Impacts of forestry on boreal forests: An ecosystem services perspective

Ambio

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 743-755

  Pohjanmies, Tähti ^a   Triviño, María ^a   Le Tortorec, Eric ^a   Mazziotta, Adriano ^b   Snäll, Tord ^c   Mönkkönen, Mikko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conflict; Forest management; Sustainability; Timber production; Trade off

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; TRADE-OFF;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; FORESTRY; TAIGA;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FORESTRY; FORESTS; TAIGA;

EID: 85018851481     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: 16547209     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-017-0919-5     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Abson, D.J., H. von Wehrden, S. Baumgärtner, J. Fischer, J. Hanspach, W. Härdtle, H. Heinrichs, A.M. Klein, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Economics 103: 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
2. Asselin, H., M. Larouche, and D. Kneeshaw. 2015. Assessing forest management scenarios on an Aboriginal territory through simulation modeling. Forestry Chronicle 91: 426–435. doi:10.5558/tfc2015-072.
3. Atlegrim, O., and K. Sjöberg. 1996. Response of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) to clear-cutting and single-tree selection harvests in uneven-aged boreal Picea abies forests. Forest Ecology and Management 86: 39–50. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03794-2.
4. Bennett, E.M., G.D. Peterson, and L.J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
5. Biggs, R., M. Schlüter, D. Biggs, E.L. Bohensky, S. BurnSilver, G. Cundill, V. Dakos, T.M. Daw, et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37: 421–448. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836.
6. Bradshaw, C.J.A., and I.G. Warkentin. 2015. Global estimates of boreal forest carbon stocks and flux. Global and Planetary Change 128: 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.02.004.
7. Bradshaw, C.J.A., I.G. Warkentin, and N.S. Sodhi. 2009. Urgent preservation of boreal carbon stocks and biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24: 541–548. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.019.
8. Brandt, J.P., M.D. Flannigan, D.G. Maynard, I.D. Thompson, and W.J.A. Volney. 2013. An introduction to Canada’s boreal zone: Ecosystem processes, health, sustainability, and environmental issues. Environmental Reviews 21: 207–226. doi:10.1139/er-2013-0040.
9. Brassard, B.W., and H.Y.H. Chen. 2006. Stand structural dynamics of North American boreal forests. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25: 115–137. doi:10.1080/07352680500348857.
10. Cardinale, B.J., J.E. Duffy, A. Gonzalez, D.U. Hooper, C. Perrings, P. Venail, A. Narwani, G.M. Mace, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67. doi:10.1038/nature11148.
11. Carpenter, S.R., H.A. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R.S. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A.K. Duraiappah, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 1305–1312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106.
12. Clason, A.J., P.M.F. Lindgren, and T.P. Sullivan. 2008. Comparison of potential non-timber forest products in intensively managed young stands and mature/old-growth forests in south-central British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 1897–1909. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.013.
13. Conference Board of Canada. 2013. Use of Forest Resources. Retrieved 23 September, 2015, from http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/details/environment/use-of-forest-resources.aspx.
14. Costanza, R., R. D’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0.
15. Duchesne, L.C., and S. Wetzel. 2002. Managing timber and non-timber forest product resources in Canada’s forests: Needs for integration and research. The Forestry Chronicle 78: 837–842. doi:10.5558/tfc78837-6.
16. Edwards, D.P., J.A. Tobias, D. Sheil, E. Meijaard, and W.F. Laurance. 2014. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29: 511–520. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.003.
17. Elbakidze, M., K. Andersson, P. Angelstam, G.W. Armstrong, R. Axelsson, F. Doyon, M. Hermansson, J. Jacobsson, et al. 2013. Sustained yield forestry in Sweden and Russia: How does it correspond to sustainable forest management policy? Ambio 42: 160–173. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0370-6.
18. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Desk reference. FAO, Rome, Italy
19. Fayt, P., M.M. Machmer, and C. Steeger. 2005. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers—A literature review. Forest Ecology and Management 206: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.054.
20. Filyushkina, A., N. Strange, M. Löf, E.E. Ezebilo, and M. Boman. 2016. Non-market forest ecosystem services and decision support in Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 31: 99–110. doi:10.1080/02827581.2015.1079643.
21. Gamfeldt, L., T. Snäll, R. Bagchi, M. Jonsson, L. Gustafsson, P. Kjellander, M.C. Ruiz-Jaen, M. Fröberg, et al. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications 4: 1340. doi:10.1038/ncomms2328.
22. Gauthier, S., P. Bernier, T. Kuuluvainen, A.Z. Shvidenko, and D.G. Schepaschenko. 2015. Boreal forest health and global change. Science 349: 819–822. doi:10.1126/science.aaa9092.
23. Grigal, D.F. 2000. Effects of extensive forest management on soil productivity. Forest Ecology and Management 138: 167–185. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00395-9.
24. Gundersen, V.S., and L.H. Frivold. 2008. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7: 241–258. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001.
25. Gundersen, P., A. Laurén, L. Finér, E. Ring, H. Koivusalo, M. Sætersdal, J.-O. Weslien, B.D. Sigurdsson, et al. 2010. Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the Nordic countries. Ambio 39: 555–566. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0073-9.
26. Haines-Young, R.H., and M.B. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystems ecology: A new synthesis, ed. D.G. Raffaelli, and C.L.J. Frid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Harrison, P.A., M. Vandewalle, M.T. Sykes, P.M. Berry, R. Bugter, F. de Bello, C.K. Feld, U. Grandin, et al. 2010. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2791–2821. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x.
28. Harrison, P.A., P.M. Berry, G. Simpson, J.R. Haslett, M. Blicharska, M. Bucur, R. Dunford, B. Egoh, et al. 2014. Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review. Ecosystem Services 9: 191–203. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006.
29. Hartmann, M., C.G. Howes, D. VanInsberghe, H. Yu, D. Bachar, R. Christen, R. Henrik Nilsson, S.J. Hallam, et al. 2012. Significant and persistent impact of timber harvesting on soil microbial communities in Northern coniferous forests. The ISME Journal 6: 2199–2218. doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.84.
30. 2], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: A literature review. New Phytologist 173: 463–480. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01967.x.
31. Jactel, H., B.C. Nicoll, M. Branco, J.R. Gonzalez-Olabarria, W. Grodzki, B. Långström, F. Moreira, S. Netherer, et al. 2009. The influences of forest stand management on biotic and abiotic risks of damage. Annals of Forest Science 66: 701. doi:10.1051/forest/2009054.
32. Jandl, R., M. Lindner, L. Vesterdal, B. Bauwens, R. Baritz, F. Hagedorn, D.W. Johnson, K. Minkkinen, et al. 2007. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration? Geoderma 137: 253–268. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003.
33. Koricheva, J., H. Vehviläinen, J. Riihimäki, K. Ruohomäki, P. Kaitaniemi, and H. Ranta. 2006. Diversification of tree stands as a means to manage pests and diseases in boreal forests: myth or reality? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 324–336. doi:10.1139/x05-172.
34. Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8: 468–479. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x.
35. Kreutzweiser, D.P., P.W. Hazlett, and J.M. Gunn. 2008. Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: A review. Environmental Reviews 16: 157–179. doi:10.1139/A08-006.
36. Kurz, W.A., G. Stinson, G.J. Rampley, C.C. Dymond, and E.T. Neilson. 2008. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105: 1551–1555. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708133105.
37. Kuuluvainen, T. 2009. Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in Northern Europe: The complexity challenge. Ambio 38: 309–315. doi:10.1579/08-A-490.1.
38. Kuuluvainen, T., O. Tahvonen, and T. Aakala. 2012. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: A review. Ambio 41: 720–737. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y.
39. Laudon, H., R.A. Sponseller, R.W. Lucas, M.N. Futter, G. Egnell, K. Bishop, A. Ågren, E. Ring, et al. 2011. Consequences of more intensive forestry for the sustainable management of forest soils and waters. Forests 2: 243–260. doi:10.3390/f2010243.
40. Landry, J.-S., and N. Ramankutty. 2015. Carbon cycling, climate regulation, and disturbances in Canadian forests: Scientific principles for management. Land 4: 83–118. doi:10.3390/land4010083.
41. Liski, J., A. Pussinen, K. Pingoud, R. Mäkipää, and T. Karjalainen. 2001. Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 2004–2013. doi:10.1139/x01-140.
42. Lutz, D.A., and R.B. Howarth. 2014. Valuing albedo as an ecosystem service: Implications for forest management. Climatic Change 124: 53–63. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1109-0.
43. Mace, G.M., K. Norris, and A.H. Fitter. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 19–26. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.
44. Maes, J., C. Liquete, A. Teller, M. Erhard, M.L. Paracchini, J.I. Barredo, B. Grizzetti, A. Cardoso, et al. 2016. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services 17: 14–23. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023.
45. Mattsson, T., L. Finér, P. Kortelainen, and T. Sallantaus. 2003. Brook water quality and background leaching from unmanaged forested catchments in Finland. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 147: 275–297. doi:10.1023/A:1024525328220.
46. Maynard, D.G., D. Paré, E. Thiffault, B. Lafleur, K.E. Hogg, and B. Kishchuk. 2014. How do natural disturbances and human activities affect soils and tree nutrition and growth in the Canadian boreal forest? Environmental Reviews 22: 161–178. doi:10.1139/er-2013-0057.
47. MCPFE (Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe). 2002. Improved Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management as adopted by the MCPFE Expert Level Meeting 7-8 October 2002, Vienna, Austria. Vienna: MCPFE Liaison Unit.
48. Miina, J., J.-P. Hotanen, and K. Salo. 2009. Modelling the abundance and temporal variation in the production of bilberry. Silva Fennica 43: 577–593. doi:10.14214/sf.181.
49. Miina, J., T. Pukkala, J.-P. Hotanen, and K. Salo. 2010. Optimizing the joint production of timber and bilberries. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 2065–2071. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.02.017.
50. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
51. Moen, J., L. Rist, K. Bishop, F.S. Chapin III, D. Ellison, T. Kuuluvainen, H. Petersson, K.J. Puettmann, et al. 2014. Eye on the Taiga: Removing global policy impediments to safeguard the boreal forest. Conservation Letters 7: 408–418. doi:10.1111/conl.12098.
52. Mononen, L., A.-P. Auvinen, A.-L. Ahokumpu, M. Rönkä, N. Aarras, H. Tolvanen, M. Kamppinen, E. Viirret, et al. 2016. National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social–ecological sustainability. Ecological Indicators 61: 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.041.
53. Mori, A.S., K.P. Lertzman, and L. Gustafsson. 2016. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: A research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 12–27. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12669.
54. Mäkelä, A., M. del Río, J. Hynynen, M.J. Hawkins, C. Reyer, P. Soares, M. van Oijen, and M. Tomé. 2012. Using stand-scale forest models for estimating indicators of sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 285: 164–178. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.041.
55. Mönkkönen, M., P. Reunanen, J.S. Kotiaho, A. Juutinen, O.-P. Tikkanen, and J. Kouki. 2011. Cost-effective strategies to conserve boreal forest biodiversity and long-term landscape-level maintenance of habitats. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 717–727. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0461-5.
56. Mönkkönen, M., A. Juutinen, A. Mazziotta, K. Miettinen, D. Podkopaev, P. Reunanen, H. Salminen, and O.-P. Tikkanen. 2014. Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Journal of Environmental Management 134: 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.021.
57. Niemelä, J. 1997. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conservation Biology 11: 601–610. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.06008.x.
58. Nybakken, L., V. Selås, and M. Ohlson. 2013. Increased growth and phenolic compounds in bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) following forest clear-cutting. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28: 319–330. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.749941.
59. Pan, Y., R.A. Birdsey, J. Fang, R. Houghton, P.E. Kauppi, W.A. Kurz, O.L. Phillips, A. Shvidenko, et al. 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333: 988–993. doi:10.1126/science.1201609.
60. Parviainen, J. 2015. Cultural heritage and biodiversity in the present forest management of the boreal zone in Scandinavia. Journal of Forest Research 20: 445–452. doi:10.1007/s10310-015-0499-9.
61. Paukkunen, J., J. Heliölä, and M. Kuussaari. 2007. Habitats and population trends of bumblebees in Finnish agricultural environments. In Biodiversity in Farmland, ed. J. Salonen, M. Keskitalo, and M. Segerstedt, 289–312. Jokioinen: MTT Agrifood Research Finland. (in Finnish, English summary).
62. Potapov, P., A. Yaroshenko, S. Turubanova, M. Dubinin, L. Laestadius, C. Thies, D. Aksenov, A. Egorov, et al. 2008. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecology and Society 13: 51.
63. Power, A.G. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 365: 2959–2971. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143.
64. Rametsteiner, E., and M. Simula. 2003. Forest certification—An instrument to promote sustainable forest management? Journal of Environmental Management 67: 87–98. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00191-3.
65. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G.D. Peterson, and E.M. Bennett. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
66. Raymond, C.M., G.G. Singh, K. Benessaiah, J.R. Bernhardt, J. Levine, H. Nelson, N.J. Turner, B. Norton, et al. 2013. Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 63: 536–546. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7.
67. Roberge, J.-M., H. Laudon, C. Björkman, T. Ranius, C. Sandström, A. Felton, A. Sténs, A. Nordin, et al. 2016. Socio-ecological implications of modifying rotation lengths in forestry. Ambio 45: S109–S123. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0747-4.
68. Rodríguez, A., and J. Kouki. 2015. Emulating natural disturbance in forest management enhances pollination services for dominant Vaccinium shrubs in boreal pine-dominated forests. Forest Ecology and Management 350: 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.029.
69. Ruckstuhl, K.E., E.A. Johnson, and K. Miyanishi. 2008. Introduction. The boreal forest and global change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 363: 2245–2249. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2196.
70. Sandström, C., A. Lindkvist, K. Öhman, and E.-M. Nordström. 2011. Governing competing demands for forest resources in Sweden. Forests 2: 218–242. doi:10.3390/f2010218.
71. Schelhaas, M.-J., G.-J. Nabuurs, and A. Schuck. 2003. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biology 9: 1620–1633. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x.
72. Schröter, M., E.H. van der Zanden, A.P.E. van Oudenhoven, R.P. Remme, H.M. Serna-Chavez, R.S. de Groot, and P. Opdam. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: A synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Letters 7: 514–523. doi:10.1111/conl.12091.
73. Schwenk, W.S., T.M. Donovan, W.S. Keeton, and J.S. Nunery. 2012. Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: Comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Applications 22: 1612–1627. doi:10.1890/11-0864.1.
74. Sherry, E., R. Halseth, G. Fondahl, M. Karjala, and B. Leon. 2005. Local-level criteria and indicators: An Aboriginal perspective on sustainable forest management. Forestry 78: 513–539. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi048.
75. Siiskonen, H. 2007. The conflict between traditional and scientific forest management in 20th century Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 249: 125–133. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.018.
76. Spracklen, D.V., B. Bonn, and K.S. Carslaw. 2008. Boreal forests, aerosols and the impacts on clouds and climate. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 366: 4613–4626. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0201.
77. Taki, H., Y. Yamaura, K. Okabe, and K. Maeto. 2011. Plantation vs. natural forest: Matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields. Scientific Reports 1: 132. doi:10.1038/srep00132.
78. Thompson, I.D., K. Okabe, J.M. Tylianakis, P. Kumar, E.G. Brockerhoff, N.A. Schellhorn, J.A. Parrotta, and R. Nasi. 2011. Forest biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem goods and services: Translating science into policy. BioScience 61: 972–981. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7.
79. Triviño, M., T. Pohjanmies, A. Mazziotta, A. Juutinen, D. Podkopaev, E. Le Tortorec, and M. Mönkkönen. 2017. Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 61–70. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12790.
80. Turtiainen, M., J. Miina, K. Salo, and J.-P. Hotanen. 2013. Empirical prediction models for the coverage and yields of cowberry in Finland. Silva Fennica 47: 1–22. doi:10.14214/sf.1005.
81. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), and UNFF (United Nations Forum on Forests Secreteriat). 2009. Vital Forest Graphics. UNEP/GRID-Arendal.
82. Vanhanen, H., R. Jonsson, Y. Gerasimov, O. Krankina, and C. Messier, ed. 2012. Making boreal forests work for people and nature. IUFRO.
83. Venier, L.A., I.D. Thompson, R. Fleming, J. Malcolm, I. Aubin, J.A. Trofymow, D. Langor, R. Sturrock, et al. 2014. Effects of natural resource development on the terrestrial biodiversity of Canadian boreal forests. Environmental Reviews 22: 457–490. doi:10.1139/er-2013-0075.
84. Vihervaara, P., T. Kumpula, A. Tanskanen, and B. Burkhard. 2010. Ecosystem services—A tool for sustainable management of human–environment systems. Case study Finnish Forest Lapland. Ecological Complexity 7: 410–420. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.12.002.
85. Warkentin, I.G., and C.J.A. Bradshaw. 2012. A tropical perspective on conserving the boreal “lung of the planet”. Biological Conservation 151: 50–52. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.025.
86. Webster, K.L., F.D. Beall, I.F. Creed, and D.P. Kreutzweiser. 2015. Impacts and prognosis of natural resource development on water and wetlands in Canada’s boreal zone. Environmental Reviews 23: 78–131. doi:10.1139/er-2014-0063.
87. Wyatt, S. 2008. First Nations, forest lands, and “aboriginal forestry” in Canada: From exclusion to comanagement and beyond. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 171–180. doi:10.1139/X07-214.
88. Zanchi, G., S. Belyazid, C. Akselsson, and L. Yu. 2014. Modelling the effects of management intensification on multiple forest services: A Swedish case study. Ecological Modelling 284: 48–59. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.04.006.
89. Zeng, H., H. Peltola, H. Väisänen, and S. Kellomäki. 2009. The effects of fragmentation on the susceptibility of a boreal forest ecosystem to wind damage. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 1165–1173. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.003.
90. Zeng, H., J. Garcia-Gonzalo, H. Peltola, and S. Kellomäki. 2010. The effects of forest structure on the risk of wind damage at a landscape level in a boreal forest ecosystem. Annals of Forest Science 67: 111. doi:10.1051/forest/2009090.