CIMS: A framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis

Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 478-485

  Dudenhoeffer, Donald D ^a   Permann, May R ^a   Manic, Milos ^b  

^a IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Idaho   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASCADING EFFECTS; FINANCIAL NETWORKS; IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY (INL); INDIVIDUAL (PSS 544-7); INFRASTRUCTURE INTERDEPENDENCIES; INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS; INTERNATIONAL (CO); MODELING AND ANALYSIS; SIMULATION FRAMEWORK; SIMULATION TOOLS;

EID: 34548777587     PISSN: 08917736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WSC.2006.323119     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. United States Congress. 2001. U.S.A. Patriot Act. Available via 〈http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html〉 [accessed Mar 21, 2006].
2. Clinton, W. J. 1996. Executive Order 13010 - Critical Infrastructure Protection. Federal Register, 1996. Vol. 61, No. 138: 37347-37350.
3. Schmitz, W., and K. A. Neubecker. 2003. Architecture of an Integrated Model Hierarchy: Work Package 6, Deliverable D6.2, ACIP Technical Report IST-2001-37257: 32. Available via 〈http://www.iabg.de/acip/doc/wp6/ D62_architecture.pdf〉 [accessed April 1, 2006].
4. Levy, S. 1992. Artificial Life - A report from the Frontier Where Computers Meet Biology. New York: Vintage Books.
5. Dunn, M., and I.Wigert. 2004. International CIIP Handbook 2004: An Inventory and Analysis of Protection Policies in Fourteen Countries. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology: 243.
6. Rinaldi, S., J. Peerenboom, and T. Kelly. 2001. Identifying, Understanding, and Analyzing Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, IEEE, December, 11-25.
7. Dudenhoeffer, D. D., M. R. Permann, and R. L. Boring. 2006. Decision consequence in complex environments: Visualizing decision impact. In Proceeding of Sharing Solutions for Emergencies and Hazardous Environments. American Nuclear Society Joint Topical Meeting: 9th Emergency Preparedness and Response/11th Robotics and Remote Systems for Hazardous Environments. (In press).
8. Buhne, S. G., and K. Pohl. 2003. Modelling Dependencies between Variations Points in Use Case Diagrams. In Proceeding of 9th Intl. Workshop on Requirements Engineering - Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ'03), Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria.
9. U.S. Department Of Energy Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection. 2001. Critical Infrastructure Interdependencies: Impact of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center A Case Study, p. 10.
10. Rocha, L. M. 1999. Complex System Modeling: Using Metaphors from Nature in Simulation and Scientific Methods. BITS: Computer and Communications News. Los Alamos National Laboratory, November 1999. Available via 〈http://www.c3.lanl.gov/~rocha/complex/csm.html〉 [accessed March 26, 2002].
11. Dudenhoeffer, D. D., M. R. Permann, and E.M. Sussman. 2002. A Parallel Simulation Framework For Infrastructure Modeling And Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, ed E. Yücesan, C. H. Chen, J. L. Snowdon, and J. M. Charnes, 1971-1977. Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.