#JeSuisCharlie: Towards a multi-method study of hybrid media events

Media and Communication

Volumn 4, Issue 4A, 2016, Pages 97-108

  Sumiala, Johanna ^a   Tikka, Minttu ^a   Huhtamäki, Jukka ^a   Valaskivi, Katja ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Automated content analysis; Charlie Hebdo; Digital ethnography; Hybrid media event; Social network analytics; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017349668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21832439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17645/mac.v4i4.593     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allan, S., & Thorsen, E. (Eds.) (2009). Citizen journalism: Global perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.
2. Bennett, L. W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of con- nective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
3. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of age in second life. An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Boorstin, D. J. (1973). The image—A guide to pseudo-events in America. New York: Atheneum.
5. Boumans, J. W., & Trilling, D. (2016). Taking stock of the toolkit. Digital Journalism, 4(1), 8-23.
6. Bruno, N. (2011). Tweet first, verify later? How real-time information is changing the coverage of worldwide crisis events. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Oxford: University of Oxford.
7. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Cottle, S. (2006). Mediatized rituals: beyond manufacturing consent. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 411-432.
10. Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London: Routlegde.
11. Couldry, N., Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (Eds.). (2010). Media events in a global age. Routledge: Abingdon.
12. Dayan, D. (2010). Beyond media events. Disenchantment, derailment, disruption. In N. Couldry, A. Hepp, & F. Krotz (Eds.), Media events in a global age (pp. 23-42). London: Routledge.
13. Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events. The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Debord, G. (1967). Society of the spectacle. Buchet-Chastel.
15. Eide, E., Kunelius, R., & Phillips, A. (Eds.), (2008). Transnational media events: The Mohammed cartoons and the imagined clash of civilizations. Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
16. Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005). Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling (pp. 363-370). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
17. Fiske, J. (1994). Media matters: Everyday culture and political change. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Freeman, L. C. (2000). Visualizing social networks. Journal of Social Structure, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Free man.html
19. Girginova, K. (2015). New media, creativity, and the Olympics: A case study into the use of #NBCFail during the Sochi winter games. Communication & Sport. doi:10.1177/2167479515576101
20. Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
21. Hepp, A., & Couldry, N. (2010). Introduction: Media events in globalized media cultures. In N. Couldry, A. Hepp, & F. Krotz (Eds.), Media events in a global age (pp. 1-20). Abingdon: Routledge.
22. Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (2008). Media events, globalization and cultural change: An introduction to the special issue. Communications. The Journal of European Communication Research, 33(3), 265-272.
23. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
24. Huhtamäki, J., Russell, M. G., Rubens, N., & Still, K. (2015). Ostinato: The exploration-automation cycle of user-centric, process-automated data-driven visual network analytics. In S. A. Matei, M. G. Russell, & E. Bertino (Eds.), Transparency in social media: Tools, methods and algorithms for mediating online interactions (pp. 197-222). Retrieved from http://link. springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-18552-1_ 11
25. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (2007). ‘No more peace!’ How disaster, terror and war have upstaged media events. International Journal of Communication, 1, 157-166.
26. Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (2010). 'No more peace!’ How disaster, terror and war have upstaged media events. In N. Couldry, A. Hepp, & F. Krotz (Eds.), Media events in a global age (pp. 32-42). Abingdon: Routledge.
27. Kellner, D. (2003). Media spectacle. London: Routledge.
28. Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. London: Sage.
29. Kraidy, M. M. (2002). Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory, 12(3), 316-339.
30. Kraidy, M., & Mourad, S. (2010). Hypermedia space and global communication studies lessons from the Middle East. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1256&context=asc_ papers
31. Kreiss, D., Meadows, L., & Remensperger, J. (2014). Political performance, boundary spaces, and active spectatorship: Media production at the 2012 Democratic National Convention. Journalism, 16(5), 677-595.
32. Kyriakidou, M. (2008). Rethinking media events in the context of a global public sphere: Exploring the audience of global disasters in Greece. Communications. The Journal of European Communication Research, 33(3), 273-291.
33. Laaksonen, S.-M., Nelimarkka, M., Tuokko, M., Marttila, M., & Kekkonen, A. (2015). Data augmented ethnography: using big data and ethnography to explore candidates’ digital interactions. In Proceedings of the Empiricist’s Challenge: Asking Meaningful Questions in the Age of Big Data Conference. Mannheim: University of Mannheim.
34. Lee, B., & LiPuma, E. (2002). Cultures of circulation: The imaginations of modernity. Public Culture, 14(1), 191-213.
35. Liebes, T. (1997). Reporting the Arab Israeli conflict: How hegemony works. London: Routledge.
36. Liebes, T. (1998). Television’s disaster marathons. A danger for democratic processes? In T. Liebes & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity, (pp. 71-84). London: Routledge.
37. Liebes, T., & Blondheim, M. (2005). Myths to the rescue: How live television intervenes in history. In E.W. Rothenbuhler & M. Coman (Eds.), Media anthropology, (pp. 188-198). California: Sage.
38. Nossek, H. (2008). ’News media’—Media events: Terrorist acts as media events. Communications. The Journal of European Communication Research, 33(3), 313-330.
39. Parse. ly (2016). Does Twitter matter to news. The authority report. Parsely.com Retrieved from http://learn.parsely.com/rs/314-EBB-255/images/authority -report-10.pdf
40. Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography. The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145, 123-134.
41. Procter, R., Vis, F., & Voss, A. (2013). Reading the riots on Twitter: Methodological innovation for the analysis of big data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), 197-214.
42. Roel, P. (2009). Intense media coverage. Communications. The Journal of European Communication Research, 34(1), 1-20.
43. Rojek, C. (2013). Event power: How global events manage and manipulate. London & Thousand Oaks: Sage.
44. Rothenbuhler, E. W. (1998). Ritual communication: From everyday conversation to mediated ceremony. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45. Rothenbuhler, E. W. (2010). Media events in the age of terrorism and Internet. The Romanian Review of Journalism and Communication, IV(2), 34-41.
46. Scannell, P. (1995). Media events (review). Media, Culture & Society, 17(1), 151-157.
47. Scannell, P. (2001). Editorial. Media, Culture & Society, 23(6), 699-705.
48. Shils, E., & Young, M. (1956). The meaning of the coronation. Sociological Review, 1(2), 63-82.
49. Statista. (2016). Leading social networks worldwide as of April 2016, ranked by number of active users (in mil-lions). Statista.com. Retrieved from http://www.sta tista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users
50. Sumiala, J. (2013). Media and ritual. Death, community and everyday life. London: Routledge.
51. Sumiala, J., & Korpiola, L. (2016). Tahrir 2011: Contested dynamics of a media event. In B. Mitu & S. Poulakid-akos (Eds.), Media events: A critical contemporary approach. London: Palgrave McMillan.
52. Sumiala, J., & Tikka, M. (2013). Broadcast yourself— Global news! A netnography of the ‘flotilla’ news on YouTube. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), 201-352.
53. Twitter. (2016). Twitter usage/company facts. Twitter. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/company
54. Utz, S., Schultz, F., & Glocka, S. (2013). Crisis communication online: How medium, crisis type and emotions affected public reactions in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Public Relations Review, 39, 40-46.
55. Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041-1061.
56. Vis, F. (2013). A critical reflection on big data: Considering APIs, researchers and tools as data makers. First Monday, 18(10). doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4878
57. Whitehead, T. (2015, January 1) Paris Charlie Hebdo at- tack: Je Suis Charlie hashtag one of most popular in Twitter history. Telegraph. Retrieved from http:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/fran ce/11336879/Paris-Charlie-Hebdo-attack-Je-Suis-Charlie-hashtag-one-of-most-popular-in-Twitter-history.html
58. Wittel, A. (2000). Ethnography on the move: from field to net to Internet. Forum Qualitative Sozialfor-schung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(1).
59. Yang, J., & Leskovec, J. (2014). Overlapping communities explain core-periphery organization of networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(12), 1892-1902.