, K.L., A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res. Eng. Des. 13:2 (2002), 65–82.
16. [16] Roy, R., Kerr, C.I.V., Sackett, P.J., Corbett, J., Design requirements management using an ontological framework. Ann. CIRP 54:1 (2005), 109–112.
17. [17] López, M.F., Gómez-Pérez, A., Sierra, J.P., Sierra, A.P., Building a chemical ontology using methontology and the ontology design environment. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14:1 (1999), 37–46.
18. [18] Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R., On-to-knowledge methodology (OTKM). Handbook on ontologies, 2004, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 117–132.
19. [19] De Nicola, A., Missikoff, M., Navigli, R., A proposal for a unified process for ontology building: UPON. Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2005, Springer, Berlin, 655–664.
20. [20] Pinto, H.S., Staab, S., Tempich, C., DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 110, 2004, 393.
21. [21] Suarez-Figueroa, M.C., Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez, L.M., The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering. Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, 2012, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 9–34.
22. [22] Hernandez, N.V., Shah, J.J., Smith, S.M., Cognitive models of design ideation. Proceedings of the ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2007, 1–10.
23. [23] Yin, Y.H., Zhou, C., Zhu, J.Y., A pipe route design methodology by imitating human imaginal thinking. Ann. CIRP 59:1 (2010), 167–170.
24. [24] Bassani, R., Piccigallo, B., Hydrostatic Lubrication. 1992, Elsevier Science Publishers, Netherlands.
25. [25] Shore, P., Morantz, P., Luo, X., Tonnellieretc, big optix ultra-precision grinding/measuring system. Proceedings of 2005 SPIE, 5965, 2005, 241–248.
26. [26] Gero, J.S., Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag., 11(4), 1990, 26.
27. [27] Shu, L.H., Ueda, K., Chiu, I., Cheong, H., Biologically inspired design. Ann. CIRP 60:2 (2011), 673–693.
28. [28] Kang, Y., Chen, C.H., Lee, H.H., Hung, Y.H., Hsiao, S.T., Design for static stiffness of hydrostatic bearings: single-action variable compensations. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 63:2 (2011), 103–118.
29. [29] Kang, Y., Lee, J.L., Huang, H.C., Lin, C.Y., Lee, H.H., Peng, D.X., Huang, C.C., Design for static stiffness of hydrostatic plain bearings: constant compensations. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 63:3 (2011), 178–191.
30. [30] Newell, A., Physical symbol systems. Cognitive science 4:2 (1980), 135–183.
31. [31] Fodor, J.A., Pylyshyn, Z.W., Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28:1 (1988), 3–71.
32. [32] Brooks, R., The relationship between matter and life. Nature 409:6818 (2001), 409–411.
33. [33] Yin, Y.H., Xie, J.Y., Xu, L.D., Chen, H., Imaginal thinking based human-machine design methodology for the configuration of reconfigurable machine tools. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 8:3 (2012), 659–668.
34. [34] Yin, Y.H., Xu, L.D., Bi, Z., Chen, H., Zhou, C., A novel human-machine collaborative interface for aero-engine pipe routing. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9:4 (2013), 2187–2199.
35. [35] Schank, R.C., Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. 1982, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36. [36] Kolodner, J.L., An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 6:1 (1992), 3–34.
37. [37] Porter, B., Bareiss, R., Holte, R., Concept learning and heuristic classification in weak theory domains. Artif. Intell. 45:1–2 (1990), 229–263.
38. [38] Plaza, E., de Mántaras, R.L., A case-based apprentice that learns from fuzzy examples. Methodol. Intell. Syst. 5 (1991), 420–427.
39. [39] Resnik P. (1995) Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9511007.
40. [40] Lin, D., An information-theoretic definition of similarity. ICML 98 (1998), 296–304.
41. [41] Abe, K., Ishikawa, T., Koma, Y., Arai, K., Kitano, M., Development of an ultraprecision grinding machine with trigonal prism type pentahedral structure for 400 mm silicon wafer. Proceedings of 1st Euspen International Conference, Bramen, Germany, 1999, 16–19.
42. [42] Xu, L.D., Enterprise systems: state-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 7:4 (2011), 630–640.
43. [43] Xu, L.D., Engineering informatics: state of the art and future trends. Front. Eng. Manag. 1:3 (2014), 276–288.