Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 195, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1022-1032

  Vignon, Philippe ^a,b,c   Repessé, Xavier ^d   Begot, Emmanuelle ^a,b   Léger, Julie ^e   Jacob, Christophe ^f   Bouferrache, Koceila ^g   Slama, Michel ^h   Prat, Gwenaël ^f   Vieillard Baron, Antoine ^d,i  

^a DUPUYTREN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LIMOGES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

^d HÔPITAL AMBROISE PARÉ   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^f BREST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g FOCH HOSPITAL   (France)

^h AMIENS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁱ LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Doppler ultrasonography; Echocardiography; Fluid therapy; Hemodynamic

Indexed keywords

CATECHOLAMINE; HYPERTENSIVE AGENT; LACTIC ACID;

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD FLOW; CARDIOVASCULAR RESPONSE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPH; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE OUTFLOW TRACT; HEART RATE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK; INFERIOR CAVA VEIN; ISCHEMIA; LACTATE BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE PRESSURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEPTIC SHOCK; SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; SUPERIOR CAVA VEIN; SUPERIOR VENA CAVA DIAMETER; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VEIN DIAMETER; VENTILATED PATIENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FLUID THERAPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VENA CAVA, INFERIOR; VENA CAVA, SUPERIOR;

EID: 85018644430     PISSN: 1073449X     EISSN: 15354970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0844OC     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul J.L., Pettila V., Wilkman E, Molnar Z, Della Rocca G, Aldecoa C, Artigas A., Jog S, et al.; FENICE Investigators; ESICM Trial Group. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study. A global inception cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1529-1537.
2. Boulain T, Boisrame-Helms J, Ehrmann S., Lascarrou JB, Bouglé A, Chiche A, Lakhal K, Gaudry S, Perbet S, Desachy A, et al. Volume expansion in the first 4 days of shock: a prospective multicentre study in 19 French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 248-256.
3. Perner A, Vieillard-Baron A, Bakker J. Fluid resuscitation in ICU patients: quo vadis? Intensive Care Med 2015; 41:1667-1669.
4. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard G.R., Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2564-2575.
5. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park P.K., Bartlett RH; NIH NHLBI ARDS Network. Review of a large clinical series: association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury. A retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24:35-46.
6. Murphy CV, Schramm GE, Doherty J.A., Reichley RM, Gajic O, Afessa B, Micek S.T., Kollef MH. The importance of fluid management in acute lung injury secondary to septic shock. Chest 2009; 136:102-109.
7. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada T.A., Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:259-265.
8. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D., Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky J.E., Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, et al; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:165-228.
9. Michard F, Teboul JL Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002; 121:2000-2008.
10. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1774-1781.
11. Bendjelid K, Romand JA Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29:352-360.
12. Mayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P., Feller-Kopman D, Harrod C, Kaplan A., Oropello J, Vieillard-Baron A, Axler O, Lichtenstein D., et al. American College of Chest Physicians/La SRLF. Statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest 2009; 135: 1050-1060.
13. Slama M, Maizel J. Assessment of fluid requirements: fluid responsiveness. In: De Backer D, Cholley BP, Slama M, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P, editors. Hemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill. Berlin: Springer; 2011. pp. 61-70.
14. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L., Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F., Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A., et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:681-685.
15. Begot E, Repessé X, Prat G, Charron C, Jacob C, Bouferache K, Maizel J, Slama M, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P. Évaluation comparative des indices échocardiographiques de précharge-dépendance chez les patients en défaillance circulatoire: étude prospective multicentrique HEMOPRED [abstract]. Anesth Réanim 2015; 1:A139.
16. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R., Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R., Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul J.L., et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40: 1795-1815.
17. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson B.T., Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L., Slutsky AS; ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012; 307: 2526-2533.
18. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1726-1734.
19. Expert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40:654-666.
20. Vieillard-Baron A., Chergui K, Rabiller A., Peyrouset O, Page B, Jardin F. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1734-1739.
21. Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C., Hayon J, Ricome JL, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1740-1746.
22. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I., Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119:867-873.
23. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux R.B., Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellika PA, Picard M.H., Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, et al Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28:1-39.
24. Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography: a critical appraisal. Herz 1986; 11:258-268.
25. Cavallaro F, Sandroni C, Marano C., La Torre G, Mannocci A, De Waure C, Bello G, Maviglia R., Antonelli M. Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Intensive Care Med 2010; 36:1475-1483.
26. Cherpanath TG, Hirsch A, Geerts B.F., Lagrand WK, Leeflang MM, Schultz MJ, Groeneveld AB Predicting fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 clinical trials. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:981-991.
27. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1935-1947.
28. Jabot J, Teboul JL, Richard C, Monnet X. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: importance of the postural change. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35:85-90.
29. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D., Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky M.R., Teboul JL. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407.
30. Aya HD, Ster IC, Fletcher N, Grounds R.M., Rhodes A., Cecconi M. Pharmacodynamic analysis of a fluid challenge. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:880-891.
31. Fermanian J. Measurement of agreement between 2 judges: qualitative cases [in French]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1984; 32:140-147.
32. Bland JM, Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
33. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated ROC curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44:837-845.
34. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N., Lorne E, Hijazi M, Zogheib E., Tinturier F, Slama M, Dupont H. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsiveness in patients with intraabdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1824-1829.
35. Vignon P, Allot V, Lesage J., Martaillé JF, Aldigier JC, François B, Gastinne H. Diagnosis of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in the setting of acute changes in loading conditions. Crit Care 2007; 11:R43.
36. Amiel JB, Grümann A, Lhéritier G, Clavel M., François B, Pichon N., Dugard A, Marin B, Vignon P. Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using an ultrasonic stethoscope in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012; 16:R29.
37. Jardin F. Cyclic changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1047-1050.
38. Charbonneau H, Riu B, Faron M., Mari A, Kurrek MM, Ruiz J, Geeraerts T., Fourcade O, Genestal M, Silva S. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters. Crit Care 2014; 18:473.
39. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin J.P., Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology 2011; 115:231-241.
40. Cannesson M. The "grey zone" or how to avoid the binary constraint of decision-making. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62:1139-1142.
41. Vincent JL, Weil MH Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med 2006; 34: 1333-1337.
42. Vignon P, Slama M. Diagnosing the mechanisms of circulatory failure. In: De Backer D, Cholley BP, Slama M, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P, editors. Hemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011. p. 99-107.
43. Klijn E, van Velzen MHN, Lima AP, Bakker J, van Bommel J, Groeneveld AB. Tissue perfusion and oxygenation to monitor fluid responsiveness in critically ill, septic patients after initial resuscitation: a prospective observational study. J Clin Monit Comput 2015; 29:707-712.
44. De Backer D., Heenen S, Piagnerelli M., Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523.
45. Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V., Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P., Annat G, Bendjelid K, Viale JP Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:163-171.
46. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D., Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y., Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:134-138.
47. Wetterslev M, Møller-Sørensen H, Johansen RR, Perner A. Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42:1223-1233.