The effects of design features on users' trust in and reliance on a combat identification system

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 375-379

  Wang, Lu ^a   Jamieson, Greg A ^b   Hollands, Justin G ^c  

^a MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMBAT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; DESIGN FEATURES; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY; IMPLICIT FEEDBACK; TARGET IDENTIFICATION; TASK ENVIRONMENT;

DESIGN;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 81855196043     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551077     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: Concepts evolving themes a model. Interna-tional Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 737-758.
2. Dzindolet M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., Dawe, L. A., & Anderson B. W. (2000). Misuse of an automated decision making system. In Conference on Human Interaction with Complex Systems 2000 (pp. 81-85). Urbana-Champaign IL.
3. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck,H. P.,Dawe L. A., & Anderson B. W. (2001a). Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology, 13, 147-164. (Pubitemid 33690770)
4. Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L., Pomranky, R., Peterson,S. & Beck H. (2001b). Automation reliance on a combat iden-tification system. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 532-536). Santa Monica CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
5. Hart S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.) Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North Hol-land Press.
6. Identification friend or foe. (2011). In Wikipedia. Retrieved Jan 20 2011 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identification-friend-or-foe
7. Ivtsenkov, G., Mantsvetov, A, & Berik, E. (2009). CA Patent No. 2549727. Quebec Canada: Canadian Intellectual Property Office.
8. Jian, J. Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000). Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 4, 53-71.
9. Karsh, R., Walrath, J. D., Swoboda, J. C. & Pillalamarri K. (1995). Effect of battlefield combat identification system information on target identification time and errors in a simulated tank engagement task. (Technical report ARL-TR-854). Aberdeen Proving Ground MD: Army Research Lab.
10. Kogler, T. M. (2003). The effects of degraded vision and au-tomatic combat identification reliability on infantry friendly fire engagements. Unpublished master's thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
11. Lee, J. D., & See K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Design-ing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50-80. (Pubitemid 44490367)
12. Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE ques-tionnaire. In Usability Interface: Usability SIG Newslet-ter, October. Retrieved Jan 20th 2011 from http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0110-measuring-with-use.html
13. Meyer, J. (2001). Effects of warning validity and proximity on responses to warnings. Human Factors, 43, 563-572. (Pubitemid 34327074)
14. Neyedli, H. F., Hollands, J. G., & Jamieson, G. A. (in press). Beyond identity: Incorporating system reliability informa-tion into an automated combat identification system. Hu-man Factors.
15. Neyedli, H. F., Wang, L., Jamieson, G. A., & Hollands J. G. (2010). Evaluating reliance on combat identification sys-tems: The role of reliability feedback. In D. H. Andrews, R. P. Herz, & M. B. Wolf (Eds.), Human factors issues in combat identification (pp. 247-262). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
16. Parasuraman, R., & Miller, C.A. (2004). Trust and etiquette in high-criticality automated systems. Communications of the ACM, 47, p. 51-55.
17. Sherman, K. (2000). Combat identification system for the dismounted soldier. In Proceedings of SPIE 2000: Digiti-zation of the Battlespace V and Battlefield Biomedical Technologies II (pp.135-146). Orlando, FL: the Interna-tional Society for Optical Engineering.
18. nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp.292-296). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
19. nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp.287-291). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
20. Wang, L., Jamieson, G. A., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Trust and reliance on an automated combat identification sys-tem. Human Factors, 51, 281-291.