Plantation vs. natural forest: Matrix quality determines pollinator abundance in crop fields

Scientific Reports

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Taki, Hisatomo ^a   Yamaura, Yuichi ^b   Okabe, Kimiko ^a   Maeto, Kaoru ^c  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROP; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; JAPAN; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; TREE;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; BEES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; ECOSYSTEM; JAPAN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POLLINATION; TREES;

EID: 84859748629     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep00132     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ricketts, T. H. The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158, 87-99 (2001). (Pubitemid 32550582)
2. Vandermeer, J. & Carvajal, R. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am. Nat. 158, 211-220 (2001). (Pubitemid 32739510)
3. Prevedello, J. A. & Vieira, M. V. Does the type of matrix matteri A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 1205-1223, 10. 1007/s10531-009-9750-z (2010).
4. Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Thies, C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8, 857-874 (2005). (Pubitemid 41009261)
5. Donald, P. F. & Evans, A. D. Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. Journal of Applied Ecology 43, 209-218, 10. 1111/j. 1365-2664. 2006. 01146. x (2006). (Pubitemid 43853936)
6. Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. in Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 2008 Vol. 1134 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences173-200 (Blackwell Publishing, 2008).
7. Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A. & Wilson, J. D. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 182-188, 10. 1016/s0169-5347(03)00011-9 (2003). (Pubitemid 36345737)
8. FAO. State of the world's forests 2007. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007).
9. Brockerhoff, E., Jactel, H., Parrotta, J., Quine, C. & Sayer, J. Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 925-951 (2008).
10. Hartley, M. J. Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 155, 81-95 (2002). (Pubitemid 34107894)
11. Barlow, J. et al. Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 18555-18560, 10. 1073/pnas. 0703333104 (2007). (Pubitemid 350210735)
12. Klein, A. M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274, 303-313 (2007).
13. Ricketts, T. H., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R. & Michener, C. D. Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 12579-12582 (2004). (Pubitemid 39122066)
14. Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. & Thorp, R. W. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 16812-16816, 10. 1073/pnas. 262413599 (2002). (Pubitemid 36034055)
15. Ruttner, F. Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees. (Springer-Verlag, 1988).
16. Kevan, P. G. The Asiatic hive bee: apiculture, biology and role in sustainable development in tropical and subtropical Asia. 315 (Enviroquest Ltd., 1995).
17. Verma, L. R. & Dulta, P. C. Foraging behavior of Apis cerana indica and Apis mellifera in pollinationg apple flowers. Journal of Apicultural Research 25, 197-201 (1986).
18. Verma, L. R. & Partap, U. Foraging behavior of Apis cerana on cauliflower and cabbage and its impact on seed production. Journal of Apicultural Research 33, 231-236 (1994).
19. Partap, U. & Verma, L. R. Pollination of radish by Apis cerana. Journal of Apicultural Research 33, 237-241 (1994).
20. Abrol, D. P. Diversity of pollinating insects visiting litchi flowers (Litchi chinensis Sonn. ) and path analysis of environmental factors influencing foraging behaviour of four honeybee species. Journal of Apicultural Research 45, 180-187 (2006). (Pubitemid 46086012)
21. Kuriakose, G., Sinu, P. A. & Shivanna, K. R. Domestication of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) inWestern Ghats, India: divergence in productive traits and a shift in major pollinators. Annals of Botany 103, 727-733, 10. 1093/aob/mcn262 (2009).
22. Sasaki, M. Wonders of the Japanese honeybee-Biology of Northernmost Apis cerana-. (Kaiyusha, 1999).
23. Yoshida, T. Rearing method and ecology of Japanese honeybee. (Tamagawa University Press, 2000).
24. Nagamitsu, T. & Inoue, T. Differences in pollen sources of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera at a primary beech forest in central Japan. Journal of Apicultural Research 38, 71-78 (1999). (Pubitemid 129495937)
25. Corlett, R. T. Pollination in a degraded tropical landscape: a Hong Kong case study. Journal of Tropical Ecology 17, 155-161 (2001). (Pubitemid 32152154)
26. Taki, H., Okabe, K., Makino, S., Yamaura, Y. & Sueyoshi, M. Contribution of small insects to pollination of common buckwheat, a distylous crop. Annals of Applied Biology 155, 121-129 (2009).
27. Taki, H. et al. Effects of landscape metrics on Apis and non-Apis pollinators and seed set in common buckwheat. Basic and Applied Ecology11, 594-602, 10. 1016/j. baae. 2010. 08. 004 (2010).
28. Ono, M., Igarashi, T., Ohno, E. & Sasaki, M. Unusual thermal defense by a honeybee against mass attack by hornets. Nature 377, 334-336 (1995). (Pubitemid 26448158)
29. Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
30. Osborne, J. L. et al. Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 406-415, 10. 1111/j. 1365-2656. 2007. 01333. x (2008). (Pubitemid 351191046)
31. Zurbuchen, A. et al. Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances. Biol. Conserv. 143, 669-676, 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2009. 12. 003 (2009).
32. Klein, A. M., Cunningham, S. A., Bos, M. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89, 935-943 (2008). (Pubitemid 351620058)
33. Woodley, S. J., Johnson, G., Freedman, B. & Kirk, D. A. Effects of timber harvesting and plantation development on cavity-nesting birds in New Brunswick. Can. Field-Nat. 120, 298-306 (2006).
34. Aubin, I., Messier, C. & Bouchard, A. Can plantations develop understory biological and physical attributes of naturally regenerated forests? Biol. Conserv. 141, 2461-2476, 10. 1016/j. biocon. 2008. 07. 007 (2008).
35. Hansen, A. J., Spies, T. A., Swanson, F. J. & Ohmann, J. L. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. BioScience 41, 382-392 (1991).
36. MAFF. MAFF's biodiversity strategy. 40 (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesJapan, , Tokyo, 2007).
37. Prugh, L. R., Hodges, K. E., Sinclair, A. R. E. & Brashares, J. S. Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 20770-20775, 10. 1073/pnas. 0806080105 (2008).
38. Franklin, J. F. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 349-350, 10. 1073/pnas. 0812016105 (2009).
39. Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570-574, 10. 1126/science. 1111772 (2005). (Pubitemid 41033633)
40. Taki, H. et al. Effects of reforestation age on moth assemblages in plantations and naturally regenerated forests. Insect Conservation and Diversity 3, 257-265 (2010).
41. Namai, H. Pollination biology and reproductive ecology for improving genetics and breeding of common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum (2).Fagopyrum 10, 35-46 (1990).
42. Bjorkman, T. Role of honey bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in the pollination of buckwheat in eastern North America. J. Econ. Entomol. 88, 1739-1745 (1995). (Pubitemid 3010330)
43. Cawoy, V. et al. Morph differences and honeybeemorph preference in the distylous species Fagopyrum esculentum Moench. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167, 853-861 (2006). (Pubitemid 44306857)
44. Dyer, F. C. & Seeley, T. D. Dance dialects and foraging range in three Asian honey bee species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 28, 227-233 (1991).
45. Lunn, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N. & Spiegelhalter, D. WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 325-337 (2000).
46. Sturtz, S., Ligges, U. & Gelman, A. R2WinBUGS: a package for runningWinBUGS from R. Journal of Statistical Software 12, 1-16 (2005).
47. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Ver. 2. 10. 1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www. R-project. org/, 2009).
48. Lichstein, J. W., Simons, T. R., Shriner, S. A. & Franzreb, K. E. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecological Monographs 72, 445-463 (2002). (Pubitemid 36219454)
49. Diggle, P. J., Tawn, J. A. & Moyeed, R. A. Model-based geostatistics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 47, 299-350 (1998).
50. Thomas, A., Best, N., Lunn, D., Arnold, R. & Spiegelhalter, D. GeoBUGS user manual. Ver. 1. 2. (2004).
51. McCarthy, M. A. Bayesian methods for ecology. (CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007).
52. Kéry, M. Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: a Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA, mixed models and related analyses. (Academic Press, 2010).