Synergistic use of LiDAR and APEX hyperspectral data for high-resolution urban land cover mapping

Remote Sensing

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2016, Pages

  Priem, Frederik ^a   Canters, Frank ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

APEX; Hyperspectral remote sensing; Land cover; LiDAR; Post classification; Shadow compensation; Shadow detection; Support vector machines; Urban

Indexed keywords

ITERATIVE METHODS; LUMINANCE; MAPPING; OPTICAL RADAR; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTROSCOPY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

APEX; HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING; LAND COVER; POST CLASSIFICATION; SHADOW COMPENSATIONS; SHADOW DETECTIONS; URBAN;

PHOTOMAPPING;

EID: 85017644326     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs8100787     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Rashed, T.; Jürgens, C. Remote Sensing of Urban and Suburban Areas; Springer: London, UK, 2010
2. Ben-Dor, E. Imaging spectrometry for urban applications. In Imaging Spectrometry: Basic Principles and Prospective Applications; Van Der Meer, F.D., De Jong, S.M., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherland, 2001; pp. 243-281
3. Roberts, D.A.; Herold, M. Imaging spectroscopy of urban materials. In Infrared Spectroscopy in Geochemistry, Exploration and Remote Sensing; King, P., Ramsey, M.S., Swayze, G., Eds.; Mineral Association of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2004; pp. 155-181
4. Xian, G.Z. Remote Sensing Applications for the Urban Environment; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015
5. Ben-Dor, E. Quantitative Remote Sensing of Soil Properties. Adv. Agron. 2002, 75, 173-243
6. Wu, C. Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 93, 480-492
7. Deng, Y.; Wu, C.; Li, M.; Chen, R. RNDSI: A ratio normalized difference soil index for remote sensing of urban/suburban environments. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2015, 39, 40-48
8. Herold, M.; Schiefer, S.; Hostert, P.; Roberts, D.A. Applying imaging spectrometry in urban areas. In Urban Remote Sensing; Weng, Q., Quattrochi, D.A., Eds.; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; pp. 137-161
9. Yan, W.Y.; Shaker, A.; El-Ashmawy, N. Urban land cover classification using airborne LiDAR data: A review. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 158, 295-310
10. Raychaudhuri, B. Imaging spectroscopy: Origin and future trends. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2016, 51, 23-35
11. Hardin, P.; Hardin, A. Hyperspectral remote sensing of urban areas. Geogr. Compass 2013, 1, 7-21
12. Brubaker, K.M.; Myers, W.L.; Drohan, P.J.; Miller, D.A.; Boyer, E.W. The Use of LiDAR Terrain data in characterizing surface roughness and microtopography. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2013, 2013, 1-13
13. Song, J.; Han, S.; Yu, K.; Kim, Y. Assessing the possibility of land-cover classification using LiDAR intensity data. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2002, 34, 259-262
14. Mallet, C.; Bretar, F.; Roux, M.; Soergel, U.; Heipke, C. Relevance assessment of full-waveform LiDAR data for urban area classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66, S71-S84
15. Mallet, C.; Bretar, F. Full-waveform topographic LiDAR: State-of-the-art. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009, 64, 1-16
16. Khodadadzadeh, M.; Member, S.; Li, J.; Prasad, S.; Member, S. Fusion of hyperspectral and LiDAR remote sensing data using multiple feature learning. J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2015, 8, 1-13
17. Ghamisi, P.; Benediktsson, J.A.; Phinn, S. Land-cover classification using both hyperspectral and LiDAR data. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 2015, 6, 189-215
18. Heiden, U.; Heldens,W.; Roessner, S.; Segl, K.; Esch, T.; Mueller, A. Urban structure type characterization using hyperspectral remote sensing and height information. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 105, 361-375
19. Brook, A.; Ben-Dor, E.; Richter, R. Modelling and monitoring urban built environment via multi-source integrated and fused remote sensing data. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 2011, 9832, 1-31
20. Alonzo, M.; Bookhagen, B.; Roberts, D.A. Urban tree species mapping using hyperspectral and LiDAR data fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 148, 70-83
21. Huang, X.; Zhang, L.; Gong, W. Information fusion of aerial images and LiDAR data in urban areas: Vector-stacking, re-classification and post-processing approaches. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 69-84
22. Gamba, P. Image and data fusion in remote sensing of urban areas: Status issues and research trends. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 2013, 5, 2-12
23. Gamba, P.; Lisini, G.; Tomas, L.; Almeida, C.; Fonseca, L. Joint VHR-LIDAR classification framework in urban areas using a priori knowledge and post processing shape optimization. In Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE), Munich, Germany, 11-13 April 2011; pp. 93-96
24. Van de Voorde, T.; De Genst, W.; Canters, F. Improving pixel-based VHR land-cover classifications of urban areas with post-classification techniques. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2007, 73, 1017-1027
25. Dare, P.M. Shadow Analysis in High-Resolution Satellite Imagery of Urban Areas. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2005, 71, 169-177
26. Arévalo, V.; González, J.; Ambrosio, G. Shadow detection in colour high-resolution satellite images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 1945-1963
27. Adler-golden, S.M.; Levine, R.Y.; Matthew, M.W.; Richtsmeier, S.C.; Bernstein, L.S.; Gruninger, J.; Felde, G.; Hoke, M.; Anderson, G.; Ratkowski, A. Shadow-Insensitive material detection/classification with atmospherically corrected hyperspectral imagery. Proc. SPIE 2001
28. Adeline, K.R.M.; Chen, M.; Briottet, X.; Pang, S.K.; Paparoditis, N. Shadow detection in very high spatial resolution aerial images: A comparative study. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2013, 80, 21-38
29. Shahtahmassebi, A.; Yang, N.; Wang, K.; Moore, N.; Shen, Z. Review of shadow detection and de-shadowing methods in remote sensing. Chinese Geogr. Sci. 2013, 23, 403-420
30. Tolt, G.; Shimoni, M.; Ahlberg, J. A shadow detection method for remote sensing images using VHR hyperspectral and LiDAR data. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24-29 July 2011; pp. 4423-4426
31. Ratti, C.; Richens, P. Raster analysis of urban form. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2004, 31, 297-309
32. Richens, P. Image processing for urban scale environmental modelling. In Proceedings of the 5th Intemational IBPSA Conference: Building Simulation 97, Prague, Czech Republic, 1 Janunary 1997
33. Morello, E.; Ratti, C. Sunscapes: "Solar envelopes" and the analysis of urban DEMs. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2009, 33, 26-34
34. Tsai, V.J.D. A comparative study on shadow compensation of color aerial images in invariant color models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 1661-1671
35. Lorenzi, L.; Melgani, F.; Mercier, G. A complete processing chain for shadow detection and reconstruction in VHR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 3440-3452
36. Ashton, E.; Wemett, B.; Leathers, R.; Downes, T. A novel method for illumination suppression in hyperspectral images. Proc. SPIE 2008
37. Friman, O.; Tolt, G.; Ahlberg, J. Illumination and shadow compensation of hyperspectral images using a digital surface model and non-linear least squares estimation. Proc. SPIE 2011
38. Wu, S.T.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Chen, C.T.; Chen, J.C. A Comparison of 4 shadow compensation techniques for land cover classification of shaded areas from high radiometric resolution aerial images. Can. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 40, 315-326
39. Itten, K.I.; Dell'Endice, F.; Hueni, A.; Kneubühler, M.; Schläpfer, D.; Odermatt, D.; Seidel, F.; Huber, S.; Schopfer, J.; Kellenberger, T.; et al. APEX-the hyperspectral ESA airborne prism experiment. Sensors 2008, 8, 6235-6259
40. Schaepman, M.E.; Jehle, M.; Hueni, A.; D'Odorico, P.; Damm, A.; Weyermann, J.; Schneider, F.D.; Laurent, V.; Popp, C.; Seidel, F.C.; et al. Advanced radiometry measurements and earth science applications with the Airborne Prism Experiment (APEX). Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 158, 207-219
41. De Haan, J.F.; Hovenier, J.W.; Kokke, J.M.M.; van Stokkom, H.T.C. Removal of atmospheric influences on satellite-borne imagery: A radiative transfer approach. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 37, 1-21
42. Sterckx, S.; Vreys, K.; Biesemans, J.; Iordache, M.D.; Bertels, L.; Meuleman, K. Atmospheric correction of APEX hyperspectral data. Misc. Geogr. 2016, 20, 16-20
43. Vreys, K.; Iordache, M.-D.; Bomans, B.; Meuleman, K. Data acquisition with the APEX hyperspectral sensor. Misc. Geogr. 2016, 20, 5-10
44. Vreys, K.; Iordache, M.-D.; Biesemans, J.; Meuleman, K. Geometric correction of APEX hyperspectral data. Misc. Geogr. 2016, 20, 11-15
45. Cariou, C.; Chehdi, K.; Le Moan, S. BandClust: An unsupervised band reduction method for hyperspectral remote sensing. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 8, 565-569
46. Demarchi, L.; Canters, F.; Cariou, C.; Licciardi, G.; Chan, J.C.W. Assessing the performance of two unsupervised dimensionality reduction techniques on hyperspectral APEX data for high resolution urban land-cover mapping. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 87, 166-179
47. Chi, M.; Feng, R.; Bruzzone, L. Classification of hyperspectral remote-sensing data with primal SVM for small-sized training dataset problem. Adv. Sp. Res. 2008, 41, 1793-1799
48. Mammone, A.; Turchi, M.; Cristianini, N. Support vector machines. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2009, 1, 283-289
49. Mountrakis, G.; Im, J.; Ogole, C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2011, 66, 247-259
50. Van der Linden, S.; Rabe, A.; Held, M.; Jakimow, B.; Leitão, P.J.; Okujeni, A.; Schwieder, M.; Suess, S.; Hostert, P. The EnMAP-box-A toolbox and application programming interface for EnMAP data processing. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 11249-11266
51. Chang, C.-C.; Lin, C.J. Libsvm. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2011, 2, 1-27
52. Congalton, R.G.; Green, K. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, 2nd ed.; CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009