A mass appraisal model based on market segment parameters

Buildings

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Ciuna, Marina ^a   Milazzo, Laura ^a   Salvo, Francesca ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Automatic valuation method; Market segment; Mass appraisal; Real estate

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018601019     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20755309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/buildings7020034     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ciuna, M.; Simonotti, M. Linee Guida per la rilevazione dei dati del mercato immobiliare. Seconda parte. GEOCENTRO 2011, 16, 88-97.
2. Simonotti, M.; Salvo, F.; Ciuna, M.; De Ruggiero, M. Measurements of Rationality for a Scientific Approach to the Market-Oriented Methods. J. Real Estate Lit. 2016, 24, 403-427.
3. International Valuation Standards Council. Guidance Note n. 13 Mass Appraisal for Property Taxation; IVSC: London, UK, 2007.
4. Appraisal Standards Board. Standard 6: Mass Appraisal, Development and Reporting. In Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) 2008-2009; Appraisal Standards Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
5. Ciuna, M.; Salvo, F.; Simonotti, M. Multilevel Methodology Approach for the Construction of Real Estate Monthly Index Numbers. J. Real Estate Lit. 2014, 22, 281-302.
6. Arribas, I.; García, F.; Guijarro, F.; Olive, R.J.; Tamošiūniene, R. Mass appraisal of residential real estate using˙ multilevel modelling. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag.2016,20, 77-87.
7. Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M.; Amiri, M.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Hooshmand, R.; Antucheviče, J. Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2017, 18, 1-19.
8. Aghdaie, M.H.; Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.; Zavadskas, E.K. Market segment evaluation and selection based on application of Fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methods. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2013, 14, 213-233.
9. Shenkel, W.; Eidson, A. Comparable sales retrieval systems. Apprais. J. 1971, 4, 540-544.
10. Dilmore, G. Appraising houses. Real Estate Apprais. 1974, 7-8, 21-32.
11. Todora, J.; Whiterell, D. Automating the sales comparison approach. Assess. J. 2002, 1-2, 25-33.
12. Borst, R.; McCluskey, W. The modified comparable sales method as the basis for a property tax valuations system and its relationship and comparison to spatially autoregressive valuation models. In Mass Appraisal Methods: An International Perspective for Property Valuers; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Chicester, UK, 2008; pp. 49-69.
13. Fotheringham, A.S.; Brunsdon, C.; Charlton, M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2002; p. 269.
14. McMillen, D.P.; Redfearn, C.L. Estimation and hypothesis testing for nonparametric hedonic house price functions. J. Reg. Sci. 2010, 50, 712-733.
15. Brunsdon, C.; Fotheringham, A.S.; Charlton, M.E. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr. Anal. 1996, 28, 281-298.
16. Berry, B.; Bednarz, R.S. A Hedonic Model of Prices and Assessments for Single Family Homes: Does the Assessor Follow the Market or the Market Follow the Assessor? Land Econ. 1975, 51, 21-40.
17. Fik, T.; Ling, D.; Mulligan, G. Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: A variable interaction approach. Real Estate Econ. 2003, 31, 623-646.
18. Zhang, R.; Du, Q.; Geng, J.; Liu, B.; Huang, Y. An improved spatial error model for the mass appraisal of commercial real estate based on spatial analysis: Shenzhen as a case study. Habitat Int. 2015, 46, 196-205.
19. Dubin, R. Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1998, 70, 466-474.
20. O'Connor, P. Automated valuation models by model-building practitioners: Testing hybrid model structure and GIS location adjustments. J. Prop. Tax Assess. Adm. 2008, 5, 5-24.
21. d'Amato, M. A location value response surface model for mass appraising: An "iterative" location adjustment factor in Bari, Italy. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2010, 14, 231-244.
22. Taltavull, P. Book review. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2009, 13, 359-364.
23. Goodman, A.; Thibodeau, T. Housing market segmentation. J. Hous. Econ. 1998, 7, 121-143.
24. Goodman, A.; Thibodeau, T. Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. J. Hous. Econ. 2003, 12, 181-201.
25. Goodman, A.; Thibodeau, T. The spatial proximity of metropolitan area housing submarkets. Real Estate Econ. 2007, 35, 209-232.
26. Bourassa, S.; Cantoni, E.; Hoesli, M. Spatial dependence, housing sub-markets, and house price predictions. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2007, 35, 143-160.
27. Quintos, C. Spatial Weight Matrices and Their Use As Baseline Values and Location-Adjustment Factors in Property Assessment Models. Cityscape 2013, 15, 295-306.
28. Conway, D.; Li, C.Q.; Wolch, J.; Kahle, C.; Jerrett, M. A Spatial Autocorrelation Approach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values. J. Real Estate Financ. Econ. 2010, 41, 150-169.
29. d'Amato, M. Location Value Response Model as Automated Valuation Methodology a Case in Bari. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 181-190.
30. Del Giudice, V.; De Paola, P. Spatial Analysis of Residential Real Estate Market with Geoadditive Models. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 155-162.
31. Ciuna, M.; Salvo, F.; Simonotti, M. An Estimative Model of Automated Valuation Methods in Italy. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 85-112.
32. Ciuna, M.; De Ruggiero, M.; Salvo, F.; Simonotti, M. Automatic Research of the Capitalization Rate for the Residential Automated Valuation: An Experimental Study in Cosenza (Italy). In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 361-380.
33. Ciuna, M.; De Ruggiero, M.; Salvo, F.; Simonotti, M. Automated Procedure Based on Market Comparison Approach in Italy. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 381-400.
34. Ciuna, M.; Salvo, F.; Simonotti, M. The Multilevel Model in Computer-Generated Appraisal: A case in Palermo. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 225-261.
35. d'Amato, M.; Renigier-Bilozor, M. An Application of RST as Automated Valuation Methodology to Commercial Properties. A Casein Bari. In Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling; Kauko, T., d'Amato, M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 86, pp. 279-303.
36. International Valuation Standards Committee. International Valuation Standards; IVSC: London, UK, 2017.
37. Ciuna, M.; Salvo, F.; De Ruggiero, M. Property Prices Index Numbers and Derived Indices. Prop. Manag. 2014, 32, 139-153.