Automated procedures based on market comparison approach in Italy

Studies in Systems, Decision and Control

Volumn 86, Issue , 2017, Pages 381-400

  Ciuna, Marina ^a   De Ruggiero, Manuela ^b   Salvo, Francesca ^b   Simonotti, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALABRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Automated valuation models; GIS; Market comparison approach; Model builder

Indexed keywords

EID: 85018618654     PISSN: 21984182     EISSN: 21984190     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Borst, R., & McCluskey, W. (2008). The modified comparable sales method as the basis for a property tax valuations system and its relationship and comparison to spatially autoregressive valuation models. In T. Kauko, & M. d’Amato (Eds.), Mass appraisal methods: An international perspective for property valuers (pp. 49–69). Chicester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
2. Borst, R. A., Des Rosiers, F., Renigier, M., Kauko, T., & d’Amato, M. (2008). Technical comparison of the methods including formal testing accuracy and other modelling performance using own data sets and multiple regression analysis. In T. Kauko, & M. d’Amato (Eds.), Mass appraisal an international perspective for property valuers. Wiley Blackwell.
3. Bourassa, S., Cantoni, E., & Hoesli, M. (2007). Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house price predictions. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35, 143–160.
4. Bourassa, S., Cantoni, E., & Hoesli, M. (2010). Predicting house prices with spatial dependence: A comparison of alternative methods. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32, 139–159.
5. Bourassa, S., Cantoni, E., & Hoesli, M. (2013). Robust repeat sales indexes. Real Estate Economics, 41(3), 517–541.
6. Case, B., Clapp, J., Dubin, R., & Rodriguez, M. (2004). Modeling spatial and temporal house price patterns: A comparison of four models. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29, 167–191.
7. Ciuna, M., & Simonotti, M. (2014). Real estate surfaces appraisal. AESTIMUM, 64, 1–13 (Giugno).
8. Ciuna, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2014a). The expertise in the real estate appraisal in Italy. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference of Civil Engineering (ECCIE ‘14). Mathematics and Computers in Science and Engineering Series (pp. 120–129), North Atlantic University Union. ISSN:2227-4588, Firenze, 22/24 November 2014.
9. Ciuna, M., Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2014b). Property prices index numbers and derived indices. Property Management, 32 (2), 139–153. DOI(Permanent URL):10.1108/PM-03-2013-0021
10. Ciuna, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2014c). Multilevel methodology approach for the construction of real estate monthly index numbers. Journal of Real Estate Literature: 2014, 22 (2), 281–302.
11. Colwell, P. F., Cannaday, R. E., & Wu, C. (1983). The analytical foundations of adjustment grid methods. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 11(1), 11–29.
12. d’Amato M. (2004). A Comparison Between RST and MRA for Mass Appraisal Purposes. A Case in Bari, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Vol.8, pp. 205–217.
13. d’Amato, M. (2008). Rough set theory as property valuation methodology: The whole story. In T. Kauko, & M. d’Amato (Eds.), Mass appraisal an international perspective for property valuers (Chap. 11, pp. 220–258). Wiley Blackwell.
14. d’Amato, M. (2010). A location value response surface model for mass appraising: An “iterative” location adjustment factor in Bari, Italy. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 14, 231–244.
15. d’Amato, M. (2015). Income approach and property market cycle. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 29(3), 207–219.
16. d’Amato, M. (2015a). Stima del valore di trasformazione utilizzando la funzione di stima. Il MCA a tabella dei dati ridotta, Territorio Italia, pp. 1–12.
17. d’Amato, M. (2015b). MCA a Tabella dei Dati Ridotta e Sistema Integrativo di Stima. Un Secondo Caso a Bari, Territorio Italia, pp. 49–60.
18. d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (2008). Property market classification and mass appraisal methodology. In T. Kauko, & M. d’Amato (Eds.), Mass appraisal an international perspective for property valuers (Chap. 13, pp. 280–303). Wiley Blackwell.
19. d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (2012). Sustainability and risk premium estimation in property valuation and assessment of worth. Building Research and Information, 40(2), 174–185 (March–April 2012).
20. d’Amato, M., & Siniak, N. (2008). Using fuzzy numbers in mass appraisal: The case of belorussian property market. In T. Kauko, & M. d’Amato (Eds.), Mass appraisal an international perspective for property valuers (Chap. 5, pp. 91–107). Wiley Blackwell.
21. Detweiler, J., & R. Radigan. (1996). Computer-assisted real estate appraisal. Appraisal Journal, January, 91–101.
22. Detweiler, J., & Radigan, R. (1999). Computer-assisted real estate appraisal: A tool for the practicing appraiser. Appraisal Journal, July, 280–286.
23. Dilmore, G. (1974). Appraising houses. Real Estate Appraiser July–August: 21–32.
24. Dubin, R. (1998). Estimation of regression coefficients in the presence of spatially autocorrelated error terms. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 466–474.
25. Fik, T., Ling, D., & Mulligan, G. (2003). Modeling spatial variation in housing prices: A variable interaction approach. Real Estate Economics, 31(4), 623–646.
26. Gau, G. W., Lai, T.-Y., & Wang, K. (1992). Optimal comparable selection and weighting in real property valuation: An extension. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 20(1), 107–124.
27. Gau, G. W., Lai, T.-Y., & Wang, K. (1994). A further discussion of optimal comparable selection and weighting, and a response to green. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban EconomicsAssociation, 22(4), 655–663.
28. Goodman, A., & Thibodeau, T. (1998). Housing market segmentation. Journal of Housing Economics, 7, 121–143.
29. Goodman, A., & Thibodeau, T. (2003). Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(3), 181–201.
30. Goodman, A., & Thibodeau, T. (2007). The spatial proximity of metropolitan area housing submarkets. Real Estate Economics, 35, 209–232.
31. Graaskamp, J., & Robbins, M. (1987). Business 868 lecture notes. University of Wisconsin– Madison.
32. Isakson, H. R. (1986). The nearest neighbors appraisal technique: An alternative to the adjustment grid methods. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 14(2), 274–286.
33. Isakson, H. R. (1988). Valuation analysis of commercial real estate using the nearest neighbors appraisal technique. Growth and Change, 19(2), 11–24.
34. Kauko, T., & d’Amato, M. (2011). Neighbourhood effect, international encyclopedia of housing and home. Elsevier Publisher.
35. Manaster, M. S. (1988). Sales comparison approach: A comparative analysis of three appraisal technique. Growth and Change, 19(2), 11–24.
36. Manaster, M. S. (1991). Sales comparison approach: A comparative analysis of three appraisal reports on the same property. The Real Estate Appraiser, May, 12–26.
37. O’Connor, P. (2008). Automated valuation models by model-building practitioners: Testing hybrid model structure and GIS location adjustments. Journal of Property Tax Assessment and Administration, 5(2), 5–24.
38. Pace, R., & Gilley, O. (1997). Using the spatial configuration of data to improve estimation. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 14, 333–340.
39. Pace, R., & Gilley, O. (1998). Generalizing the OLS and grid estimators. Real Estate Economics, 1, 331–346.
40. Renigier-Biłozor, M., Dawidowicz, A., & Radzewicz, A. (2014a). An algorithm for the purposes of determining the real estate markets efficiency in land administration system. Public Survey Review, 46(336), 189–204.
41. Renigier-Biłozor, M., Wiśniewski, R., Biłozor, A., & Kaklauskas, A. (2014b). Rating methodology for real estate markets—Poland case study. Pub. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18(2), 198–212. ISNN:1648-715X.
42. Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2011). Misure di similarità negli Adjustment Grid Methods. AESTIMUM, 58, 47–58. ISSN:1592-6117.
43. Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2013). Market comparison approach between tradition and innovation. A simplifying approach. AESTIMUM, 62, 585–594. ISSN:1592-6117.
44. Salvo, F., Ciuna, M., & d’Amato, M. (2013). The appraisal smoothing in the real estate idices. In (a cura di): Maria Crescimanno, Leonardo Casini and Antonino Galati, Dynamisc of land values agricultural policies (pp. 99–111), Bologna: Medimond Monduzzi Editore International Proceeding Division. ISBN:978-88-7587-690-6, Palermo, 22–23/11/2012.
45. Salvo, F., Simonotti, M., Ciuna, M., & De Ruggiero, M. (in print). Measurements of rationality for a scientific approach to the Market Oriented Methods. Journal of Real Estate Literature. ISSN:0927–7544.
46. Simonotti, M. (2006). Metodi di stima immobiliare (pp. 177–246). Palermo: Dario Flaccovio Editore.
47. Vandell, K. D. (1991). Optimal comparable selection and weighting in real property valuation. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, 19(2), 213–239.