Topological Performance Measures as Surrogates for Physical Flow Models for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis for Electric Power Systems

Risk Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 608-623

  Larocca, Sarah ^a   Johansson, Jonas ^b,c   Hassel, Henrik ^b,c   Guikema, Seth ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Critical infrastructure; Electric power; Functional models; Load flow; Topological models

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES; ELECTRIC LOAD FLOW; LIQUID METAL COOLED REACTORS; POWER QUALITY; PUBLIC WORKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOPOLOGY;

COMPREHENSIVE RISKS; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC POWER; FUNCTIONAL MODEL; LOAD FLOW; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; TOPOLOGICAL MODELS; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MEASUREMENT;

ELECTRICAL POWER; FLOW MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURROGATE METHOD; TOPOLOGY; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84929953369     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12281     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rinaldi SM. Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2004.
2. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of "small-world" networks. Nature, 1998; 393:440-442.
3. Motter A, Nishikawa T, Lai Y-C. Range-based attack on links in scale-free networks: Are long-range links responsible for the small-world phenomenon? Physical Review E, 2002; 66(6):065103.
4. Crucitti P, Latora V, Marchiori M. A topological analysis of the Italian electric power grid. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2004; 338:92-97.
5. Chassin DP, Posse C. Evaluating North American electric grid reliability using the Barabási-Albert network model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2005; 355:667-677.
6. Holmgren Å. Using graph models to analyze the vulnerability of electric power networks. Risk Analysis, 2006; 26(4):955-969.
7. Wang J-W, Rong L-L. Cascade-based attack vulnerability on the US power grid. Safety Science, 2009; 47(10):1332-1336.
8. Johansson J, Hassel H. Modelling, simulation and vulnerability analysis of interdependent technical infrastructures. Pp. 49-66 in Hokstad P, Utne IB, Vatn J (eds). Risk and Interdependencies in Critical Infrastructures: A Guideline for Analysis. London: Springer-Verlag, 2012.
9. Grubesic TH, Matisziw TC, Murray AT, Snediker D. Comparative approaches for assessing network vulnerability. International Regional Science Review, 2008; 31(1):88-112.
10. Hines P, Cotilla-Sanchez E, Blumsack S. Do topological models provide good information about electricity infrastructure vulnerability? Chaos, 2010; 20(3):033122.
11. Overbye TJ, Cheng X, Sun Y. A comparison of the AC and DC power flow models for LMP calculations. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2004.
12. Chen G, Dong ZY, Hill DJ, Zhang GH, Hua KQ. Attack structural vulnerability of power grids: A hybrid approach based on complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010; 389:595-603.
13. Holme P, Kim B, Yoon C, Han S. Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Physical Review E, 2002; 65(5):056109.
14. Latora V, Marchiori M. Vulnerability and protection of infrastructure networks. Physical Review E, 2005; 71(1):015103.
15. Rosas-Casals M, Valverde S, Solè RV. Topological vulnerability of the European power grid under errors and attacks. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2007; 17(7): 2465-2475.
16. Winkler J, Duenas-Osorio L, Stein R, Subramanian D. Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010; 95(4):323-336.
17. Albert R, Albert I, Nakarado G. Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Physical Review E, 2004; 69(2): 025103.
18. Duenas-Osorio L, Vemuru SM. Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems. Structural Safety, 2009; 31(2): 157-167.
19. Wang K, Zhang B-H, Zhang Z, Yin X-G, Wang B. An electrical betweenness approach for vulnerability assessment of power grids considering the capacity of generators and load. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2011; 390:4692-4701.
20. Jönsson H, Johansson J, Johansson H. Identifying critical components in technical infrastructure networks. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2008; 222(2):235-243.
21. Dobson I, Carreras BA, Lynch VE, Newman DE. An initial model for complex dynamics in electric power system blackouts. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 2001.
22. Carreras BA, Lynch VE, Dobson I, Newman DE. Critical points and transitions in an electric power transmission model for cascading failure blackouts. Chaos, 2002; 12(4):985-994.
23. Dobson I, Chen J, Thorp JS, Carreras BA, Newman DE. Examining criticality of blackouts in power system models with cascading events. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2002.
24. Dobson I, Carreras BA, Newman DE. A probabilistic loading-dependent model of cascading failure and possible implications for blackouts. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2003.
25. Song H, Kezunovic M. Static security analysis based on vulnerability index (VI) and network contribution factor (NCF) method. In Proceedings of the Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia and Pacific, 2005.
26. Pepyne DL. Topology and cascading line outages in power grids. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2007; 16(2):202-221.
27. Arianos S, Bompard E, Carbone A, Xue F. Power grid vulnerability: A complex network approach. Chaos, 2009; 19(1): 013119.
28. Grigg C, Wong P, Albrecht P, Allan R, Bhavaraju M, Billinton R, Chen Q, Fong C, Haddad S, Kuruganty S, Li W, Mukerji R, Patton D, Rau N, Reppen D, Schneider A, Shahidehpour M, Singh C. The IEEE Reliability Test System - 1996. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999; 14(3):1010-1020.
29. Solé RV, Rosas-Casals M, Corominas-Murtra B, Valverde S. Robustness of the European power grids under intentional attack. Physical Review E, 2008; 77(2):026102.
30. Hines P, Cotilla-Sanchez E, Blumsack S. Topological models and critical slowing down: Two approaches to power system blackout risk analysis. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 2011.
31. Johansson J, Jönsson H, Johansson H. Analysing the vulnerability of electric distribution systems: A step towards incorporating the societal consequences of disruptions. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2007; 4(1):4-17.
32. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sánchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, systems research and education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011; 26(1): 12-19.
33. Price WW, Taylor CW, Rogers GJ, Srinivasan K, Concordia C, Pal MK, Bess KC, Kundur P, Agrawal BL, Luini JK, Vaahedi E, Johnson BK. Standard load models for power flow and dynamic performance simulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1995; 10(3):1302-1313.
34. Billinton R, Allan RN. Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 1996.
35. Arnborg S, Andersson G, Hill DJ, Hiskens IA. On undervoltage load shedding in power systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 1997; 19(2):141-149.
36. El Arini M. Optimal dynamic load shedding policy for generation load imbalances including characteristics of loads. International Journal of Energy Research, 1999;23:79-89.
37. Ladhani SS, Rosehart W. Under voltage load shedding for voltage stability overview of concepts and principles. Pp. 1597-1602 in Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Denver, CO, IEEE, June 10, 2004.
38. Taylor CW. Power System Voltage Stability. McGraw-Hill Companies, 1994.