Between Consensus and Denial: Climate Journalists as Interpretive Community

Science Communication

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 399-427

  Brüggemann, Michael ^a   Engesser, Sven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

climate change; climate change skepticism; environmental journalism; interpretive community; science journalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907150211     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547014533662     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adolphsen M.,Lück J.Non-routine interactions behind the scenes of a global media event: How journalists and political PR professionals coproduced the 2010 UN climate conference in Cancún. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, (Special Issue on “Mediated Cross-border Communication”), 2012; 2012. 141-158.
2. Bennett W. L.An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics.Political Communication. 1996;13:373-384
3. Berglez P.Inside, outside, and beyond media logic: Journalistic creativity in climate reporting.Media, Culture & Society. 2011;33:449-465
4. Berkowitz D.,TerKeurst J. V.Community as interpretive community: Rethinking the journalist-source relationship.Journal of Communication. 1999;49:125-136
5. Billett S.Dividing climate change: Global warming in the Indian mass media.Climatic Change. 2010;99:1-16
6. Boykoff M. T.Indian media representations of climate change in a threatened journalistic ecosystem.Climatic Change. 2010;99:17-25
7. Boykoff M. T.Public enemy No. 1? Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change.American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57:796-817
8. Boykoff M. T.,Boykoff J.Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press.Global Environmental Change. 2004;14:125-136
9. BoykoffM. T.Nacu-SchmidtA. (2013). Media coverage of climate change/global warming. Retrieved from http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/media_coverage/index.html
10. Boykoff M. T.,Smith J.Routledge handbook of climate change and society. Lever-Tracy C., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:210-218.
11. Breckenridge J. N.Validating cluster analysis: Consistent replication and symmetry.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2000;35:261-285
12. ClarkD. (2011, April21). Which nations are most responsible for climate change?The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/apr/21/countries-responsible-climate-change
13. Commission of the European Communities. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 372. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_372_en.pdf
14. Commission of the European Communities. (2013). Standard Eurobarometer 79. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb79/eb79_en.htm
15. Crouse T.The boys on the bus. New York, NY: Random House; 1973:
16. Detjen J.,Fico F.,Li X.,Kim Y.Changing work environment of environmental reporters.Newspaper Research Journal. 2000;21:2-11
17. Dunlap R. E.,McCright A. M.Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Dryzek J. S.Norgaard R. B.Schlosberg D., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2011:144-160.
18. Dunwoody S.The science writing inner club: A communication link between science and the lay public.Science, Technology, & Human Values. 1980;5 (30): 14-22
19. Elsasser S. W.,Dunlap R. E.Leading voices in the denier choir: Conservative columnists’ dismissal of global warming and denigration of climate science.American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57:754-776
20. Engels A.,Hüther O.,Schäfer M.,Held H.Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation.Global Environmental Change. 2013;23:1018-1027
21. Fahy D.,Nisbet M. C.The science journalist online: Shifting roles and emerging practices.Journalism. 2011;12:778-793
22. Giannoulis C.,Botetzagias I.,Skanavis C.Newspaper reporters’ priorities and beliefs about environmental journalism: An application of q-methodology.Science Communication. 2010;32:425-466
23. Grundmann R.,Scott M.Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter?.Public Understanding of Science. 2014;23:220-235
24. Haas P. M.Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination.International Organization. 1992;46:1-36
25. Hagen L. M.Opportune witnesses: An analysis of balance in the selection of sources and arguments in the leading German newspapers’ coverage of the census issue.European Journal of Communication. 1993;8:317-343
26. Hanitzsch T.,Hanusch F.,Mellado C.,Anikina M.,Berganza R.,Cangoz I.,..Yuen E. K. W.Mapping journalism cultures across nations.Journalism Studies. 2011;12:273-293
27. Harbinson R.Whatever the weather: Media attitudes to reporting climate change. London, England: Panos Institute Report; 2006:
28. Hayes A. F.Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005:
29. HoffmanA. J. (2011). The growing climate divide. Nature Climate Change, 1, 195-196. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
30. Ivanova A.,Schäfer M. S.,Schlichting I.,Schmidt A.Is there a medialization of climate science? Results from a survey of German climate scientists.Science Communication. 2013;35:626-653
31. Kahan D. M.,Braman D.,Gastil J.,Slovic P.,Mertz C. K.Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the white-male effect in risk perception.Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2007;4:465-505
32. Kepplinger H. M.,Brosius H.-B.,Staab J. F.Instrumental actualization: A theory of mediated conflicts.European Journal of Communication. 1991;6:263-290
33. Leiserowitz A.Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Moser S. C.Dilling L., ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2007:44-63.
34. Leiserowitz A. A.,Maibach E. W.,Roser-Renouf C.,Smith N.,Dawson E.Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust.American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57:818-837
35. Maibach E. W.,Leiserowitz A.,Roser-Renouf C.,Mertz C. K.Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development.PLoS ONE. 2011;6 (3):
36. Maillé M.-È.,Saint-Charles J.,Lucotte M.The gap between scientists and journalists: The case of mercury science in Québec’s press.Public Understanding of Science. 2010;19:70-79
37. McCluskey M.Reporter beat and content differences in environmental stories.Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2008;85:83-98
38. Oreskes N.Beyond the ivory tower: The scientific consensus on climate change.Science. 2004;306:1686
39. Pan Z.,Kosicki G.Framing public life. Reese S.Gandy O.Grant A., ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003:35-65.
40. Peters H. P.Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:14102-14109
41. Peters H. P.,Brossard D.,de Cheveigné S.,Dunwoody S.,Kallfass M.,Miller S.,Tsuchida S.Science-media interface: It’s time to reconsider.Science Communication. 2008;30:266-276
42. Peters H. P.,Heinrichs H. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Klimawandel und Sturmflutrisiken [Public communication about climate change and risks of storm flood]. Jülich, Germany: Forschungszentrum Jülich; 2005:
43. Poortinga W.,Spence A.,Whitmarsh L.,Capstick S.,Pidgeon N. F.Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change.Global Environmental Change. 2011;21:1015-1024
44. Przeworski A.,Teune H.The logic of comparative social inquiry. Malabar, FL: Krieger; 1982:
45. RahmstorfS. (2004). The climate skeptics: In weather catastrophes and climate change: Is there still hope for us? Retrieved from http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/
46. Reinemann C.Routine reliance revisited: Exploring media importance for German political journalists.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2004;81:838-856
47. Revkin A. C.A field guide for science writers. (2006). The daily planet: Why the media stumble over the environment. In BlumD. (Ed.), A field guide for science writers (2nd ed., pp. 222-228). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Blum D., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2006:222-228.
48. Russel C.Science and the media. Kennedy D.Overholser G., ed. Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts & Sciences; 2010:13-43.
49. Sachsman D. B.,Simon J.,Valenti J. M.Regional issues, national norms: A four-region analysis of U.S. environment reporters.Science Communication. 2006;28:93-121
50. Sachsman D. B.,Simon J.,Valenti J. M.Environment reporters in the 21st century. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction; 2010:
51. Schmidt A.,Ivanova A.,Schäfer M. S.Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries.Global Environmental Change. 2013;23:1233-1248
52. Schneider J.Making space for the “nuances of truth”: Communication and uncertainty at an environmental journalists’ workshop. Science Communication. 2010;32:171-201
53. Sigal L. V.Reporters and officials: The organization and politics of newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath; 1973:
54. Smith N.,Leiserowitz A.American evangelicals and global warming.Global Environmental Change. 2013;23:1009-1017
55. Stocking H. S.Communicating Uncertainty. Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Friedman S. M.Dunwoody S.Rogers C. S., ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999:23-41.
56. Sundblad E.-L.,Biel A.,Gärling T.Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons.Environment and Behavior. 2009;41:281-302
57. Weingart P.,Engels A.,Pansegrau P.Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:261-283
58. Wilson K. M.Drought, debate, and uncertainty: Measuring reporters’ knowledge and ignorance about climate change.Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:1-13
59. Zelizer B.Journalists as interpretive communities.Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 1993;10:219-237
60. Zelizer B.The Routledge companion to journalism and the news. Allan S., ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2010:181-190.