Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement

Journal of Communication

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1041-1061

  Vaccari, Cristian ^a   Chadwick, Andrew ^a   O'Loughlin, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dual Screening; Hybrid Media System; Media Events; Political Engagement; Social Media; Television; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; MASS MEDIA; MEDIA ROLE; PANEL DATA; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL SYSTEM;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84958923142     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12187     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anstead, N., & O'Loughlin, B. (2011). The emerging viewertariat and BBC Question Time television debate and real-time commenting online. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 440-462. doi:10.1177/1940161211415519.
2. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personlization of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3. Boulianne, S. (2009). Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, 26(2), 193-211. doi:10.1080/10584600902854363.
4. Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542.
5. boyd, d. (2011). Social networked sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture in social network sites (pp. 39-58). New York, NY: Routledge.
6. Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283-301. doi:10.1080/10584600701471666.
7. Chadwick, A. (2009). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. I/S: Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 5(1), 9-41.
8. Chadwick, A. (2011a). Britain's first live televised party leaders' debate: From the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(1), 24-44. doi:10.1093/pa/gsq045.
9. Chadwick, A. (2011b). The political information cycle in a hybrid news system: The British Prime Minister and the "bullygate" affair. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 3-29. doi:10.1177/1940161210384730.
10. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11. Couldry, N., Hepp, A., & Krotz, F. (Eds.) (2010). Media events in a global age. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
12. Dayan, D., & Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630.
14. Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2015). Of Big Birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 presidential debates. Information, Communication & Society, 18(4), 390-406. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659.
15. Frees, E. W. (2004). Longitudinal and panel data: Analysis and applications in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 62-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Giglietto, F., & Silva, D. (2014). Second screen and participation: A content analysis on a full season dataset of tweets. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 260-277. doi:10.1111/jcom.12085.
18. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Garcia-Perdomo, V., & McGregor, S. C. (2015). What is second screening? Exploring motivations of second screen use and its effect on online political participation. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 793-815. doi:10.1111/jcom.12174.
19. Gillespie, M., O'Loughlin, B., & Proctor, R. (2013, March 30). Tweeting the Olympics. Confidential report. London, England: BBC World Service.
20. Google Think Insights. (2012). The new multiscreen world: Understanding cross-platform consumer behavior. Retrieved from http://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/multiscreenworld_final.pdf
21. Heidar, K. (2006). Party membership and participation. In R. Katz & W. Crotty (Eds.), Handbook of party politics (pp. 301-315). London, England: Sage.
22. Johnson, N. (2014). Emmerdale and Corrie outshines BBC's Farage v Clegg debate. Retrieved from http://mediatel.co.uk/newsline/2014/04/03/emmerdale-and-corrie-outshines-bbcs-farrage-v-clegg-debate/
23. Jungherr, A. (2014). The logic of political coverage on Twitter: Temporal dynamics and content. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 239-259. doi:10.1111/jcom.12087.
24. Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #OccupyEverywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259-279. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x.
25. Kreiss, D. (2014). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns' use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814562445.
26. Larsson, A. O. (2013). Tweeting the viewer: Use of Twitter in a talk show context. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 57(2), 135-152. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787081.
27. Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729-747. doi:10.1177/1461444811422894.
28. Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., & Lazer, D. (2014). Rising tides or rising stars? Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e94093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094093.
29. Macmillan, G. (2014). 80% of UK users access Twitter via their mobile. Retrieved from https://blog.twitter.com/en-gb/2014/80-of-uk-users-access-twitter-via-their-mobile
30. Nielsen. (2013). Action figures: How second screens are transforming TV viewing. Retrieved from http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2013/action-figures--how-second-screens-are-transforming-tv-viewing.html
31. OFCOM (2014). Adults' media use and attitudes report 2014. London, England: Author.
32. Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital politics in western democracies: A comparative study. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.