System-of-systems formulation and disruption analysis for multi-scale critical national infrastructures

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 167, Issue , 2017, Pages 30-41

  Thacker, Scott ^a   Pant, Raghav ^a   Hall, Jim W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disruption analysis; Infrastructure; Interdependence; Multi scale; Network; System of system

Indexed keywords

NETWORKS (CIRCUITS); SYSTEM OF SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

DISRUPTION ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY NETWORKS; FAILURE PROPAGATION; FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCY; INFRASTRUCTURE; INTERDEPENDENCE; MULTI-SCALE; NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE;

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES;

EID: 85019420536     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.04.023     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Cabinet Office, Strategic framework and policy statement on improving the resilience of critical infrastructure to disruption from natural hazards. 2010, Cabinet Office, Whitehall, London.
2. Rinaldi, S.M., Peerenboom, J.P., Kelly, T.K., Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Syst 21:6 (2001), 11–25.
3. Little, R.G., Controlling cascading failure: understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. J Urban Technol 9:1 (2002), 109–123.
4. Buldyrev, S.V., Parshani, R., Paul, G., Stanley, H.E., Havlin, S., Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 464:7291 (2010), 1025–1028.
5. Davis, G., The Auckland electricity supply disruption 1998: emergency management aspects. Aust J Emerg Manag 13:4 (1999), 44–46.
6. United States - Canada power system outage task force, Final report on the August 14th, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: causes and recommendations. 2004, United States Department of Energy and Canadian Department of Natural Resources.
7. BBC. BT suffers huge broadband failure. Retrieved October 3rd, 2011, from 〈www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15154020〉 2011.
8. McMillan, D., Disruptions at Gatwick Airport – Christmas Eve 2013. 2014, Report by David McMillan to the Board of Gatwick Airport Limited.
9. Ouyang, M., Review on modelling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121 (2014), 43–60.
10. Kröger, W., Critical infrastructures at risk: a need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93:12 (2008), 1781–1787.
11. Eusgeld, I., Nan, C., Dietz, S., System-of-systems approach for interdependent critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:6 (2011), 679–686.
12. Hall, J.W., Tran, M., Hickford, A.J., Nicholls, R.J., The future of national infrastructure: a system of systems approach. 2016, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Tran, M., Hall, J.W., Hickford, A.J., Nicholls, R.J., Alderson, D., Barr, S., et al. National infrastructure assessment: analysis of options for infrastructure provision in England and Wales, interim results. 2014, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, GB, 104.
14. Strogatz, S.H., Exploring complex networks. Nature 410:6825 (2001), 268–276.
15. Lewis, T.G., Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. 2006, Wiley.
16. Lewis, T.G., Network science: theory and applications. 2011, John Wiley & Sons.
17. Rinaldi SM. Modelling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on IEEE; 2004. p. 8.
18. Bashan, A., Berezin, Y., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., The extreme vulnerability of interdependent spatially embedded networks. Nat Phys 9:10 (2013), 667–672.
19. Gao, J., Buldyrev, S.V., Havlin, S., Stanley, H.E., Robustness of a network of networks. Phys Rev Lett, 107, 2011, 195701.
20. Shekhtman, L.M., Berezin, Y., Danziger, M.M., Havlin, S., Robustness of a network formed of spatially embedded networks. Phys Rev E, 90, 2014, 012809.
21. LaRocca, S., Johansson, J., Hassel, H., Guikema, S., Topological performance measures as surrogates for physical flow models for risk and vulnerability analysis for electricity power systems. Risk Anal 35:4 (2015), 608–623.
22. Lee, E.E., Mitchell, J.E., Wallace, W.A., Restoration of services in interdependent infrastructure systems: a network flows approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C: Appl Rev 37:6 (2007), 1303–1317.
23. Hernandez-Fajardo, I., Duenas-Osorio, L., Probabilistic study of cascading failures in complex interdependent lifeline systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111:0 (2013), 260–272.
24. Johansson, J., Hassel, H., An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:12 (2010), 1335–1344.
25. Poljansek, K., Bono, F., Gutierrez, E., GIS-based method to assess seismic vulnerability of interconnected infrastructure: a case of EU gas and electricity networks. EU JRC 24275, 2010.
26. Pant, R., Thacker, S., Hall, J.W., Alderson, D., Barr, S., Critical infrastructure impact assessment due to flood exposure. J Flood Risk Manag, 2016, 10.111/jfr3.122288.
27. Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J.P., Moreno, Y., Porter, M.A., Multilayer networks. J Complex Netw 2:3 (2014), 203–371.
28. Boccaletti, S., Bianconi, G., Criado, R., del Genio, C.I., Gómez-Gardeñes, J., Romance, M., Sendiña-Nadal, I., Wang, Z., Zanin, M., The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Phys Rep 544:1 (2014), 1–122.
29. Zimmerman, R., Social implications of infrastructure network interactions. J Urban Technol 8 (2001), 97–119.
30. Dudenhoeffer DD, Permann MR, Manis M. CIMS: a framework for infra- structure interdependency modeling and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference; 2006. p. 478–85.
31. Zhang, P., Peeta, S., A generalized modeling framework to analyze interdependencies among infrastructure systems. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 45:3 (2011), 553–579.
32. Newman, M.E.J., Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E, 70, 2004, 056131.
33. UK Power Network Services. The power behind airports; 2014.
34. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). Digest of UK energy statistics (DUKES); 2012.
35. National Grid, Electricity ten year statement, UK electricity transmission. 2012, National Grid, UK.
36. Barr S, Alderson D, Robson C, Otto A, Hall JW, Thacker S, Pant P. A national scale infrastructure database and modelling environment for the UK. International Symposium for Next Generation Infrastructure, Australia; 2013. 2013.
37. Ordnance Survey, OS mastermap topography. 2015, Ordnance Survey, UK.
38. Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). Civil Aviation Authority: UK Airport Statistics; 2010.
39. Thacker, S., Pant, R., Hall, J.W., Characterizing the vulnerability of future configurations of Great Britain's electricity network infrastructure to climate-related hazards. Vulnerability, Uncertain risk, 2014, 648–657.
40. Office for National Statistics. Census: Digitized boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file]. UK data services census support. Downloaded from 〈 http://edina.ac.uk/census〉 2011.
41. Hagberg A, Swart P, Schult D. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Proceedings of the 7th python in science conference (Scipy 2008) vol. 2008; 2008. p. 11–16.
42. Fredman, M.L., Tarian, R.E., Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms. J ACM (JACM) 34:3 (1987), 596–615.
43. Sallam, A.A., Malik, O.P., Electricity distribution systems. 68, 2011, John Wiley & Sons.
44. Bucholz, B., Styczynski, Z, M., Smart grids – fundamentals and technologies in electricity Networks. 2014, Springer.
45. Burt, G.M., Elders, I.M., Galloway, S.J., Kelly, N.J., Tumilty, R.M., Assessment of highly distributed power systems using an integrated simulation approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A: J Power Energy 222 (2008), 657–668.