The accuracy of implant placement by experienced surgeons: Guided vs freehand approach in a simulated plastic model

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 617-624

  Vermeulen, Jacques ^a  

^a Private practice   (France)

Author keywords

3D implant planning; Freehand surgery; Guided surgery; Implant deviation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85019911128     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5065     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ. Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon's experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol 2012;38:311-323
2. Payer M, Kirmeier R, Jakse N, Perti C, Wegscheider W, Lorenzoni M. Surgical factors influencing mesiodistal implant angulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:265-270
3. Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Mumcu E, özdemir T. Implant positioning errors in freehand and computer-aided placement methods: A singleblind clinical comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:190-204
4. Wöhrle PS. Predictably replacing maxillary incisors with implants using 3-D planning and guided implant surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2014;35:758-762,764-756,768
5. Voulgarakis A, Strub JR, Att W. Outcomes of implants placed with three different flapless surgical procedures: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:476-486
6. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Ozdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: A computed tomography-based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 2010;81:43-51
7. Danza M, Zollino I, Carinci F. Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:1086-1092
8. Pettersson A, Komiyama A, Hultin M, Näsström K, Klinge B. Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:527-537
9. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, Schlegel KA, Eitner S. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method-a combined in vivo-in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:488-493
10. Park C, Raigrodski AJ, Rosen J, Spiekerman C, London RM. Accuracy of implant placement using precision surgical guides with varying occlusogingival heights: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:372-381
11. Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Di Giorgio G, Stefanelli LV, Barbato E. The influence of the tolerance between mechanical components on the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide: A retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:580-588
12. Koop R, Vercruyssen M, Vermeulen K, Quirynen M. Tolerance within the sleeve inserts of different surgical guides for guided implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:630-634
13. Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: An observational case series report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:442-453
14. Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(suppl 6):112-123
15. Noharet R, Pettersson A, Bourgeois D. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: A pilot study in the human cadaver. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:526-532
16. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S, Rothamel D, Wichmann M, Zöller JE. Possibilities and limitations of implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates. Int J Comput Dent 2012;15:9-21
17. Patel N. Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;14(suppl 2):20S-24S
18. Platzer S, Bertha G, Heschl A, Wegscheider WA, Lorenzoni M. Three-dimensional accuracy of guided implant placement: Indirect assessment of clinical outcomes. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:724-734
19. Machtei EE, Oettinger-Barak O, Horwitz J. Axial relationship between dental implants and teeth/implants: A radiographic study. J Oral Implantol 2014;40:425-431
20. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Schutyser F, Boumans T. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:407-413
21. Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:248-254
22. D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: A review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:321-335
23. Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:416-423
24. Komiyama A, Pettersson A, Hultin M, Näsström K, Klinge B. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: An experimental model matching approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:308-313
25. Van de Wiele G, Teughels W, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:1489-1494
26. Pettersson A, Kero T, Söderberg R, Näsström K. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1472-1478
27. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Bergé SJ, et al. An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1154-1163
28. Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, Li J, Zhou Y. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:8442-8449
29. Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:181-188
30. D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Elaut L, De Bruyn H. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:293-303
31. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:394-401
32. Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Boumans T, de Haan AF, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:343-352
33. Ozan O, Orhan K, Turkyilmaz I. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1755-1761
34. Nardi C, Borri C, Regini F, et al. Metal and motion artifacts by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in dental and maxillofacial study. Radiol Med 2015;120:618-626