Designing social living labs in urban research

Info

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 53-66

  Franz, Yvonne ^a  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Contextualised living methods; Living lab; Social living lab; Spaces of encounter; Urban research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930154561     PISSN: 14636697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/info-01-2015-0008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Almirall, E. and Wareham, J. (2008), “Living labs and open innovation: roles and applicability”, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 21-46.
2. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. and Ståhlbröst, A. (2009), “Living lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation”, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 356-370.
3. Edwards-Schachter, M.E., Matti, C.E. and Alcántara, E. (2012), “Fostering quality of life through social innovation: a living lab methodology study case”, Review of Policy Research, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 672-692.
4. ENoLL (2014), available at: www.openlivinglabs.eu/ (accessed 30 December 2014).
5. Feurstein, K. and Schumacher, J. (2008), “Best practice report”, CoreLabs deliverable D2.1b, available at: www.corelabs.eu
6. Følstad, A. (2008), “Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review”, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 99-131.
7. Frissen, V. and Van Lieshout, M. (2002), “Living labs – an elaboration”, working paper, TNO, Delft.
8. Higgins, A. and Klein, S. (2011), “Introduction to the living lab approach”, in Tan, Y.H., Björn-Andersen, H., Klein, S. and Rukanova, B. (Eds), Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 31-36.
9. Karvonen, A. and Van Heur, B. (2014), “Urban laboratories: experiments in reworking cities”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 379-392.
10. Katzky, B. and Klein, S. (2008), “Editorial introduction: special issue on living labs”, The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 2-6.
11. Lokale Lente (2014), “Pioniers in de stad: Wijkondernemers delen kennis en praktijk”, Trancity/Valiz.
12. Markopoulos, P. and Rauterberg, G.W.M. (2000), “Living lab: a white paper”, IPO Annual Progress Report.
13. Mulder, I. (2012), “Living labbing the rotterdam way: co-creation as an enabler for Urban innovation”, Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 39-43.
14. Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L. and Loorbach, D. (2013), “Urban Transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 111-122.
15. Noll, M. (2011), “Urban Europe – europäische Städte der Zukunft”, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, Conturen, 2. 2011, pp. 83-92.
16. Pascu, C. and Van Lieshout, M. (2009), “User-led, citizen innovation at the interfacce of services”, Info – The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 82-96.
17. Putters, K. (2013), De Verzorgingsstad: Tussen Verzorgingsstaat en Participatiesamenleving, Wibautlezing, Centrum voor lokaal bestuur.
18. Russo-Spena, T. and Mele, C. (2012), “Five co-s in innovating: a practice-based view”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 527-553.
19. Schuurman, D. (2015), “Bridging the gap between open and user innovation? Exploring the value of living labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation”, Dissertation at Ghent University and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB).
20. SmartIES (2014), “A transnational Nordic smart city living lab pilot”, The Living Lab Methodology Handbook, available at: www.ltu.se/cms_fs/1.101555!/file/LivingLabsMethodologyBook_web.pdf, (accessed 30 December 2014).
21. Somerville, M.M. and Nino, M. (2007), “Collaborative co-design: a user-centric approach for advancement of organizational learning”, Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 180-188.
22. UK Cabinet Office (2010), “Building the big society”, Policy Paper, available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78979/building-big-society_0.pdf (accessed 30 December 2014).
23. Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S. and Westerlund, M. (2013), “Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: towards a conceptual framework”, Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 6-15.
24. Askins, K. and Pain, R. (2011), “Contact zones: participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 803-821.
25. Feurstein, K., Hesmer, A., Hribernik, K.A., Thoben, K.D. and Schumacher, J. (2008), “Living labs: a new development strategy”, in Schumacher, J. and Nijtamo, V.P. (Eds), European Living Labs – A New Approach for Human CentricRegional Innovation, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1-14.