Using agent transparency to support situation awareness of the Autonomous Squad Member

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 46, Issue , 2017, Pages 13-25

  Selkowitz, Anthony R ^a   Lakhmani, Shan G ^b   Chen, Jessie Y C ^a  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Human Robot interaction; Situation awareness; Transparency; Trust

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; TRANSPARENCY;

COGNITIVE PROCESSING; HUMAN-ROBOT-TEAM; MONITORING TASKS; PERCEIVED USABILITY; SITUATION AWARENESS; THREAT DETECTION; TRUST;

SOCIAL ROBOTS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COGNITION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTELLIGENCE TEST; MACHINE LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SITUATION AWARENESS BASED AGENT TRANSPARENCY MODEL; TEAMWORK; TRUST; VIRTUAL REALITY; WORKLOAD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85017417829     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ahlström, C., Dukic, T., Ivarsson, E., Kircher, A., Rydbeck, B., & Viström, M. (2010). Performance of a one-camera and a three-camera system.
2. Bennett, K.B., Flach, J.M., Configural and pictorial displays. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Engineering, 2013, 517–533.
3. Brooke, J., SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189:194 (1996), 4–7.
4. Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J., Human-agent teaming for multi-robot control: A review of human factors issues. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 44:1 (2014), 13–29.
5. Chen, J. Y., Lakhmani, S. G., Stowers, K., Selkowitz, A. R., Wright, J. L., & Barnes, M. J., (in press). Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human autonomy teaming effectiveness. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science.
6. Chen, J.Y., Procci, K., Boyce, M., Wright, J.L., Garcia, A., Barnes, M.J., SA-based agent transparency (ARL-TR-6905). 2014, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
7. de Visser, E.J., Cohen, M., Freedy, A., Parasuraman, R., A design methodology for trust cue calibration in cognitive agents. International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality, 2014 June, Springer International Publishing, 251–262.
8. Defense Science Board, Defense science board summer study on autonomy. 2016, Under Secretary of Defense, Washington, DC.
9. Endsley, M.R., Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37:1 (1995), 32–64.
10. Findlay, J.M., Walker, R., A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:04 (1999), 661–674.
11. Gillespie, K., Molineaux, M., Floyd, M.W., Vattam, S.S., Aha, D.W., Goal reasoning for an autonomous squad member. Proceedings of the workshop on goal reasoning (held at the 3rd conference on advances in cognitive systems), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, May 28–31, 2015, 52–67.
12. Hancock, P.A., Billings, D.R., Schaefer, K.E., Chen, J.Y., De Visser, E.J., Parasuraman, R., A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 53:5 (2011), 517–527.
13. Hart, S. G. (2006). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Paper presented at the proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting.
14. Hart, S., Staveland, L., Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Hancock, P., Meshkati, N., (eds.) Human mental workload, 1988, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 139–183.
15. Hill, S.G., Barber, D., Evans, A.W. III, Achieving the vision of effective soldier-robot teaming: Recent work in multimodal communication. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts, 2015, 177–178.
16. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G., Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4:1 (2000), 53–71.
17. Jones, D.G., Kaber, D.B., Situation awareness measurement and the situation awareness global assessment technique. Stanton, N., Hedge, A., Hendrick, H., Brookhuis, K., Salas, E., (eds.) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods, 2004, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 419–427.
18. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A., Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology 8:4 (1976), 441–480.
19. Klenk, M., Molineaux, M., Aha, D.W., Goal-driven autonomy for responding to unexpected events in strategy simulations. Computational Intelligence 29:2 (2013), 187–206.
20. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46:1 (2004), 50–80.
21. Lichacz, F.M., An examination of situation awareness and confidence within a distributed information sharing environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50:3 (2006), 344–348.
22. Mercado, J.E., Rupp, M.A., Chen, J.Y., Barnes, M.J., Barber, D., Procci, K., Intelligent agent transparency in human–agent teaming for Multi-UxV management. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 58:3 (2016), 401–415.
23. Miller, C.A., Delegation and transparency: Coordinating interactions so information exchange is no surprise. International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, 2014, 191–202 June.
24. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D., A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 30:3 (2000), 286–297.
25. Selkowitz, A.R., Larios, C.A., Lakhmani, S.G., Chen, J.Y., Displaying information to support transparency for autonomous platforms. Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, 161, 2017.
26. Stubbs, K., Wettergreen, D., Hinds, P.H., Autonomy and common ground in human-robot interaction: A field study. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 22:2 (2007), 42–50.
27. Wang, L., Jamieson, G.A., Hollands, J.G., The effects of design features on users’ trust in and reliance on a combat identification system. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 55:1 (2011), 375–379.
28. Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed., 2007, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Height, MA.