IDeALL: Investigating design-for-all and living-lab methods for engaging users in value co-creation

2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering Responsible Innovation in Products and Services, ICE 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Mangyoku, Mikael ^a   Verilhac, Isabelle ^a   Pallot, Marc ^a   Aragall, Francesc ^b   Serra, Artur ^c   Sanchez, Laia ^c   Vuontisjarvi, Hanna Riina ^d  

^a Cité du Design   (France)

^b Design for All Foundation   (Spain)

^c Lapin Yliopisto University of Lapland ^*  (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

co creation; design for all; design method; living lab; open innovation ecosystem; user centred design

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECOSYSTEMS;

CO-CREATION; DESIGN-FOR-ALL; DESIGN-METHOD; LIVING-LAB; OPEN-INNOVATION-ECOSYSTEM; USER-CENTRED-DESIGN;

DESIGN;

EID: 84906673838     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2014.6871564     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Curley, M. (2013). "Open Innovation 2.0: Evolution or Revolution?". The Ispim Magazine, Issue 1/2013, retrieved in http://magazine.ispim.org/2013/01/open-innovation-2-0-evolution-orrevolution
2. Schrage, M. and Ubiquity staff (2004). "Michael Schrage on Innovation". Ubiquity 2004, December, Article 3. DOI=10.1145/1040564. 1040565 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1040564.1040565
3. Erkinheimo-Mennander, P., Harjanne, K. (2011). "The Usage and the Benefits of Internal and External Crowdsourcing", Open Innovation Yearbook 2011
4. Barbier, J. et al. (2007). "Improving innovation productivity in the consumer packaged goods industry", [Online], Available at: http://www.cisco.com [Accessed 13 April 2010].
5. Ribiere, M. R. & Tuggle, F. D. (2010). "Fostering Innovation with KM 2.0", The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 90-101.
6. Curley, M. & Salmelin, B. (2013). "Open Innovation 2.0: A New Paradigm", OISPG White Paper.
7. Pallot, M. (2009). "The Living Lab Approach: A User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem". Webergence Blog Retrieved January 2011 http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/715404
8. Pallot, M., Pawar, K. S. (2012). "A Holistic Model of User Experience for Living Lab Experiential Design ", Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE'2012 "Innovation by Collaboration and Entrepreneurial Partnerships", Munich, Germany, 18-20 June 2012
9. Vérilhac, I. (2011). LUPI® - Innovative Uses and Practices Lab, core of the Design Creative City Living Lab. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2011 "Innovating Products and Services for Collaborative Networks", Aachen, Germany, June 2011
10. Vérilhac, I., Pallot, M., Aragall, F. (2012) IDeALL: Exploring the Way to Integrate Design for All within Living Labs, Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, ICE'2012 "Innovation by Collaboration and Entrepreunarial Partnerships", Munich, Germany, 18-20 June 2012
11. Sanders, E. B.-N. & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18.
12. Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., & Scapin, D. (2010). Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation. Proceedings of the Living Lab Summer School, Paris, August 2010.
13. Salminen, J., Konsti-Laasko, S., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B. (2011). Evaluating User Involvement within Living Labs through the use of a Domain Landscape. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising, ICE'2011 "Innovating Products and Services for Collaborative Networks", Aachen, Germany, June 2011
14. Pallot, M., Krawczyk, P. and Kivilehto, A. (2013). "User Centred Open Innovation Domain Landscape within the European Network of Living Labs". Proceedings of the ISPIM'2013 Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 2013
15. Krawczyk, P. (2013). Innovation Capability, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance within European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL). In proceedings of 19th ICE Conference IEEE Engineering, Technology and Innovation, 24-26 June 2013, the Hague, The Netherlands.
16. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Doctoral dissertation. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Ajzen, I. (1991). "The theory of planned behavior". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2):179-211. Retrieved at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2F0749-5978%2891%2990020-T
18. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. st, 2014 at the following URL http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
20. Leonardi, Paul M. and Barley, Stephen R. (2010). What's Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, pp. 1-51, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1551370
21. Aragall, F., Montana, J. (2012). Universal Design: The HUMBLES Method for User-Centred Business. Publisher: Gower Publishing, Date: January 2012. ISBN 978-0-566-08865-0.